• Welcome aboard HomebuiltAirplanes.com, your destination for connecting with a thriving community of more than 10,000 active members, all passionate about home-built aviation. Dive into our comprehensive repository of knowledge, exchange technical insights, arrange get-togethers, and trade aircrafts/parts with like-minded enthusiasts. Unearth a wide-ranging collection of general and kit plane aviation subjects, enriched with engaging imagery, in-depth technical manuals, and rare archives.

    For a nominal fee of $99.99/year or $12.99/month, you can immerse yourself in this dynamic community and unparalleled treasure-trove of aviation knowledge.

    Embark on your journey now!

    Click Here to Become a Premium Member and Experience Homebuilt Airplanes to the Fullest!

Flying flea stability

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

pictsidhe

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Messages
8,815
Location
North Carolina
I'm seriously considering a flying flea FAR103 ship. I'd like something small and foolproof to fly.
There appears to be a stability issue with fleas, there is quite a bit of anecdotal evidence that once in a while, a flea nosedives into the ground, turbulence is often blamed. Without getting into a Punch and Judy 'Oh yes they do', 'Oh no they don't' debate, for the purposes of this thread, can we just assume that they do? I am aware of the early HM14 nosedive problem which was 'solved'. I say 'solved' as I wonder if the problem was merely pushed outside of most normal flight conditions.

I've seen a few explanations, but none of them really work for me. One is that front wing stalls in positive lift and just doesn't unstall. I can't see how that might be statically stable.
So I'll kick off with my current pet hypothesis. A disturbance causes a negative lift stall, the rear wing, now in the wake of the front wing then stalls too. If the event has pitched the nose down far enough, you have a negative g deep stall. 'Merde!' is really not going to be a strong enough expletive if this is stable.
 
Back
Top