Scale ME-262

Discussion in 'Warbirds / Warbird Replicas' started by Saville, Oct 5, 2019.

Help Support HomeBuiltAirplanes Forum by donating:

  1. Oct 14, 2019 #121

    Saville

    Saville

    Saville

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2014
    Messages:
    66
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    Boston Ma
    Is that right? I didn't know.....
     
  2. Oct 14, 2019 #122

    Speedboat100

    Speedboat100

    Speedboat100

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2018
    Messages:
    724
    Likes Received:
    57
    Location:
    Europe
    Ok...you really want go down this way.... !?
     
    Last edited: Oct 15, 2019
  3. Oct 14, 2019 #123

    Riggerrob

    Riggerrob

    Riggerrob

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2014
    Messages:
    1,195
    Likes Received:
    344
    Location:
    Canada
    The first Messerschmitt 262 prototype made its first flight with straight wings, a piston engine and propeller in the nose, because jet engines were not ready. It also had a tail wheel.

    When they installed jet engines, they had to sweep wings to balance the airplane, especially after the piston engine was removed from the nose.

    Mounting jet engines well out on the wings just followed tradition, but they soon learned that mounting them closer to the fuselage vastly reduced yaw problems after one engine quit.

    Tailwheel undercarriage proved problematic with jet engines. With the thrust line below the wings, they could not dip the nose to flatten angle of attack to accelerate during take-off. Test pilots resorted to tapping brakes to bring the nose level.
    Messerschmitt engineers solved the problem by installing tricycle landing gear in later prototypes and all production Me 262s.
    99 percent of later jets have tricycle landing gear.
















    take-off. Test
     
  4. Oct 14, 2019 #124

    BBerson

    BBerson

    BBerson

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    12,172
    Likes Received:
    2,392
    Location:
    Port Townsend WA
    Actually, might need a twin engine jet rating or authorization. Good luck with that.
     
  5. Oct 15, 2019 #125

    pictsidhe

    pictsidhe

    pictsidhe

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2014
    Messages:
    6,958
    Likes Received:
    1,915
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Light sport? A 262 is one of my 103 daydreams...
     
  6. Oct 15, 2019 #126

    vhhjr

    vhhjr

    vhhjr

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2003
    Messages:
    45
    Likes Received:
    49
    Have a look at this:



    Vince Homer
     
  7. Oct 15, 2019 #127

    Speedboat100

    Speedboat100

    Speedboat100

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2018
    Messages:
    724
    Likes Received:
    57
    Location:
    Europe
    Wings were swept in the earliest prop version too..naturally.
     

    Attached Files:

  8. Oct 16, 2019 #128

    BJC

    BJC

    BJC

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2013
    Messages:
    9,693
    Likes Received:
    6,483
    Location:
    97FL, Florida, USA
    We report, you decide:
    AB499E35-5724-47B0-9A88-AB2DC5526634.gif 11FA21A9-2DE2-479E-96EB-79EA552A5A7A.gif
     
    Vigilant1 likes this.
  9. Oct 17, 2019 #129

    Speedboat100

    Speedboat100

    Speedboat100

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2018
    Messages:
    724
    Likes Received:
    57
    Location:
    Europe
    Does it look like a Wright Flyer to you ?
     
  10. Oct 17, 2019 #130

    Aerowerx

    Aerowerx

    Aerowerx

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    Messages:
    5,077
    Likes Received:
    1,386
    Location:
    Marion, Ohio
    Don't looked swept to me.
     
  11. Oct 17, 2019 #131

    Aerowerx

    Aerowerx

    Aerowerx

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    Messages:
    5,077
    Likes Received:
    1,386
    Location:
    Marion, Ohio
    Oh, Yes! Now I see it!

    They look exactly alike, except for the differences!
     
    Dominic Eller likes this.
  12. Oct 18, 2019 #132

    Urquiola

    Urquiola

    Urquiola

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2013
    Messages:
    45
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Madrid, Spain
    Me 262 b.gif DC-10.png [/ATTACH] Lockheed L-1011 TriStar.jpg And this? Me-262 vs DC-10 vs Lockheed 1011 TriStar, wing swept angle differs, but main wing plan form is very, very similar. 'There is no worse blind than those who refuse seeing' (Spanish proverb) Or you claim, same as Soviets, when accused of plagium of US Aircraft designs, that: 'Aerodynamics is same for all, thus aircraft with same purpose are similar'? Gesund +
     
    Last edited: Oct 18, 2019
    Speedboat100 likes this.
  13. Oct 18, 2019 #133

    wktaylor

    wktaylor

    wktaylor

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2003
    Messages:
    123
    Likes Received:
    67
    Location:
    Midwest USA
  14. Oct 18, 2019 #134

    pictsidhe

    pictsidhe

    pictsidhe

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2014
    Messages:
    6,958
    Likes Received:
    1,915
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Guys, if you keep posting pics of airliners, the thread will move on to pedals.
     
