• Welcome aboard HomebuiltAirplanes.com, your destination for connecting with a thriving community of more than 10,000 active members, all passionate about home-built aviation. Dive into our comprehensive repository of knowledge, exchange technical insights, arrange get-togethers, and trade aircrafts/parts with like-minded enthusiasts. Unearth a wide-ranging collection of general and kit plane aviation subjects, enriched with engaging imagery, in-depth technical manuals, and rare archives.

    For a nominal fee of $99.99/year or $12.99/month, you can immerse yourself in this dynamic community and unparalleled treasure-trove of aviation knowledge.

    Embark on your journey now!

    Click Here to Become a Premium Member and Experience Homebuilt Airplanes to the Fullest!

R2800 on a Fly Baby

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Mike von S.

Well-Known Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2017
Messages
570
I am exploring the possibility of mounting my Rotec R2800 on a stock Fly Baby fuselage. This flies in the face of the accepted wisdom in the Fly Baby community that the Rotec is too heavy, too nose-heavy (due to the planetary gear in front), too unreliable (colored by the French U-tube videos we’ve all seen), and even, according to Harry Fenton, Continental engine guru, too pretty!

But…when I run the numbers on CG, I conclude the R2800 should work on a stock Fly Baby, even for a pilot as light as myself (140).

Positioning the battery behind the pilot seat adds some additional margin.

For a heavier pilot, CG is less of an issue but one would want to register the ship with max gross at least 1050 and probably 1100 (both of which have been used by some Fly Baby builders in the past).

My current thinking, but more research to be done.
 
Back
Top