• Welcome aboard HomebuiltAirplanes.com, your destination for connecting with a thriving community of more than 10,000 active members, all passionate about home-built aviation. Dive into our comprehensive repository of knowledge, exchange technical insights, arrange get-togethers, and trade aircrafts/parts with like-minded enthusiasts. Unearth a wide-ranging collection of general and kit plane aviation subjects, enriched with engaging imagery, in-depth technical manuals, and rare archives.

    For a nominal fee of $99.99/year or $12.99/month, you can immerse yourself in this dynamic community and unparalleled treasure-trove of aviation knowledge.

    Embark on your journey now!

    Click Here to Become a Premium Member and Experience Homebuilt Airplanes to the Fullest!

.016 And .025 Gusset tests

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

proppastie

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2012
Messages
6,426
Location
NJ
Failure test of gussets for aluminum tube assembly.....When calculating Euler for these cross sections the critical failure is way above the Fcy or .7Fcy......so according to Bruhn the proper number is .7Fcy. I was only checking the flat sheet metal assembly for crippling....The square tube test was a general test to see what or if the book calculations made sense.....The round tube test are actual size elements of my spar structure.

I am not sure if the calculations are the appropriate ones and the geometric imperfections of the test could be a reason for the difference between any theory and the actual number ....however there certainly will be geometric imperfections in any actual assembly so I am hopping these test are valid.

1676583171007.png
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20230216_154945.jpg
    IMG_20230216_154945.jpg
    1.3 MB · Views: 0
  • IMG_20230216_095816.jpg
    IMG_20230216_095816.jpg
    1.5 MB · Views: 0
  • IMG_20230214_144915.jpg
    IMG_20230214_144915.jpg
    1,000.2 KB · Views: 0
  • HBA GUSSET.xls
    52 KB · Views: 0
  • 1676582089343.png
    1676582089343.png
    96.6 KB · Views: 1
Last edited:
Back
Top