  15. Oct 18, 2019 #135

    Speedboat100

    Speedboat100

    Speedboat100

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2018
    Messages:
    724
    Likes Received:
    57
    Location:
    Europe
    Yes let's keep it Me-262 bound.
     

    Attached Files:

  16. Oct 20, 2019 #136

    vhhjr

    vhhjr

    vhhjr

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2003
    Messages:
    45
    Likes Received:
    49
    I have loaded a three view of the two place version into a CAD program. A 50% version is possible if the pilot is in a reclined seat and the canopy sill line is dropped at least 6 inches. If you don't drop the sill the canopy opening isn't wide enough to get into the cockpit. Perhaps a better scale would be closer to 60%. This makes for a good sized airplane with a 24 ft. wing span. The 50% would be doable and gives about a 20 ft span. A 50% true scale version would have about 65 ft2 of wing area so the weight would have to be minimized to keep the wing loading down. I did a restaurant placemate estimate and it's easy to see the gross approaching 1000 lbs for a WL over 15 lb/ft2.

    I have looked at large EDFs (electric ducted fans) and the largest on the marked is the 250 mm Vasy fan (http://www.vasyfan.com/) that develops 125 lbs of thrust on 35 kw (46 HP) for a total of 250 lbs.. Compare this to the Subsonex with about 260 lbs of thrust. It would be a challenge to keep the weight down. Vasy also makes a 395 mm, but doesn't have any specs for it on their web site.

    One could drive each 250 mm fan with something like a Hirth F-23 (http://www.recpower.com/hirth.htm) if you were comfortable with the two-stroke reliability. The 395 mm version would take something larger like a Hirth 3703 (100 HP). There's also a like of rotarys on the market with a single rotor 40 HP and two rotor 100+ HP that might fit better. See: https://www.wankelsupertec.de/pdfs/datasheets/KKM350_Datasheet.pdf

    https://www.aviationpros.com/engine...tor-gmbh-delivers-new-wankel-aviation-engines

    There are certainly other high output engines that would fit into the nacelles.

    Then there's the hydrid version, maybe with the engine/generator in the fuselage. That would be even a bigger development program, but would have several advantageous.

    Vince Homer
     
    Battler Britton likes this.
  17. Oct 20, 2019 #137

    BBerson

    BBerson

    BBerson

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    12,172
    Likes Received:
    2,392
    Location:
    Port Townsend WA
    There will be a lot of duct drag if you put a cold fan in a long scaled turbojet nacelle.
     
  18. Oct 20, 2019 #138

    vhhjr

    vhhjr

    vhhjr

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2003
    Messages:
    45
    Likes Received:
    49
    That's true, but also true if you put a small modern turbojet in the nacelle designed for the original Jumo. It doesn't matter so much with the turbojet because its power density is so much higher than a cold jet.

    The cold jet has appeal because of the stupendous cost of jet engines and the FAA requirements to fly planes powered by them. At this point it's all a mental exercise anyway.

    Vince Homer
     
  19. Oct 20, 2019 #139

    Toobuilder

    Toobuilder

    Toobuilder

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2010
    Messages:
    4,468
    Likes Received:
    3,265
    Location:
    Mojave, Ca
    Taking that mental excercise just one more step - has the IC/electric hybrid discussed here so casually as a "solution" gained acceptance in the light aircraft market lately?

    Nope.

    And do you want to develop this radical propulsion system at the same time as a new airframe?
     
  20. Oct 20, 2019 #140

    vhhjr

    vhhjr

    vhhjr

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2003
    Messages:
    45
    Likes Received:
    49
    Probably not. It does introduce a whole nother development program to the project. I mentioned it only because if it were possible it does solve the problem of powering a cold fan in a nacelle.

    We are currently flying an experimental aircraft with four 120 mm battery powered EDFs in addition to the normal IC engine. We're using only batteries at this time, but have been looking at the hybrid solution.

    Vince Homer
     

Share This Page



arrow_white