• Welcome aboard HomebuiltAirplanes.com, your destination for connecting with a thriving community of more than 10,000 active members, all passionate about home-built aviation. Dive into our comprehensive repository of knowledge, exchange technical insights, arrange get-togethers, and trade aircrafts/parts with like-minded enthusiasts. Unearth a wide-ranging collection of general and kit plane aviation subjects, enriched with engaging imagery, in-depth technical manuals, and rare archives.

    For a nominal fee of $99.99/year or $12.99/month, you can immerse yourself in this dynamic community and unparalleled treasure-trove of aviation knowledge.

    Embark on your journey now!

    Click Here to Become a Premium Member and Experience Homebuilt Airplanes to the Fullest!

Piston or Turbine for kit aircraft

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

mrbeauvais

Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2009
Messages
7
Location
Province of Quebec, Canada
Hi,

I'm planning to buy and build a kit helicopter. My mind is pretty much set on a manufacturer or two but I wondering if it would be better to settle for a "piston engine" to start with or "turbine engine".

I've read about few guys retrofitting a Solar turbine engine in their RW 162F and seem to pledge for those engine since then.

Supposing that I'd like to build a A600 Talon, would it be advisable to "start" with the manufacturer piston engine and then upgrade to turbine later or since you already have the bare bone airframe in your hand, it would be better to modify it right at the start? My greatest concern about choosing a different engine than what the manufacturer proposes is that I'd loose the manufacturer' support for that part at least.

Thanks
 
Back
Top