Lets Build a Lightweight Type 4

Discussion in 'Volkswagen' started by Marc W, Sep 22, 2019.

Help Support HomeBuiltAirplanes Forum by donating:

  1. Sep 22, 2019 #1

    Marc W

    Marc W

    Marc W

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2017
    Messages:
    292
    Likes Received:
    193
    Location:
    Colorado
    A fellow EAA member offered to give me a VW engine since I fly a VW powered plane. It was in a black garbage bag when I picked it up and I didn't look at it since he was in a hurry. I expected it to be a bug engine but it turned out to be a 1700cc Type 4. My CX4 has a 2180 VW that was originally built by Scott Casler. It is a good engine except it oozes oil in several places. It does perform well but we always want more! When I bought the plane my field elevation was 76' MSL. Now my home field is at 5,200' MSL and I often fly at 12,000' to clear the surrounding terrain so more HP would not be a bad thing!

    I read everything here on Type 4's. Most of it is rumor and opinion and some of it just doesn't make any sense. The only hard facts I came up with is that Limbach made engines based on the Type 4. The conventional wisdom is that the Type 4 is to heavy and to expensive. But nobody has actually built and flown one!

    The fact is the Type 4 can be built with a much larger displacement than a Type 1. I think that can justify a little heavier engine. There seems to be parts available for the Type 4. I don't know what it would cost to build a Type 4 but even if it is more than a Type 1 it could well be justified since you can build a significantly bigger engine.

    "Weight is the enemy"! I couldn't find much on Type 4 engine weights. One source said a long block weighs about 142 lbs. Mark Langford said his proposed Type 4 would weigh about 225, presumably with electric start and he also intended to use an extended prop shaft housing like Wittmans V-Witt. That had to add significant weight.

    More later.
     
  2. Sep 22, 2019 #2

    pictsidhe

    pictsidhe

    pictsidhe

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2014
    Messages:
    6,697
    Likes Received:
    1,764
    Location:
    North Carolina
    You have scales? Good, take it apart and tell us what all the parts weigh!

    If you can build a T4 with similar hp/weight as a type 1, it would be quite useable to someone.
     
  3. Sep 22, 2019 #3

    Hot Wings

    Hot Wings

    Hot Wings

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    6,305
    Likes Received:
    2,247
    Location:
    Rocky Mountains
    The VW tp IV is a better engine from an engineering point of view. They just weren't built in the numbers that the Tp1 was so the parts ARE much more expensive, even if you stay away from things like the sodium filled exhaust valves. They are heavier because they are physically bigger, both in size and displacement

    I've built many of the TpIV over the years, and still have a few cores but I wouldn't consider converting one for aircraft use. 3 other options would come first:
    Pick a plane that could fly well with a Tp1
    Build a Corvair
    Build a Subaru.

    My advice? Sell the Tp IV and use the money for a different engine.
     
    delta likes this.
  4. Sep 22, 2019 #4

    Hephaestus

    Hephaestus

    Hephaestus

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,137
    Likes Received:
    246
    Location:
    YMM
    Some of the replacement magnesium blocks are universal now - type 1 or 4. Believe they're about 30lbs heavier than the basic type1.
     
  5. Sep 22, 2019 #5

    pilot103

    pilot103

    pilot103

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2003
    Messages:
    97
    Likes Received:
    18
    Its been done before, search the back issues of Contact!
     
  6. Sep 22, 2019 #6

    Marc W

    Marc W

    Marc W

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2017
    Messages:
    292
    Likes Received:
    193
    Location:
    Colorado
    My question is what would a hand propped, flywheel drive Type 4 weigh? Pops says a Type 1 long block is 116 lbs, and his 1835cc engine weighs 141 lbs, so the accessories weigh about 25 lbs. If a Type 4 long block weighs 142 lbs. and we add 25 lbs. for accessories then the engine will weigh about 167 lbs. That doesn't sound so bad to me. My Type 1 with Diehl case and electric start weighs around that. Plus I have the weight of a remote oil cooler and remote oil filter to add to that. The Type 4 mounts the filter and cooler on the case and that would eliminate the weight of the plumbing and the oil in the plumbing. Plus I could get rid of the battery.

