Congrats Peter

Discussion in 'The light stuff area' started by Tiger Tim, Jul 20, 2019.

Help Support HomeBuiltAirplanes Forum by donating:

  1. Jul 24, 2019 #21

    Aviator168

    Aviator168

    Aviator168

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2012
    Messages:
    2,205
    Likes Received:
    246
    Location:
    Brookville, NY. USA
    His planes are going to be collecting dust after few flights. I think he's building them to make video and make money. He didn't even test the torsion load of the wing.
     
    Last edited: Jul 24, 2019
  2. Jul 24, 2019 #22

    Victor Bravo

    Victor Bravo

    Victor Bravo

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2014
    Messages:
    5,865
    Likes Received:
    4,694
    Location:
    KWHP, Los Angeles CA, USA
    And if that is the case he is still doing more for the cause and survival of homebuilt airplanes than anyone else in the world under 40 years old. We need any and every win with the younger crowd, and Peter is one of those wins.
     
    RPM314, GeneG, b7gwap and 7 others like this.
  3. Jul 24, 2019 #23

    litespeed

    litespeed

    litespeed

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2008
    Messages:
    1,390
    Likes Received:
    246
    Location:
    Sydney
    Good on ya Mate,

    Keep it up and don't worry about the critic too much.

    I do agree that more testing would be good on structures and this could easily been done in a entertaining way for the videos.

    If you can add a bit more engineering you will go very far in the game of flight.

    Don't be afraid of the unusual but beware of hidden traps for new designs.

    I see a great future.....keep flying.
     
    BJC likes this.
  4. Jul 24, 2019 #24

    Aviator168

    Aviator168

    Aviator168

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2012
    Messages:
    2,205
    Likes Received:
    246
    Location:
    Brookville, NY. USA
    I think this is exactly what his videos lack.
     
  5. Jul 24, 2019 #25

    BBerson

    BBerson

    BBerson

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    11,648
    Likes Received:
    2,183
    Location:
    Port Townsend WA
    I never heard of anyone doing a torsion test.
     
  6. Jul 24, 2019 #26

    Speedboat100

    Speedboat100

    Speedboat100

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2018
    Messages:
    542
    Likes Received:
    38
    Location:
    Europe
    Yes congrats Peter !
     
  7. Jul 24, 2019 #27

    Aviator168

    Aviator168

    Aviator168

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2012
    Messages:
    2,205
    Likes Received:
    246
    Location:
    Brookville, NY. USA
    Yeah. Not for an UL. Peter is a great inspiration.
     
  8. Jul 24, 2019 #28

    BBerson

    BBerson

    BBerson

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    11,648
    Likes Received:
    2,183
    Location:
    Port Townsend WA
    Yeah, I will. Only because what I am doing is unusual. Otherwise just grabbing the tip and twisting it is usual for slow stuff.
     
  9. Jul 24, 2019 #29

    pictsidhe

    pictsidhe

    pictsidhe

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2014
    Messages:
    6,408
    Likes Received:
    1,661
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Should I start making 103 kits in 5 years time, Peter would be top of the list to build and test one. The publicity couldn't be beaten.

    I would like to see more engineering in the videos. Even a run through of the FAR103 appendix calculations would be educational for most fans. Basic load tests are about minimum structural engineering. Peter mentioned that plans won't be available until he gets the design checked. Perhaps he could suggest some good designs available today for those chomping at the bit to get flying? There are many good designs out there.
    Perhaps a load test to a higher g would be in order now that it has actually flown.
     
  10. Jul 24, 2019 #30

    Aviator168

    Aviator168

    Aviator168

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2012
    Messages:
    2,205
    Likes Received:
    246
    Location:
    Brookville, NY. USA
    Absolutely.

    What is discouraging people who have the resources, time and want to experiment with 103 is the lack of airports in proximity of where they live. There is private airport 10 minutes from where I live; but it is not experimental friendly. The nearest one where your experimental can take off and land is at lease an hour and a half away.
     
  11. Jul 24, 2019 #31

    proppastie

    proppastie

    proppastie

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2012
    Messages:
    3,654
    Likes Received:
    1,049
    Location:
    NJ
    We do not know what the ultimate load will be unless we test to destruction....not very practical for a one off airplane. In 50 years of flying I do not think I have ever felt 3G, of course I do not fly aerobatics.
     
