• Welcome aboard HomebuiltAirplanes.com, your destination for connecting with a thriving community of more than 10,000 active members, all passionate about home-built aviation. Dive into our comprehensive repository of knowledge, exchange technical insights, arrange get-togethers, and trade aircrafts/parts with like-minded enthusiasts. Unearth a wide-ranging collection of general and kit plane aviation subjects, enriched with engaging imagery, in-depth technical manuals, and rare archives.

    For a nominal fee of $99.99/year or $12.99/month, you can immerse yourself in this dynamic community and unparalleled treasure-trove of aviation knowledge.

    Embark on your journey now!

    Click Here to Become a Premium Member and Experience Homebuilt Airplanes to the Fullest!

Airfoil selection question

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

rtfm

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2008
Messages
3,900
Location
Brisbane, Australia
Hi,
While playing with DesignFoil (v6) I came across something which has me puzzled:

I was examining the properties of the following wing, using different airfoils and AoA:
Span = 29ft
Root chord = 4ft
Tip chord = 2ft
Area = 87sq ft
(AR = 9.67)

My nominated flight condition was: 3000ft, 130kts, and aircraft weight of 1040lbs

NACA747a315
AoA required: 1.28 deg
Total drag (Friction + Induced) = 30.79lbs
Lift = 1040lbs
Pitch moment = -95.7 ft/lbs
Moment coeff = 0.007
LD = 33.8

However, when I used (for the same wing dimensions) a NACA0012 airfoil, I came up with the following:
AoA required: 2.5 deg
Total drag (Friction + Induced) = 41.65lbs
Lift = 1039lbs
Pitch moment = -1.98 ft/lbs
Moment coeff = 0.000
LD = 16.09

Now, to my untrained eye, it seems that the NACA0012 is a better airfoil in a number of ways - for one, it has (at 130kts) not a lot of extra drag, but almost no pitching moment. And reducing the pitching moment is good, because it means you need very little h-stab down-lift (and hence, drag).

I'm not sure if I've done the math right on the above airfoils, but on the face of it, I can't see a compelling reason NOT to use the NACA0012 for the main wing.

I am ready to be educated - so educate away!

Regards,
Duncan
 
Last edited:
Back
Top