• This community needs YOUR help today!

    With the ever-increasing fees of maintaining our vibrant community (servers, software, domains, email), we need help.
    We need more Supporting Members today.

    Please invest back into this community to help spread our love and knowledge of home-built aviation.

    Why support HomebuiltAirplanes.com?

    • Dive into our comprehensive repository of knowledge, exchange technical insights, arrange get-togethers, and trade aircrafts/parts with like-minded enthusiasts.
    • Unearth a wide-ranging collection of general and kit plane aviation subjects, enriched with engaging imagery, in-depth technical manuals, and rare archives.
    • Enjoy enhanced account features that enrich your experience, including the ability to disable ads.

    This is your chance to make a difference. Become a Supporting Member today:

    Upgrade Now

GA's tapered and swept tail for aesthetic reason?

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Anna Tian

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2013
Messages
124
Location
Zurich
Hi, GA usually use tapered and swept tail. The tail usually has lower AR than the wing and when AR is low, the straight wing Oswald efficiency factor is already quite close to 1 and the tapered design brings manufacturing difficulties. So I can’t see a lot sense to taper the tail. Swept tail can slightly increase the effective dihedral but it is far more efficiently to increase the effective dihedral by increasing the wing dihedral angle. So I also don’t see a sense to make the tail swept. So I’m wondering are GA’s tails usually tapered and swept only for the aesthetic reason?
 
Back
Top