Because he made decisions that the "experts" here didn't agree with ? Because he disobeyed some of the "rules" ? I don't agree with a lot of what Peter has done. But that doesn't mean I'm right and he is wrong. This story isn't done yet.No he doesn't, and the "whys" has been convered more than enough over the last 4.5 years and some 5000 posts.
There are no points for being a critic. Anyone can be a critic.