flyvulcan
Well-Known Member
Hi everyone,
I am doing some market research on a potential alternative to the Rotax 912 engine and would like your feedback on what your priorities are when comparing two engines to buy.
Please start this poll on the assumption that you intend to buy a Rotax 912 series engine to install in your project (no other engines are under consideration for this poll), but when ready to put your money down, you are offered an alternative.
The alternative will bolt directly on to your existing Rotax engine mount with the prop flange being located identically to the Rotax prop flange, so no change in engine mount/prop flange geometry (although weight and dimensions are different).
The comparable specifications for the Rotax 912ULS and the alternative engine are listed in the following table.
I ask that you do two things:
Clearly at the end of the day, folks will want to see the alternative and will probably need evidence that the alternative is reliable, well supported etc., but for now, please just go on the data in the table.
I have taken the Rotax data from spec sheets and the www. The TBO cost may be way out for the Rotax. I have seen different figures quoted...
I cannot elaborate on the alternative engine, but information will become available in due course, should this engine reach maturity. And sorry, I cannot answer any questions about it at the moment so don't be offended if I do not respond to questions about the engine.
Many thanks for your input.
Dave
I am doing some market research on a potential alternative to the Rotax 912 engine and would like your feedback on what your priorities are when comparing two engines to buy.
Please start this poll on the assumption that you intend to buy a Rotax 912 series engine to install in your project (no other engines are under consideration for this poll), but when ready to put your money down, you are offered an alternative.
The alternative will bolt directly on to your existing Rotax engine mount with the prop flange being located identically to the Rotax prop flange, so no change in engine mount/prop flange geometry (although weight and dimensions are different).
The comparable specifications for the Rotax 912ULS and the alternative engine are listed in the following table.
I ask that you do two things:
- List the items in decreasing order of importance to you as the buyer when comparing the two powerplants, based on the information contained in the table; and
- State which powerplant would be your preference, based on the supplied information.
Clearly at the end of the day, folks will want to see the alternative and will probably need evidence that the alternative is reliable, well supported etc., but for now, please just go on the data in the table.
I have taken the Rotax data from spec sheets and the www. The TBO cost may be way out for the Rotax. I have seen different figures quoted...
I cannot elaborate on the alternative engine, but information will become available in due course, should this engine reach maturity. And sorry, I cannot answer any questions about it at the moment so don't be offended if I do not respond to questions about the engine.
Many thanks for your input.
Dave
# | Parameter | Rotax 912ULS | Alternative |
1 | Cost (complete with ancillaries) | c$24k | c$24k |
2 | Max. Power (hp) | 100 | 140 |
3 | Max. cont. power | 95 | 120 |
4 | Installed weight (lbs) | c150 | c80 |
5 | Dimensions (in.) | 23" x 22" x 15" | 30" x 10" x 10" |
6 | TBO (hrs) | 2000 | 2000 |
7 | TBO cost | c$8000 | c$3000 |
8 | Fuel consumption (at 100hp - USG/hr) | 7.1 | 8.5 |
9 | Fuel types | Mogas, Avgas | Diesel, Kerosene Jet A etc. |
10 | Max prop rpm | 2450 | 2400-3500 range |
11 | Brand name | Rotax | No-name |