• Welcome aboard HomebuiltAirplanes.com, your destination for connecting with a thriving community of more than 10,000 active members, all passionate about home-built aviation. Dive into our comprehensive repository of knowledge, exchange technical insights, arrange get-togethers, and trade aircrafts/parts with like-minded enthusiasts. Unearth a wide-ranging collection of general and kit plane aviation subjects, enriched with engaging imagery, in-depth technical manuals, and rare archives.

    For a nominal fee of $99.99/year or $12.99/month, you can immerse yourself in this dynamic community and unparalleled treasure-trove of aviation knowledge.

    Embark on your journey now!

    Click Here to Become a Premium Member and Experience Homebuilt Airplanes to the Fullest!

Smaller Pitot/Static Tubing?

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Toobuilder

Well-Known Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2010
Messages
6,657
Location
Mojave, Ca
OK. We all know that 1/4 inch tube is the norm here but why? During the rebuild of the Rocket I asked this same question after running across some really slick 1/8 inch pneumatic tube and push lock fittings from MSCdirect.com. Its been flying for a few years now with zero issues. What factors am I failing to consider in this application? More probable icing and clogging due to the very small ID of the tube?

From an installation standpoint, the spaghetti thin 1/8 stuff is a snap to route and bundle - hardly thicker than #12 AWG wire. See the pic below for a comparison to the norm.

Pitot.jpg

This stuff is rated at 800+ PSI burst strength, so PLENTY capable for the pitot system.

As an aside, I'm also using 1/8 (stainless steel) tube for my brakes. MUCH easier to fabricate and route and I see zero difference in performance.

Not an endorsement per se', but food for thought with real world experience.
 
Back
Top