XFLR5 update

HomeBuiltAirplanes.com

Help Support HomeBuiltAirplanes.com:

Aerowerx

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2011
Messages
5,567
Location
Marion, Ohio
Cm...what about it ?
IIRC the negative Cm means that it will pitch up into a stall. Which means a H-tail is needed to counteract the Cm of the wing.

You already have a very high AoA of 18 degrees. With out seeing the polar plots it is hard to say what it is doing.
 

ScaleBirdsPaul

Active Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2015
Messages
38
Location
Connecticut
IIRC the negative Cm means that it will pitch up into a stall. Which means a H-tail is needed to counteract the Cm of the wing.

You already have a very high AoA of 18 degrees. With out seeing the polar plots it is hard to say what it is doing.
Normal convention is negative Cm is a nose down moment. At 18+ degrees AoA I’m guessing he’s well past the linear increase in Cl and XFLR is throwing out weird results.
 

Speedboat100

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2018
Messages
1,059
Location
Europe
IIRC the negative Cm means that it will pitch up into a stall. Which means a H-tail is needed to counteract the Cm of the wing.

You already have a very high AoA of 18 degrees. With out seeing the polar plots it is hard to say what it is doing.

Yes here are 0-12 degs AOA polars.

polars.jpg
 

Topaz

Super Moderator
Staff member
Log Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2005
Messages
14,110
Location
Orange County, California
Inviscid results aren't terribly accurate. Calculate a Reynolds number and Mach number and run a polar for those conditions.
 

Aerowerx

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2011
Messages
5,567
Location
Marion, Ohio
Your polars show the max CL of about 1.45 at AoA of 10 degrees. I wouldn't trust anything beyond that.

And as Topaz said, inviscid isn't that good.

Remember this is a mathematical simulation of reality. The results are only reasonable* within the linear, not turbulent regions.

--------
*insert your own definition of reasonable here.
 

ScaleBirdsPaul

Active Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2015
Messages
38
Location
Connecticut
Looks like there’s an update on a new version of XFLR5 called flow5. Looks to be much more powerful but will be a paid software.

https://flow5.tech/

There’s a series of YouTube videos that I’m working through to see if it seems worth the price.
 

Aerowerx

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2011
Messages
5,567
Location
Marion, Ohio
Looks like there’s an update on a new version of XFLR5 called flow5. Looks to be much more powerful but will be a paid software.

https://flow5.tech/

There’s a series of YouTube videos that I’m working through to see if it seems worth the price.
Not really a version of XFLR5.

There are several related programs, all from the same developer. My conjecture is that they used the same basic algorithms to solve the fluid dynamics, but each is tailored for different purposes.
 
Top