    William Wynn says a hand prop Corvair weighs 205 lbs. That is to heavy for my plane. I am pretty sure a Subaru weighs more than that.

    Weighing my engine is on the list of things to do. It's stuck under the bench and it will take some time to drag it out.

    Is there a good Type 4 rebuild manual available?
     
  7. Sep 23, 2019 #7

    Marc W

    Marc W

    Marc W

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2017
    Messages:
    292
    Likes Received:
    193
    Location:
    Colorado
    I weighed the engine. It weighs 164 lbs with the flywheel, valve covers and bails, and lower cooling tin. I don't know if there is any oil in it. This site: https://ratwell.com/technical/Weights.html#longblock says the flywheel weighs 14.5 lbs. So the long block I have should be about 150 lbs without the flywheel. So if we add the 25 lbs for carb, ignition, etc. we have 175 lbs. Not far off from what a Type 1 with electrical system weighs especially if you include the battery.

    Mark Langford bought his Type 4 from Mark Stephens. Stephens went out of business but he appears to be back since he now has a website: http://markstephenshighperformance.com/. The prices I see on his website do not appear to be incredibly high. I know there is more to it than that but it doesn't look that expensive considering it is for an aircraft. I daresay it would cost less than a Pegasus O-100.
     
  8. Sep 23, 2019 #8

    TFF

    TFF

    TFF

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2010
    Messages:
    11,527
    Likes Received:
    3,228
    Location:
    Memphis, TN
    Flywheel drive is your only option. What I see is you are on your own. No parts available on the airplane side. How big of an engine do you expect to build over your 2180? Without making it much larger, you are not going to gain a lot of extra power. 2600? Anything less is not going to be worth the effort. Doable for sure, but it’s not a lot of pay and play. Draw through normalized turbo sure would be awesome. If leaks are giving you thoughts, I would reseal it. Cheaper than a whole new engine.
     
  9. Sep 23, 2019 #9

    Pops

    Pops

    Pops

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2013
    Messages:
    7,018
    Likes Received:
    5,914
    Location:
    USA.
    With the weight, cost and power produced, I would build a Corvair engine.
     
  10. Sep 23, 2019 #10

    Mcmark

    Mcmark

    Mcmark

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2013
    Messages:
    269
    Likes Received:
    126
    Location:
    Owings, MD
    Jake Raby, the type4store.com is one of the most knowledgeable about that engine period. Don’t know him personally but has great rep.
     
  11. Sep 23, 2019 #11

    Marc W

    Marc W

    Marc W

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2017
    Messages:
    292
    Likes Received:
    193
    Location:
    Colorado
    I agree. It would have to be at least 2600 to make it worthwhile. Stephens shows a 2650. That is a 21% increase over the 2180. Stephens also shows a 2922 for a couple hundred more than the 2650. That is 34% bigger than a 2180! All else being equal, for $200 I would go bigger. Another thing is that it isn't possible to get sea level HP here and I don't like running at high RPM's so it would not be run hard.

    You do give me an idea though. I could ditch the electrical system on the 2180 and install a turbo. That could turn out to be a wash weight wise at the cost of a different kind of complexity. I don't really care about speed. I would just like to have better climb for flying around the mountains.
     
  12. Sep 23, 2019 #12

    radfordc

    radfordc

    radfordc

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2008
    Messages:
    1,223
    Likes Received:
    490
  13. Sep 23, 2019 #13

    Marc W

    Marc W

    Marc W

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2017
    Messages:
    292
    Likes Received:
    193
    Location:
    Colorado
    Thanks, Radford. I had seen reference to the accident at Oxnard but hadn't seen the SB. The tapered spacer looks like a Mickey Mouse solution anyway. To much taper and there just isn't much there for the prop hub to grab onto. Using a flywheel drive would eliminate that problem.
     

Share This Page

arrow_white