I seem to recall they found that black worked better than yellow except when they had very dark / black clouds behind the aircraft in the circuit at which point it was effect camouflage. So they concluded yellow was the better around colour.There was a study on aircraft visibility done in New Zealand years ago with small military piston trainers. IIRC, they tried white, black, yellow, and orange and each one had advantages in different conditions: looking up against an overcast sky, looking down against an earth or forest or water background, etc. I think in the endnote they chose yellow but painted the movable control surfaces black to make it more interesting. Something like that, or maybe white with bright orange control surfaces and cowling, certainly couldn’t hurt.
I can’t find the original source document, but here is an old discussion thread.I seem to recall they found that black worked better than yellow except when they had very dark / black clouds behind the aircraft in the circuit at which point it was effect camouflage. So they concluded yellow was the better around colour.
Study this thing called "Human Factors in Aviation"...namely a thing called Design Eye Point if you are worried about ground visibility.What about structural ? Is there any evidence large droop tips or winglets effect effect visibility? What about contrasting colors on struts ,tails etc.
Is there anything that can be done in the critical head on sight picture with out drastically increasing drag ?
I’m kind of thinking of an alternate black and yellow 1 foot squares pattern on the leading edges of the wings if extended it would of course give you way overall checkerboard pattern on the upper wing services I’m kind of thinking of an alternate black and yellow 1 foot squares pattern on the leading edges of the wings if extended it would of course give you a overall checkerboard pattern on the wing Surfaces .
Are any of you taking proactive steps ?