Close coupled tails.

HomeBuiltAirplanes.com

Help Support HomeBuiltAirplanes.com:

captarmour

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2013
Messages
368
Location
Roseau, Dominica.
I have wondered for some time why so many of us like long coupled canards when close coupled canards actually increase the lift on the wing by probable 'slot' effect, as well as the circulation of both airfoils probably benefiting each other, while long coupled canards decrease the lift by creating a downwash for the wing to fly in.

however the idea of close coupled tails came to mind when i saw the rcpowers F35(very close coupled tail) model had a problem in that it did not want to land it wanted to glide forever although it is a low AR aircraft.

is something happening that i dont know about?
 

Himat

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 5, 2011
Messages
2,868
Location
Norway
I have wondered for some time why so many of us like long coupled canards when close coupled canards actually increase the lift on the wing by probable 'slot' effect, as well as the circulation of both airfoils probably benefiting each other, while long coupled canards decrease the lift by creating a downwash for the wing to fly in.
..
Why “long coupled canards”?

Ease of design. Next on the list is centre of gravity placement and CG range. A short coupled canard could be done, but it does take more time and effort. Considerable more time and effort if the possible gains are to be realised.
 

captarmour

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2013
Messages
368
Location
Roseau, Dominica.
Ok I could see that with a low sweep wing, I guess I'm thinking delta where the close coupled canard is relatively far from the AC of the delta. Understood.

the same thing would apply with a close tail, a long chord wing would probably work better. I guess the thought is really about making a relatively low AR efficient, to take advantage of its strength to weight ratio.
 
Top