Starman's plane

Discussion in 'Aircraft Design / Aerodynamics / New Technology' started by Starman, Aug 27, 2009.

Help Support HomeBuiltAirplanes Forum by donating:

  1. Nov 29, 2009 #341

    Dan Thomas

    Dan Thomas

    Dan Thomas

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2008
    Messages:
    4,873
    Likes Received:
    2,083
    Turbo-compounding is not the same as turbocharging. Not at all. Turbo-compounding uses an exhaust-driven turbine that is directly geared to the crankshaft and helps drive it. It doesn't compress air for the intake. And it was complex and heavy and pretty much obsolete when it showed up.


    There are few piston engines of any sort that have flown above 40,000 feet. The reason jets can do it is that their true airspeed increases enormously with the reduced drag, and the ram recovery in the engine intake contributes a whole lot to the engine's compression. Piston engines aren't helped by that at all.

    Dan
     
  2. Nov 29, 2009 #342

    orion

    orion

    orion

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2003
    Messages:
    5,800
    Likes Received:
    135
    Location:
    Western Washington
    Thanks guys - I haven't laughed this hard for a while.

    By this reasoning, if I visualized spending the night with Michelle Pfeiffer, that would be the same as actually doing it? I have a good imagination but that's not even close - I'm not convinced.
     
  3. Nov 29, 2009 #343

    pie_row

    pie_row

    pie_row

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2009
    Messages:
    710
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    salt lake city Ut
    good by
     
    Last edited: Nov 30, 2009
  4. Nov 30, 2009 #344

    pie_row

    pie_row

    pie_row

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2009
    Messages:
    710
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    salt lake city Ut
    good by
     
    Last edited: Nov 30, 2009
  5. Nov 30, 2009 #345

    pie_row

    pie_row

    pie_row

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2009
    Messages:
    710
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    salt lake city Ut
    good by
     
    Last edited: Nov 30, 2009
  6. Nov 30, 2009 #346

    Topaz

    Topaz

    Topaz

    Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2005
    Messages:
    13,873
    Likes Received:
    5,480
    Location:
    Orange County, California
    Dreams are good. I don't think anyone would suggest you give up your dream.

    However, you quite literally don't know what you don't know. The gulf between your 'want' and what you actually have the knowledge to achieve right now is so vast that I can't even put it into words.

    You do yourself a huge disservice with statements like, "I've flown 80,000ft in my head and it worked fine." That's fantasy land. It bears little or no relation to reality, and no, it won't tell you what will work or not. Someone with the necessary experience and training might be able to visualize some of the problems, but they would do so as a means to frame the right means of putting real-world engineering to them. Dreaming is not problem-solving or engineering, and never will be.

    Pie_row, you've built your air-castle. Now's the time to put real foundations under it. Fantasy like you've shown here today will just keep you from ever actually making your dream come true.
     
  7. Nov 30, 2009 #347

    Starman

    Starman

    Starman

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2009
    Messages:
    2,011
    Likes Received:
    61
    Location:
    High in the Andes Mountains
    thanks, I didn't mind the discussion.

    Does this forum have a thread splitter?

    Yes I remember seeing that but hadn't noticed the V8 power till now.

    The cockpit on my design is pretty compact, except for width (28-30") it is low and reclining, like a Sailplane or a VariEze. The fuselage is also as compact as possible, see side views.

    I think this sort of reverse delta or low AR Fauvel style plank is the most efficient package which includes a horizontal tail surface with a flying wing.

    wing loading - 10 psf
    wing area - 210 sq.ft
    span - 30 ft
    length - 20.5 ft nose to prop
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Nov 30, 2009
  8. Nov 30, 2009 #348
  9. Nov 30, 2009 #349

    JimCovington

    JimCovington

    JimCovington

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2009
    Messages:
    217
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Burlington, VT
    Interesting! The spindly forward-retracting gear reminds me of the Lesher Teal.

    http://www.homebuiltairplanes.com/f...cutting-edge-technology/4393-lesher-teal.html
     
  10. Nov 30, 2009 #350

    orion

    orion

    orion

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2003
    Messages:
    5,800
    Likes Received:
    135
    Location:
    Western Washington
  11. Nov 30, 2009 #351

    Starman

    Starman

    Starman

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2009
    Messages:
    2,011
    Likes Received:
    61
    Location:
    High in the Andes Mountains
    These are the planforms the wing is competing against. An X-Wing Fighter and a Velociraptor.
     

    Attached Files:

  12. Nov 30, 2009 #352

    autoreply

    autoreply

    autoreply

    Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2009
    Messages:
    10,732
    Likes Received:
    2,542
    Location:
    Rotterdam, Netherlands
    The one on the left seems to have extraordinary big elevators/tails, does that have a specific reason?
     
