Shoulder wing unpopularity

Discussion in 'Hangar Flying' started by stanislavz, Nov 9, 2019.

Help Support HomeBuiltAirplanes Forum by donating:

  1. Nov 18, 2019 #141

    Turd Ferguson

    Turd Ferguson

    Turd Ferguson

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Messages:
    4,840
    Likes Received:
    1,753
    Location:
    Upper midwest in a house
    And they put the engine behind the wing which I think is a better deal for balance. It might have done better had the name Cessna been on the dataplate. Despite building good airplanes, AG wasn't a powerhouse in aviation.
     
  2. Nov 19, 2019 #142

    delta

    delta

    delta

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2011
    Messages:
    1,954
    Likes Received:
    197
    Location:
    Brookside Utah
    I guess you could consider this a shoulder wing. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and I'm totally biased but... I think it's a tad better looking than everything I've seen here so far except the cygnet and the one Cr brought up. I'd like to squeze the trigger on this one just 'cause I don't know if it'll work in all the ways I'd like it to....

    last1.JPG last2.JPG last3.JPG last4.JPG last5.JPG
     
    Speedboat100 and cheapracer like this.
  3. Nov 19, 2019 #143

    cheapracer

    cheapracer

    cheapracer

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2013
    Messages:
    5,493
    Likes Received:
    3,848
    Location:
    Australian
  4. Nov 19, 2019 #144

    Aerowerx

    Aerowerx

    Aerowerx

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    Messages:
    5,084
    Likes Received:
    1,391
    Location:
    Marion, Ohio
    Usually? Which leads to the possibility of the spar not being at the CG.

    Why not pick an airfoil such that the spar is just behind the design CG, so that the spar is just behind the seats (side-by-side) and the seats are at the design CG? And don't forget a straight leading edge tapered wing could be an advantage.

    Sounds reasonable to me. Just because no one has done it is not evidence that it can't be done.
     
  5. Nov 19, 2019 #145

    Aerowerx

    Aerowerx

    Aerowerx

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    Messages:
    5,084
    Likes Received:
    1,391
    Location:
    Marion, Ohio
    Looks more like a low wing to me.
     
  6. Nov 19, 2019 #146

    Speedboat100

    Speedboat100

    Speedboat100

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2018
    Messages:
    724
    Likes Received:
    57
    Location:
    Europe

    Short Skyvan as a single seater with shoulder wing would be optimal as it has straight wing ( simple to make ) and twin engines bring the CG back. You can load some cargo in the CG. There may be need to trim it...but it has been designed to fly with large static margin.
     
  7. Nov 19, 2019 #147

    cheapracer

    cheapracer

    cheapracer

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2013
    Messages:
    5,493
    Likes Received:
    3,848
    Location:
    Australian
    Far from an expert, but I believe the NACA 6 series does that?
     
    stanislavz likes this.
  8. Nov 19, 2019 #148

    stanislavz

    stanislavz

    stanislavz

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2016
    Messages:
    321
    Likes Received:
    87
    Location:
    Lt
    Or "artfical" NASA3312 Or 4309/0006 used in Tailwind.. (Just simpler and easier on surface quality.. )
     
  9. Nov 19, 2019 #149

    Speedboat100

    Speedboat100

    Speedboat100

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2018
    Messages:
    724
    Likes Received:
    57
    Location:
    Europe

    Yes thick wing sorta becomes "shoulder wing" !

    Cool design.
     
  10. Nov 19, 2019 #150

    Richard Schubert

    Richard Schubert

    Richard Schubert

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2009
    Messages:
    160
    Likes Received:
    47
    Location:
    Pittsburgh, PA
    This might qualify...
    trident.PNG
     
    stanislavz likes this.
  11. Nov 19, 2019 #151

    stanislavz

    stanislavz

    stanislavz

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2016
    Messages:
    321
    Likes Received:
    87
    Location:
    Lt
    three lifting surface is always an option..

    Some of topic. (i got an tailwind virus, third day feel sick) Kind of taliwind in ul class. (450 mtow / 250 empty 65 km/h stall)

    Nesmith cougar was build lighter to tailwing, to have ok. landing speed without flaps..

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nesmith_Cougar

    567 kg kg mtow / 283 kg empty with 0-235 (108 kg dry)

    The question - If 0-235 substituted by rotax-912 (60 kg dry 48 kg minus ? ) - makes empty weight of 235 kg ? And less fuel / tank - mtow limited to anyway 450kg. And new stall speed is equal to - 85* sqrroot(450/567) = 75.7 km/h. Flaps on Tailwind lowers stall speed from 63mph to 55mph - So in conservative approach - 66.08 km/h with flaps if we assume same CL increase. So add some anti-graviti stripes - and we are at 65 km/h

    And - back to topic - with so lightened engine, fuel tank in wings and tricycle gear and with 4309/0006 airfoil - it will place spar after pilot seat.

