• Welcome aboard HomebuiltAirplanes.com, your destination for connecting with a thriving community of more than 10,000 active members, all passionate about home-built aviation. Dive into our comprehensive repository of knowledge, exchange technical insights, arrange get-togethers, and trade aircrafts/parts with like-minded enthusiasts. Unearth a wide-ranging collection of general and kit plane aviation subjects, enriched with engaging imagery, in-depth technical manuals, and rare archives.

    For a nominal fee of $99.99/year or $12.99/month, you can immerse yourself in this dynamic community and unparalleled treasure-trove of aviation knowledge.

    Embark on your journey now!

    Click Here to Become a Premium Member and Experience Homebuilt Airplanes to the Fullest!

The Vought V-173 "solution" to wing-tip turbulance

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

rtfm

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2008
Messages
3,900
Location
Brisbane, Australia
Hi,
I was watching a History Channel documentary on early aircraft, and heard about Charles Zimmerman's Vought V-173 (and successors). All wings suffer from wing tip vorices and the drag associated with this, but low aspect ratio wings suffer to a relatively greater degree.

According to the documentary, however, Zimmerman overcame this drag:
His solution to the problem (of wing tip vortices) was breathtakingly simple <snip snip> he decided to move the engines to the wing tips so that the propellers pushed the air back under the wing"

I found this fascinating.

The question immediately occured to me - how much propeller slipstream effect would be required to offset the wing tip vortices? And this was followed immediately by another... Depending on how much slipstream would be required, might it not be possible to mount small (electric?) props on the wingtips of an "ordinary" plane to counteract the vortices? Some extra thrust, possibly reduced wing tip drag, and possibly with minimal weight penalty.

Of course, it all depends on how effective this prop slipstream effect would be, and whether the benefits would outweigh the cost/effort/complexity involved.

Worth a few thought-experiments? Anyone keen to put on the white lab coat and indulge in some mental scenarios?

Duncan

A table-napkin example...
Wing-tip electric motors.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top