  12. Aug 12, 2019 #32

    hole in the ground

    hole in the ground

    hole in the ground

    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2018
    Messages:
    25
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    UK
    I’m late to this thread but I followed Peter’s builds on YT. The above might be a description of the best job in the world...
     
  13. Aug 12, 2019 #33

    pictsidhe

    pictsidhe

    pictsidhe

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2014
    Messages:
    6,408
    Likes Received:
    1,661
    Location:
    North Carolina
    No rough air?
     
  14. Aug 12, 2019 #34

    proppastie

    proppastie

    proppastie

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2012
    Messages:
    3,654
    Likes Received:
    1,049
    Location:
    NJ
    yes, but not that rough (I think)......the thermal, has a gradient....I have been lifted off my seat maybe once.....
     
  15. Aug 12, 2019 #35

    proppastie

    proppastie

    proppastie

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2012
    Messages:
    3,654
    Likes Received:
    1,049
    Location:
    NJ
  16. Aug 12, 2019 #36

    Victor Bravo

    Victor Bravo

    Victor Bravo

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2014
    Messages:
    5,865
    Likes Received:
    4,694
    Location:
    KWHP, Los Angeles CA, USA
    Some thermals have a reasonable gradient and some do not. I say this from personal experience. There are many other types of turbulence than just thermals, there is "wave rotor" where you pass through a significant downward (sinking) mass of air immediately adjacent to a significant upward moving mass of air. This creates a wind shear effect where the resulting effect is greater than just hitting thelift from level flight. There is also often a very sharp transition from sinking air to rising air when you cross a ridge line.

    YES of course we would strongly suggest that ultralight style aircraft should be operated in calmer or milder conditions, but you have to design this stuff to protect against the people who are not careful, as well as the careful people who get still hit with unexpected conditions that were not "supposed" to be happening at that time of day or in that weather system.
     
    proppastie likes this.
  17. Aug 12, 2019 #37

    proppastie

    proppastie

    proppastie

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2012
    Messages:
    3,654
    Likes Received:
    1,049
    Location:
    NJ
    What limits we design for is a subject of many reasonable opinions....I submit the FAA requirements for an airliner....how many airliners do we know have broken apart in rough air? I agree most of the sport planes, GA aircraft and pilots need higher limits for various reasons,....but a perhaps a 3G limit is not unreasonable for airliners or ultralites conservatively flown.
     
  18. Aug 13, 2019 #38

    TFF

    TFF

    TFF

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2010
    Messages:
    11,415
    Likes Received:
    3,164
    Location:
    Memphis, TN
    Think of 2.5Gs in a plane that takes off at 800,000 lb. it takes a lot of bad air to move one. Much more than a 2500 lb one.
     
    Victor Bravo and proppastie like this.
  19. Aug 13, 2019 #39

    Pops

    Pops

    Pops

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2013
    Messages:
    6,910
    Likes Received:
    5,825
    Location:
    USA.
    I have had the wind knocked out of me, back hurt, hit side of my head very hard against the door frame , everything in the cockpit hit the ceiling including people, and seen the wings bend and the landing gear shake. All over mountains. Why the JMR is rated at 6.7 G's with a 50% safety factor.
     
    proppastie and litespeed like this.
  20. Aug 13, 2019 #40

    wktaylor

    wktaylor

    wktaylor

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2003
    Messages:
    84
    Likes Received:
    30
    Location:
    Midwest USA
    Pops pointed out an important design requirement by FAA... as memory serves me... all acft must be designed to withstand survive penetration of sharp-edged vertical gusts of 75-FPS and lateral gust of similar intensity. So regardless, of designed 'G' envelop... the load envelop must include gust-loading wild-cards up to V-penetration speed [top-of 'green-arc' on the airspeed indicator].

    Pops...

    RE Your signature 'quotation' [which I have gratefully added to my quotations file]...

    Antoine de Saint-Exupery stated this concept another way...

    "A designer knows he has achieved perfection not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away."
     
    proppastie likes this.

Share This Page

arrow_white