Figure out that 'if' and I'd forget the gyro approach. Wings are just so much more efficient than a rotor.
Part 103 wing loading requirements are just so low to meet stall speed that the end results aren't very usable in gusty wind conditions that are the norm where I live....
My suspicion is that the rotor on a gyro doesn't like the bumps associated off-field operation. While it would appear that the extreme STOL capabilities of gyros would be ideal for bush operation, there must be a reason why there are no gyro bush-planes currently in service. Can anyone confirm or deny my suspicion?
As for the low wing loading on ultralights, is the main concern for you the bumps in flight, or are you looking at this from a parking and ground handling perspective? If the concern is having the machine blow away when it is parked, a quick and easy wing-folding system could solve that issue. Good handling characteristics will go a long way toward making it controllable in turbulence, but smoothing out the bumps in flight may be a bit harder to solve. I've commented before on the need for a "suspension system" on aircraft wings. I guess this is a discussion on "vaporware", so we could assume that we've got a solution available. But, is it necessary, and is it worth the cost and weight penalties on an ultralight to use such a system?
I was just looking for something that would handle the normal wind of the day that rejects paramotors, which usually only fly in the calm of the early morning, or the evening times just prior to sunset. I'm not trying to operate on what Pooh would refer to as a "blustery day".