• Welcome aboard HomebuiltAirplanes.com, your destination for connecting with a thriving community of more than 10,000 active members, all passionate about home-built aviation. Dive into our comprehensive repository of knowledge, exchange technical insights, arrange get-togethers, and trade aircrafts/parts with like-minded enthusiasts. Unearth a wide-ranging collection of general and kit plane aviation subjects, enriched with engaging imagery, in-depth technical manuals, and rare archives.

    For a nominal fee of $99.99/year or $12.99/month, you can immerse yourself in this dynamic community and unparalleled treasure-trove of aviation knowledge.

    Embark on your journey now!

    Click Here to Become a Premium Member and Experience Homebuilt Airplanes to the Fullest!

drop atomization and spraying direction in agriculture airplanes

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

aircraft

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2013
Messages
55
Location
Fremont, CA/USA
This topic may not fit here, but experience told me there were all kinds of experts in this forum!

During pesticide spraying a drop will atomize further if it has a relative speed to the air around it. The high air speed causes high air shear that will "tear" a drop apart. This kind of atomization usually is not desired because fine drops take a longer time to settle and are prone to drift and evaporation.

I guess for this reason the spraying direction is rearward in ag airplanes. If the airspeed of the airplane is V0, and the nozzle exit speed of a drop is V1, then the relative speed of the drop to air will be V0-V1, the difference between these two speeds. Is this the reason the spraying direction is reaward? Is it usually the case to match V0 to V1 so the difference V0-V1 will be small? Is there a limit how big this difference can be?
 
Back
Top