Mark Stull

Discussion in 'The light stuff area' started by texas-buzzard, Nov 17, 2011.

Help Support HomeBuiltAirplanes Forum by donating:

  1. Feb 10, 2012 #61

    cpd

    cpd

    cpd

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Messages:
    99
    Likes Received:
    22
    Its people like George that may have prevented Mark from sharing his last design with us...........

    Chris
     
  2. Feb 10, 2012 #62

    autoreply

    autoreply

    autoreply

    Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2009
    Messages:
    10,732
    Likes Received:
    2,542
    Location:
    Rotterdam, Netherlands
    As the name implies (PRIVATE message), those are private, not public and thus I've removed them from your post.

    Mark has received lots of criticism on his designs by many people and has politely and to the point replied to all of us.

    Personally, your reply leaves a bit of a sour aftertaste to me.
     
    Topaz likes this.
  3. Feb 10, 2012 #63

    revkev6

    revkev6

    revkev6

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    425
    Likes Received:
    91
    Location:
    massachusetts
    Didn't mark actually say that was one of his favorite designs to fly??

    Even though george may have meant well, he comes across rather confrontational. I can only hope it is the "internet disease" where people forget normal rules of etiquette because things are so anonymous. Fortunately for us, Mark did not have this problem and freely shared ideas, failures and motivation with a grace that made us all respect him!

    I think we can all agree that we envy the way Mark was able to live out his dreams. Beyond all his aeronautical experience, there is a great wisdom to be taken from that!

    rest in peace mark, I hope your happy with your current study of the efficiency of ornithoptors!
     
  4. Feb 10, 2012 #64

    sachaknoop

    sachaknoop

    sachaknoop

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2012
    Messages:
    195
    Likes Received:
    11
    Location:
    Netherlands
    revkev6

    Amen! I love the way you put it in words, thank you!

    Sacha
     
  5. Feb 11, 2012 #65

    George Sychrovsky

    George Sychrovsky

    George Sychrovsky

    Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2003
    Messages:
    430
    Likes Received:
    27
    Location:
    Shirley airport MA
    What anonymous internet disease are you talking about, My user name is my real name, I am in the airplane building business and with every post I make I put my reputation on line, my info from here leads right down to my home phone and address , which by the way happens to be in your neighborhood. You can come to check it out
     
  6. Feb 29, 2012 #66

    BobDaly

    BobDaly

    BobDaly

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2011
    Messages:
    79
    Likes Received:
    13
    Location:
    Albany, NY
    I believe George S's criticism of Mark's earlier successful design is in error. He suggests that design lacked a sufficient drag truss. I beg to differ. The wing is external wire braced. The wires react not only torsion but chordwise loads. George's insistence on pinned joints is also incorrect. The analysis of trusses is made simpler if the connections are assumed to be pinned joints. If the truss members are long and slender the forces involved can usually be treated as entirely axial and any bending or shear forces are negligible. I note that the beautiful Himax George built has a wing drag truss where the joints are glued.
     
    Last edited: Feb 29, 2012
  7. Feb 29, 2012 #67

    WonderousMountain

    WonderousMountain

    WonderousMountain

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2010
    Messages:
    1,853
    Likes Received:
    193
    Location:
    Clatsop, Or
    If the truss is usable in tension only, then the size of the members can be rather small, even wires, but if compression is to be seen then you wouldn't want slender members at all, and the use of pinned joints can be very useful. At the root, Mark used aluminum strip, which was more than strong enough (I did calcs), two members were used like wires, so it was in tension, not compression. Not being braided wire, they could have bent in compression, but I don't think that happened, due to their being almost no slack in the system. Any bowing would be minimal.


    While the straps were only at the root, it's clearly seen in a later post that it was externally braced futher out. George, did you know it was to be externally braced when you commented, or do you still hold that the external bracing was insufficient?

    Didn't do any rib/compression strut calculation, but geometrically they were in optimum standard position.

    These comments do not apply to his ill fated design, which I have no information on.
     
    Last edited: Feb 29, 2012
  8. Feb 29, 2012 #68

    bmcj

    bmcj

    bmcj

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    12,918
    Likes Received:
    4,867
    Location:
    Fresno, California
    Just to repeat Dana's observation, George's critique may have been addressing Mark's earlier design, not the most recent one Mark was killed in. I believe the latest two comments speak to Mark's most recent plane.
     
  9. Feb 29, 2012 #69

    BobDaly

    BobDaly

    BobDaly

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2011
    Messages:
    79
    Likes Received:
    13
    Location:
    Albany, NY
    Well, we may be arguing semantics here so to use a more precise term, if your compression members aren't long columns then your wing truss is overbuilt. The failure mode for such a member should be buckling.

    I believe Mark only added the crossed straps when he discovered his wing to be out of square during construction. He could have trued the wing during rigging by adjusting the flying/landing wire tensions, though I understand that's difficult and time consuming and prefer Mark's solution.
     
  10. Feb 29, 2012 #70

    WonderousMountain

    WonderousMountain

    WonderousMountain

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2010
    Messages:
    1,853
    Likes Received:
    193
    Location:
    Clatsop, Or
    Do not agree, won't elaborate here.

    Blessings,

    Mountain
     
  11. Mar 30, 2012 #71

    bmcj

    bmcj

    bmcj

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    12,918
    Likes Received:
    4,867
    Location:
    Fresno, California
    Light Plane World just published an online photographic compendium of Mark's designs. Here's the link:

    Light Plane World
     
  12. Mar 30, 2012 #72

    delta

    delta

    delta

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2011
    Messages:
    1,923
    Likes Received:
    191
    Location:
    Brookside Utah
    Thanks for posting this...
     
  13. Mar 30, 2012 #73

    topspeed100

    topspeed100

    topspeed100

    Banned

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    4,063
    Likes Received:
    63
    Location:
    Oulu/Finland
    Wasn't this his flag ship !
     

    Attached Files:

  14. Mar 31, 2012 #74

    deskpilot

    deskpilot

    deskpilot

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2009
    Messages:
    1,094
    Likes Received:
    184
    Location:
    Morphett Vale, South Australia. Just south of Adel
    Don't know about 'flag ship' but it certainly got him noticed.
     
  15. Apr 8, 2012 #75

    texas-buzzard

    texas-buzzard

    texas-buzzard

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2005
    Messages:
    173
    Likes Received:
    25
    Location:
    san angelo, tx
    Mark liked the unique design of the ringtail but didn't like the flying characteristics. his favorite design was lucky stars monoplane.

    Monte
     

Share This Page

arrow_white