    Hard question - How our max speed will suffer ? sqrroot(450/567) ?

    Small problems - here is stated Original tailwind (looks like w10 version) with 55 mph stall at 1300 lbs gw
    [​IMG]

    So - do math com true or not ?
     
    Last edited: Nov 19, 2019
  12. Nov 19, 2019 #152

    Vigilant1

    Vigilant1

    Vigilant1

    Well-Known Member Lifetime Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    4,160
    Likes Received:
    1,884
    Location:
    US
    One problem: When the CAFE team tested the Tailwind, they found that it didn't actually stall at those speeds as listed in the POH (that's why they have the note with the asterisk*). They used a very well calibrated airspeed indicator and found that it stalled appreciably faster, and that the POH number's weren't accurate (at least for that plane). If you've got the whole CAFE report, take a look through it for more info.

    Edited to add: The CAFE folks found that the Tailwind "clean" stall speed (at 1396 lb) was 61.4 kts. In landing configuration (and 1395 lbs) the stall speed they measured was 57.3 kts.

    Here's a link to the CAFE reports, they are excellent.
     
    Last edited: Nov 19, 2019
    stanislavz likes this.
  13. Nov 19, 2019 #153

    stanislavz

    stanislavz

    stanislavz

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2016
    Messages:
    321
    Likes Received:
    87
    Location:
    Lt
    https://buildandfly.shop/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/WITTMAN-TAILWIND-PERFOMANCE-REPORT.pdf

    This one part ?

    [​IMG]
     
  14. Nov 19, 2019 #154

    Vigilant1

    Vigilant1

    Vigilant1

    Well-Known Member Lifetime Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    4,160
    Likes Received:
    1,884
    Location:
    US
  15. Nov 19, 2019 #155

    stanislavz

    stanislavz

    stanislavz

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2016
    Messages:
    321
    Likes Received:
    87
    Location:
    Lt
    Digged deeper on tailwind stall. And no answer. CAFE report was done on kind of custom one, with even shorter wing...

    And more stories on airfoil development from 4309 with flat bottom to 4309/0006 combo. And nice wing tips for better efficiency / low speed handling. Especially when converted from w8 to w8 with w10 wings.. Still briliantly low "frontal area", for such low tech..

    Same on Nesmith..
     
  16. Nov 19, 2019 #156

    Himat

    Himat

    Himat

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2011
    Messages:
    2,811
    Likes Received:
    654
    Location:
    Norway
    Yes, it is possible. The Bolkow Bo 209, MFI-9, MFI-15, SAAB Safari and Mushshak line show. Design a wing with the spar one third from the lading edge the par may be more work, but easier to integrate with the fuselage. The problem is not designing an airplane but selling it. The market for something different from low or high wing is probably pretty small.
     
    cheapracer likes this.
  17. Nov 19, 2019 #157

    Aerowerx

    Aerowerx

    Aerowerx

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    Messages:
    5,084
    Likes Received:
    1,391
    Location:
    Marion, Ohio
    Maybe so, but the problem being discussed was the design, I thought, not marketing.
     
    cheapracer likes this.
  18. Nov 19, 2019 #158

    Lendo

    Lendo

    Lendo

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2013
    Messages:
    359
    Likes Received:
    56
    Location:
    Brisbane
    Himat,
    For a Tandem configuration, we would like the rear passenger or Pilot to have his feet straddle the seat of the front pilot to keep their weight closer together for weight and balance. However the Carry Through Spar may need to go where the rear Pilot's feet are, so that makes the rear Passenger/Pilot more rearward, extending the Cockpit length.
    Alternatively you may use a more heavier and more complex arrangement (forget the name of it) that ties the wing Spar to the fuselage walls. Some larger Passenger Planes have that arrangement.

    For a pusher I've seen the Mid Wing Spar attached to the Engine Firewall.
    George
     
  19. Nov 19, 2019 #159

    Aerowerx

    Aerowerx

    Aerowerx

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    Messages:
    5,084
    Likes Received:
    1,391
    Location:
    Marion, Ohio
    Not really.

    I thought we were talking about a shoulder wing. The spar carry through would be higher up between the front pilot seat and the rear pilot's instrument panel. The rear pilot's feet would then go under the spar carry through.
     
  20. Nov 20, 2019 #160

    cheapracer

    cheapracer

    cheapracer

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2013
    Messages:
    5,493
    Likes Received:
    3,848
    Location:
    Australian

Share This Page



arrow_white