Wanted :186 cu in, Radial Y ; (30 hp) @ 1,300 rpm -- !

Discussion in 'The light stuff area' started by Bille Floyd, Jan 5, 2020.

Help Support HomeBuiltAirplanes Forum by donating:

  1. Jan 7, 2020 #21

    Bille Floyd

    Bille Floyd

    Bille Floyd

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2019
    Messages:
    133
    Likes Received:
    47
    80Lb with the E-start , is just too much weight ; everything
    else about that engine , is simply Awesome !!!!!!!

    At that rpm ; i bet it would go a LOoooooong time between rebuilds ?

    Bille
     
  2. Jan 7, 2020 #22

    Victor Bravo

    Victor Bravo

    Victor Bravo

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2014
    Messages:
    6,596
    Likes Received:
    5,376
    Location:
    KWHP, Los Angeles CA, USA
    The Verner is a specialty engine that offers something specific that other engines don't. Other engines offer specific things that the Verner doesn't (and can't,and shouldn't).

    Just like nuts and bolts, girlfriends, cars, and restaurants... you pick the right choice for what your specific need is :)
     
  3. Jan 7, 2020 #23

    cluttonfred

    cluttonfred

    cluttonfred

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Messages:
    6,879
    Likes Received:
    2,516
    Location:
    World traveler
    Bille, what are you building that 80 lb is too heavy for a four-stroke engine? Is this for a Part 103 ultralight?

     
  4. Jan 7, 2020 #24

    Dana

    Dana

    Dana

    Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2007
    Messages:
    8,847
    Likes Received:
    3,191
    Location:
    CT, USA
    The model engine is turing 4500 rpm instead of 2200, turning a 42" prop. Add a reduction drive for a bigger prop and it would probably double the weight of the engine.

    That's about what a reliable engine in that HP range is going to weigh. Cuyuna (35HP), Rotax 447 (40HP), half VW (30-40HP) are all around 85#.

    Rpm isn't the only thing that goes into rebuild time. Internal stresses, vibration, etc., all play a part.
     
  5. Jan 7, 2020 #25

    rotax618

    rotax618

    rotax618

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2005
    Messages:
    747
    Likes Received:
    305
    Location:
    Evans Head Australia
    If 2,300rpm is all that is required, maybe A very lightweight Radial could be built using computer controlled solenoid valves, injection and ignition. It would eliminate the complex camshaft gear drives, cam, pushrods rocker gear, springs and give increased efficiency not having to drive those parts.
     
    sotaro and delta like this.
  6. Jan 7, 2020 #26

    Victor Bravo

    Victor Bravo

    Victor Bravo

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2014
    Messages:
    6,596
    Likes Received:
    5,376
    Location:
    KWHP, Los Angeles CA, USA
    Let's go about this another way... or, as Monty Python used to say: "And now for something completely different" -

    Since you're a hang glider pilot and talking about light weight as a priority, I'm going to make an assumption that what you want to achieve is somewhere in the ultralight - powered HG - self-launch UL glider spectrum.

    I'm suggesting that you allow your desired RPM specification to be applied to the propeller, rather than the crankshaft. If you allow this to be part of the discussion, then your engine selection becomes a whole lot easier and more achievable. Because there's a whole truckload of engines that are designed and proven for this type of aircraft and fairly low weight.
     
    sotaro likes this.
  7. Jan 7, 2020 #27

    ScaleBirdsScott

    ScaleBirdsScott

    ScaleBirdsScott

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2015
    Messages:
    1,115
    Likes Received:
    729
    Location:
    Uncasville, CT
    If the goal is light and lightweight, whatever happened to the Compact Radial Engines 3 cylinder 2-stroker?
     
  8. Jan 7, 2020 #28

    addicted2climbing

    addicted2climbing

    addicted2climbing

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2012
    Messages:
    992
    Likes Received:
    291
    Location:
    Glendale, CA
    I have been looking for the same thing and been researching engines and looking at old legacy engine plans and designs. I don't have much background in IC engine design, but I am sure I could pick Pete's brain a bit since he just went through this. I do have the engineering and CAD background to at least give it a cursory try. However, knowing the long road Pete went through unsure if I am up to going down it just yet. However, being recently self employed I now have a bit more time to devote to developing aviation related items.

