• Welcome aboard HomebuiltAirplanes.com, your destination for connecting with a thriving community of more than 10,000 active members, all passionate about home-built aviation. Dive into our comprehensive repository of knowledge, exchange technical insights, arrange get-togethers, and trade aircrafts/parts with like-minded enthusiasts. Unearth a wide-ranging collection of general and kit plane aviation subjects, enriched with engaging imagery, in-depth technical manuals, and rare archives.

    For a nominal fee of $99.99/year or $12.99/month, you can immerse yourself in this dynamic community and unparalleled treasure-trove of aviation knowledge.

    Embark on your journey now!

    Click Here to Become a Premium Member and Experience Homebuilt Airplanes to the Fullest!

Why not more UL biplanes?

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Inverted Vantage

Formerly Unknown Target
Joined
Jun 19, 2008
Messages
1,116
Just curious; I'm aware of the higher drag/slower speed restrictions of the type, but I thought in UL's that wouldn't matter much, and the benefits (shorter wingspan for a given amount of lift, which you need a LOT of in UL's to get into reg speeds), and lighter box structure, would outweigh that for the application?

Also, any pictures of biplanes supported without wires? I've seen a few but only like one or two of them; one is a Reno racer and the other was a "star strut" aircraft posted on this forum.

Thanks!
 
Back
Top