• Welcome aboard HomebuiltAirplanes.com, your destination for connecting with a thriving community of more than 10,000 active members, all passionate about home-built aviation. Dive into our comprehensive repository of knowledge, exchange technical insights, arrange get-togethers, and trade aircrafts/parts with like-minded enthusiasts. Unearth a wide-ranging collection of general and kit plane aviation subjects, enriched with engaging imagery, in-depth technical manuals, and rare archives.

    For a nominal fee of $99.99/year or $12.99/month, you can immerse yourself in this dynamic community and unparalleled treasure-trove of aviation knowledge.

    Embark on your journey now!

    Click Here to Become a Premium Member and Experience Homebuilt Airplanes to the Fullest!

ultralight design for high altitude runway (airfoil, aspect ratio, loading, dihedral)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

skwier

Active Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2015
Messages
39
Location
Colorado, 5400 feet
Beginning a design of an ultralight (US 103) to fly from a base near 5400 feet (1640 m).

Yesterday we had gusts to 39 mph (63 kph) with airs temps to 85 F (30 C) in clear air and no clouds within 10 miles. Take off in those gusts would be foolish, but they came up very suddenly out of a blue sky and you might have to deal with something like that after you were in the air.

Please suggest sensible choices for the following or for other relevant parameters. I am thinking of a high wing tractor with aluminum tubing frame. So far this is of course a conceptual design, to see what is possible; constuction details to follow if it seems reasonable.

air foil section - which one?
wing aspect ratio
wing loading
power loading
dihedral

based on my limited knowledge in this area, I would make some first guesses:

to deal with thin air and hence reduced lift, go to a high L/D wing section, and a higher aspect rato (say 5.3 +) .

to reduce wind-gust-induced roll at low speeds for landing, go to lower aspect ratio ( say 4.0 to 5.0)

to reduce wind-gust-induced roll at all speeds and general better control, go to higher wing loading, say > 4.0 pounds / square feet (on gross weight)

to reduce wind-gust-induced roll at all speeds, no dihedral.

to reduce wind-gust-induced roll at all speeds and general better control, go to higher power per weight,
say < 11.0 lbs per horse power.

Stuart Wier
 
Back
Top