    To keep costs down, I have been looking to build either a small boxer or 3 cylinder radial using either Citroen 2CV cylinders and piston kits or Briggs/honda clone cylinder and piston kits. Wonder if I can work with Pete to offer a 65% sized set of his cases paired to the 2CV or Briggs cylinders. It would not compete with him and fill a niche he left out. However he may have wanted to in the future... But I did do some CAD for him and redid his Crank to make it more friendly for Casting so maybe he will be willing to work with me a bit on this time depending.

    Before I do go down this road I plan to buy a Vegas Karts 625 and put a PSRU on it and see what I can get out of it. Maybe with a balance master I can cut down on some of the vibration of the large single piston. Lots of ideas and for once in my life a bit of time and capitol to try a few things.
     
    sotaro, GeeZee and Matt D Murdoch like this.
  9. Jan 8, 2020 #29

    Dana

    Dana

    Dana

    Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2007
    Messages:
    8,847
    Likes Received:
    3,191
    Location:
    CT, USA
    Compact Radial Engines was bought by a Chinese outfit but they only seem to be selling single and two cylinder engines now. But even when it was still in Canada the radial (originally Koenig) was "special order only" with l-o-o-o-o-n-g lead times.

    Seems to be me there are two reasons to want a radial engine: The wonderful sound, or the look. The sound is lost if the engine turns at a higher rpm or is a 2-stroke. The look is easier if you don't care about the sound, take three 15HP (or larger) 2-strokes and gear them (at a suitable ratio, perhaps 3:1) together to a single crankshaft.
     
  10. Jan 8, 2020 #30

    Bille Floyd

    Bille Floyd

    Bille Floyd

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2019
    Messages:
    133
    Likes Received:
    47
    Yes Light weight ! Where the biggest safety aspect would be : the
    same #'s as an SGS 1-26 , (under 45-mph) ; but i could land , kinda
    really Short , compared to those guys.

    40 pounds Max weight , and an Hp of 27 + ; gimme that , and a folding prop, and
    i can climb safely out of my buddies airport in Moore Idaho, 5,500 ASL
    which is at the base of a 60 mile long soaring range for gliders that's an average
    3k of vertical and faces SW. I'm a soaring junkie ; that's why Need it so bad) !!

    Bille
    I want a dirty one of these :
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Jan 8, 2020
    jedi likes this.
  11. Jan 8, 2020 #31

    addicted2climbing

    addicted2climbing

    addicted2climbing

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2012
    Messages:
    992
    Likes Received:
    291
    Location:
    Glendale, CA
    Im an ex sailplane and HG pilot and have been following the build of that Atos glider. Also like the atos based trikes. Im building a Zigolo for similar reasons but with much less practical performance.
     
  12. Jan 8, 2020 #32

    Bille Floyd

    Bille Floyd

    Bille Floyd

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2019
    Messages:
    133
    Likes Received:
    47
    There is an Atos trike for sale on hanggliding dot org/classifieds ; wish
    i had $10-K to burn , (it's a VX) and built for tandem loads, (550-Lb) payload
    so ya got plenty of weight to burn . That glider's L/d is close
    to 20:1 ; my Exxtacy is only good for 15 to 17:1, depending
    on who you believe ? The same guy designed both wings .

    If i were using my Exxtacy build in Las Vegas , (at 2,700 ASL)
    i could get away with 16 to 17-Hp with a folding prop ; but
    i was told i Need a minimum of 25-Hp to get off the
    ground at 5,500-ASL. I'm not a fat guy ; but i do weigh
    near 205-Lb. (sad)

    Bille
     
  13. Jan 8, 2020 #33

    Victor Bravo

    Victor Bravo

    Victor Bravo

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2014
    Messages:
    6,596
    Likes Received:
    5,376
    Location:
    KWHP, Los Angeles CA, USA
    Forgive me for jumping ahead to the end of the conversation (usually the journey is the fun part), but after all the shouting dies down you are going to wind up with a Simonini, Polini, Vittorazi or other paramotor industry 2 stroke with a belt drive on it... just like all the other guys who want high power and low weight are using. Sorry, that's where the solution is for this mission.
     
