rv6ejguy
Well-Known Member
Pretty interesting video:
He did mention it had hanger rash but totally repairable. I do like that low wing single seat I think it's the BD-6 ?Yes! Did i understood correctly that the bd-10 displayed here flew 126 hours? I always read it was flawed and not really airworthy?
Seriously hope there's no thoughts of flying the 10...PFI constructed a production configuration left side fuselage tail boom, complete with vertical and horizontal tail components. The unit was built to the same configuration as the accident aircraft components. This assembly was then mounted on a test fixture, with strain gages installed on the vertical stabilizer spars. The vertical tail was then loaded to failure. The failure mode and separation point was the same as that seen on the accident aircraft left vertical tail assembly. The test revealed that the vertical stabilizer spars began to yield at 40 percent of the failure load limit supplied by BJC (see AIRCRAFT INFORMATION section). Spar failure occurred at 65 percent of the BJC supplied load limit.
Can you provide a source for that? Might be interesting reading.Seriously hope there's no thoughts of flying the 10...
Can you provide a source for that? Might be interesting reading.
Justin
Watching Burt at Oshkosh 2019 I thought he was complaining about Raptor selling deposits before testing. But I guess it was Bede. He didn't mention names.Perspective on past.
I posted that on the Bede forum and is was panned as 'one sided'.Perspective on past.
Wonder what source of money his pay check came from ....Watching Burt at Oshkosh 2019 I thought he was complaining about Raptor selling deposits before testing. But I guess it was Bede. He didn't mention names.
Nope, never thought much of the BD 5.BJC, what was the check number of your deposit?
Ntsb report seems to be 404'ing.