• Welcome aboard HomebuiltAirplanes.com, your destination for connecting with a thriving community of more than 10,000 active members, all passionate about home-built aviation. Dive into our comprehensive repository of knowledge, exchange technical insights, arrange get-togethers, and trade aircrafts/parts with like-minded enthusiasts. Unearth a wide-ranging collection of general and kit plane aviation subjects, enriched with engaging imagery, in-depth technical manuals, and rare archives.

    For a nominal fee of $99.99/year or $12.99/month, you can immerse yourself in this dynamic community and unparalleled treasure-trove of aviation knowledge.

    Embark on your journey now!

    Click Here to Become a Premium Member and Experience Homebuilt Airplanes to the Fullest!

Optimising cooling

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

rtfm

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2008
Messages
3,900
Location
Brisbane, Australia
Hi,
I guess we have all come across the accompanying diagram at some time or other. But it got me to thinking...

Typically, one tends to see air inlets in the front, and exits further back on the bottom of the fuse. But this pressure diagram seems to suggest other alternatives: For instance:

  • Air intake just in front of the windshield, but more significantly,
  • Air exhaust in the FRONT of the cowl just above the spinner.
If the diagram is correct, just above the spinner is the area of lowest pressure. So why is it never used? I would hazard a guess that it has something to do with running counter to intuition, mostly. There would be a secondary argument about the fact that you'd be forcing air to change direction, and it likes going in a straight line.

But as Orion has pointed out on a number of occasions, the volume of air passing through the cooling system is governed by the pressure difference between the exhaust and the inlet. And windshield/top-of-spinner would seem to offer by far the biggest differential. Even bottom-of-spinner/top-of-spinner would seem preferable as far as pressure differential is concerned. It would seem to be about twice as efficient as exhausting the hot air from the rear-bottom of the cowl.

In fact, the route taken by air in the windshield/top-of-spinner scenario would seem fairly similar to the more traditional bottom-of-spinner/rear-of-cowl route, except only for direction of travel. And the route taken by the bottom-to-top of the spinner would nicely encircle the cooling fins and not be quite as weird...

Bottom line is that it would appear that venting the air through a hole above the spinner would seem optimal.

Just a thought...

Duncan
 

Attachments

  • Pressure differences on the cowl anotated.JPG
    Pressure differences on the cowl anotated.JPG
    11.5 KB · Views: 549
Last edited:
Back
Top