  13. Nov 30, 2009 #353

    Starman

    Starman

    Starman

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2009
    Messages:
    2,011
    Likes Received:
    61
    Location:
    High in the Andes Mountains
    The reason is because that design is a canard with high lift bias to the front. For me this planform is the most efficient in terms of overall lift versus combined wing area for more short coupled designs, this wouldn't apply to designs with really long tails. When you add the horizontal tail area to the wing on short coupled designs it adds a lot of total wing surface, you end up with hardly any less than a lower wing loading tailless plank or delta would require for a given stall speed and you have the added surfaces to make and sometimes more interference drag.

    For now I prefer my plank version but the problem with both it and the delta is the sheer size of the pieces (I want a 50 - 55 mph stall speed) and the army of boys or cranes it would take to move them.

    I always liked the idea of a bird shaped plane, and this plank has that, I saw a crow flying ... like the wing. I feed a few of the local crows and we are getting to be buddies.

    The canard or tandem wing version has the smallest and most manageable piece size.

    As far as canards go, it's only logical to want to want the hard working front wing to carry most of the weight to make for the smallest overall wing area, kind of like quicky style rather than varieze style, but with even more weight bias to the front.

    The interesting thing is that by doing this and pushing the line as far as short coupling is concerned (tandem wing is ideal for short coupling), you get the front wing flap/pitch control surface actually behind the CG :D try to wrap your mind around how that affects control and stability and I'll get back to you later :roll:

    + the rear wing control surfaces will not be just ailerons but be elevons, interlinked with the front elevators like the variviggen and some other tandems have used.
     
    Last edited: Dec 3, 2009
  14. Dec 1, 2009 #354

    Starman

    Starman

    Starman

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2009
    Messages:
    2,011
    Likes Received:
    61
    Location:
    High in the Andes Mountains
    These are 30, 40, and 50ft spans of about 210sq.ft, not counting the elevators. One of the things I like about the Fauvel style is how easy it is to switch aspects ratios and range and how streamlined they are.

    Getting back to the compactness of the fuselage, since it has a long nosecone the front bulkhead to prop length is about 16 3/4 ft long, overall length is 26 ft. Do you think the vortex from the strake will cause an elevator problem at high AOA? I think it might affect it a little but it won't be too bad.
     

    Attached Files:

  15. Dec 1, 2009 #355

    Autodidact

    Autodidact

    Autodidact

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2009
    Messages:
    4,513
    Likes Received:
    799
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    For some reason I like the long span version, reminds me of a soaring bird or even a Pteradactyl.
     
  16. Dec 4, 2009 #356

    Starman

    Starman

    Starman

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2009
    Messages:
    2,011
    Likes Received:
    61
    Location:
    High in the Andes Mountains
    It turns out that if you make the span short enough, with the wing area big enough, and the engine and prop far enough forward, that you can have a delta wing and still incorporate the power steering, or as you chaps call it, thrust vectoring, into the design. I guess I'll stick with the delta plan after all. The neat thing is that having thrust vectoring will make it easy to do the cobra maneuver, something that I though would be fun earlier. :) 24 foot span, 210 sq.ft.


     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 20, 2019
  17. Feb 25, 2012 #357

    dirk_D

    dirk_D

    dirk_D

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    93
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Victoria, Australia.
    This final sketch looks very nice, any progress on this in the last 3 years?
     
  18. Feb 26, 2012 #358

    bmcj

    bmcj

    bmcj

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    12,974
    Likes Received:
    4,919
    Location:
    Fresno, California
    Not sure if you'll get an answer... he hasn't checked in on the forum for over a year.
     
  19. Mar 3, 2012 #359

    Starman

    Starman

    Starman

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2009
    Messages:
    2,011
    Likes Received:
    61
    Location:
    High in the Andes Mountains
    Hi Dirk, the design migrated on to other things. I always liked the rear engine for visibility but a front prop is much better for many other efficiencies so my last design is a mid engine front prop plane that looks pretty standard. I don't know if this pic will take, but the last design was posted in the 'Night Fury' thread. This is a side view but the location of the prop in that particular drawing is just one crazy idea. The primary location is at the nose where you see a spinner like object =) It's the side view in post #16 in the Night Fury thread.

    http://www.homebuiltairplanes.com/f...ynamics-new-technology/9104-night-fury-2.html
     
    Last edited: Mar 3, 2012
  20. Mar 3, 2012 #360

    Starman

    Starman

    Starman

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2009
    Messages:
    2,011
    Likes Received:
    61
    Location:
    High in the Andes Mountains

    Hi Bruce, I had a change of plans. My political views changed to 'run for the hills' so i sold the corvette aluminum V8 and a bunch of other stuff and ended up in the remote mountain wilderness in the South of Ecuador, living on a little farm which is a bit of a walk upriver from the nearest town, which is a teeny little town.

    I am curious about ultralight rules in Ecuador, but not in a hurry to find out.
     

Share This Page



arrow_white