• Welcome aboard HomebuiltAirplanes.com, your destination for connecting with a thriving community of more than 10,000 active members, all passionate about home-built aviation. Dive into our comprehensive repository of knowledge, exchange technical insights, arrange get-togethers, and trade aircrafts/parts with like-minded enthusiasts. Unearth a wide-ranging collection of general and kit plane aviation subjects, enriched with engaging imagery, in-depth technical manuals, and rare archives.

    For a nominal fee of $99.99/year or $12.99/month, you can immerse yourself in this dynamic community and unparalleled treasure-trove of aviation knowledge.

    Embark on your journey now!

    Click Here to Become a Premium Member and Experience Homebuilt Airplanes to the Fullest!

Compression or tension

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Alan Waters

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2009
Messages
534
Location
Conover N.C.
We have an airplane sitting static. The upper part of the engine mount is held in tension while the lower part is held in compression. Now, when the airplane is in straight and level flight, is there a point where all of the engine mount is in tension. Discounting the P factor which would place the right side of the mount in tension and the left side in compression. Since the tail acts as a lever pushing down at all speeds it seems to me the mount would never be completely in tension except when flying straight up, as in the case of an aerobatic airplane. HBA member BUCKY is going to post some photos of an engine mount which he replaced on a Piper due to cracks. The cracks are on the right side, the tension side, which makes sense to me. I would think a crack would occur sooner in tension than in compression. What do you think? Regards to all, Alan
 
Back
Top