    Last edited: Jan 8, 2020
  14. Jan 8, 2020 #34

    Tiger Tim

    Tiger Tim

    Tiger Tim

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2013
    Messages:
    3,009
    Likes Received:
    1,713
    Location:
    Thunder Bay
    Kinda like this but bigger?

    upload_2020-1-8_12-32-45.jpeg
     
    blane.c likes this.
  15. Jan 8, 2020 #35

    poormansairforce

    poormansairforce

    poormansairforce

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2017
    Messages:
    768
    Likes Received:
    248
    Location:
    Just an Ohioan
    I started a thread on this idea and was told I'm nuts! Good luck.:grave:
     
    blane.c and ScaleBirdsScott like this.
  16. Jan 24, 2020 #36

    Aesquire

    Aesquire

    Aesquire

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2014
    Messages:
    2,384
    Likes Received:
    976
    Location:
    Rochester, NY, USA
    Working the numbers for my own ( no details to avoid drift ) pt103 airthing, in the 35-40 hp and I keep getting a handful of 2 cylinder 2 strokes, or a Verner 3V. All about the same weight with electric start & PSRU. That's 1/3 total empty weight. ( 80 pounds )

    The lower power single cylinder engines can get down to under 50 pounds or 1/5 empty weight. The paramotor units for example.

    Excuse me while I search for the Atos wing for sale. :)

    http://en.a-i-r.de/atos-motorisierung/ego-trike/?L=1
     
  17. Jan 25, 2020 #37

    Bille Floyd

    Bille Floyd

    Bille Floyd

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2019
    Messages:
    133
    Likes Received:
    47
    The Atos will only "Need" 25Hp , to get off the ground
    at 5,500ASL ; and at $3K, the Moster 185+ will give Ya
    27Hp , with reduction, and under 40Lb .

    Me personally ---- i'm kinda leaning towards the Valch Vm 420cc R5
    radial ; 25Hp at only 26Lb ; swings a 43" prop ,direct drive
    and it's a 4-stroke, (i Truly, HATE -- 2-strokes) !!! GURRrrrrr... ...
    Add a reduction, to that Near-No vibration engine ; it would be Amazing !!!


    Bille
     
    Last edited: Jan 25, 2020
  18. Jan 26, 2020 #38

    danmoser

    danmoser

    danmoser

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2010
    Messages:
    633
    Likes Received:
    188
    Location:
    Sandy, Utah, USA
    Blle,
    I agree with your disgust for 2-strokes, in general..
    The most undesirable aspects are:
    1. Low reliability- they can quit unexpectedly
    2. Low TBO- they wear out rather quickly
    3. Noisy- they piss off neighbors
    4. Dirty exhaust- they splatter oily reside on you & your plane

    Newer 2-strokes are definitely better than the old ones, but still..

    Unfortunately, the little 4-stroke engines made for giant scale RC planes share the same problems 1-3.. they might work great for a while, but may not be a very solid long term investment.

    Have you checked out the Bailey V5E 4-stroke?
    http://www.baileyaviation.com/engines.html
    This was the 4-stroke engine of choice on the Ariane Swift'Light motorglider. . One Swift pilot told me he loves it, and thought it was very reliable, but I have no real data on how long they last.
    It's a souped-up 195cc single revving at 8,000RPM, with 3.19:1 PSRU included.
    20.5hp, under 40 lb. even with electric start option. .. Not cheap ~$4,000
     
  19. Jan 26, 2020 #39

    addicted2climbing

    addicted2climbing

    addicted2climbing

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2012
    Messages:
    992
    Likes Received:
    291
    Location:
    Glendale, CA
    The Eos is supposed to be better than the Bailey but its not available yet. The Bailey is hard to find in the USA, unless you know of a few distributors?
     
  20. Jan 26, 2020 #40

    pictsidhe

    pictsidhe

    pictsidhe

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2014
    Messages:
    7,351
    Likes Received:
    2,118
    Location:
    North Carolina
    A lot of the RC 4 strokes share all four negatives. They often run total loss premix oiling...

    The Bailey is based on the GY6 scooter engine.
     

Share This Page

Group Builder
arrow_white