Replica home builts

Discussion in 'Hangar Flying' started by Little Scrapper, Mar 11, 2019.

Help Support HomeBuiltAirplanes Forum by donating:

  1. Mar 15, 2019 #101

    radfordc

    radfordc

    radfordc

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2008
    Messages:
    1,188
    Likes Received:
    457
    Robert said he though their might be a problem with the wing airfoil....too much sag of the fabric between ribs. Power to weight is also an issue. I'll bet you could buy the plane at a good price!
     
  2. Mar 15, 2019 #102

    Little Scrapper

    Little Scrapper

    Little Scrapper

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2014
    Messages:
    5,349
    Likes Received:
    3,271
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    How many V-Witts have been built? I'm not sure how "historic" it is but it would sorta be a classic I guess. I guess I've never researched it so I'm pretty clueless.
     
  3. Mar 15, 2019 #103

    wwalton

    wwalton

    wwalton

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2006
    Messages:
    61
    Likes Received:
    13
    Location:
    Hendersonville, North Carolina
    I don’t know how many V-Witts have been built or are flying however if you search affordable air racing forum there are a few being built, bought and or flown. Ed’s SuperVee racing competition has several planes being prepared to race including some of Wittman’s VW racer.
    http://affordableairracing.proboards.com/
     
  4. Mar 15, 2019 #104

    TarDevil

    TarDevil

    TarDevil

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2010
    Messages:
    265
    Likes Received:
    124
    Location:
    Coastal North Carolina/USA
    Would love to own this, in a scaled version...

    Boeing-Monomail-Title.jpg
     
  5. Mar 15, 2019 #105

    Tiger Tim

    Tiger Tim

    Tiger Tim

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2013
    Messages:
    2,842
    Likes Received:
    1,582
    Location:
    Thunder Bay
    I'd want it in full scale to haul my friends to fly-ins with me.
     
    TarDevil likes this.
  6. Mar 15, 2019 #106

    Riggerrob

    Riggerrob

    Riggerrob

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2014
    Messages:
    1,141
    Likes Received:
    315
    Location:
    Canada
    Fokker used thick airfoils to hide the deep, wooden box spars in his wings. Fokker was a pioneering builder of cantilever wings. Many of Fokker’s fighters had cantilever wings and outboard interplane struts were installed to pacify generals who preferred wire-braced wings.
     
  7. Mar 15, 2019 #107

    Riggerrob

    Riggerrob

    Riggerrob

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2014
    Messages:
    1,141
    Likes Received:
    315
    Location:
    Canada
    I thought about building a replica of my ex-wife but eventually decided that a battle axe would clash with the rest of the decor in my apartment.
     
    Battler Britton and cluttonfred like this.
  8. Mar 15, 2019 #108

    Tiger Tim

    Tiger Tim

    Tiger Tim

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2013
    Messages:
    2,842
    Likes Received:
    1,582
    Location:
    Thunder Bay
    Bud Davisson makes it sound just lovely.
    http://airbum.com/Pitts/PirepPittsReplica.html
    I think the original was built out of major chunks of a Taylorcraft L-2. If so, the firewall is probably about where the '2' is and you'd sit right around the first white stripe.
    [​IMG]
     
  9. Mar 15, 2019 #109

    Victor Bravo

    Victor Bravo

    Victor Bravo

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2014
    Messages:
    5,890
    Likes Received:
    4,712
    Location:
    KWHP, Los Angeles CA, USA
    The actual real-world hard-ass reality is a one-two punch that has knocked down a lot of dreams :

    1) smaller size replicas usually do not fly as well as the full size airplanes they were derived from, and
    2) the original full size airplanes that inspired us as kids or beckon us from the history books as adults very often did not fly very well to start with.

    I have an acquaintance who is a very high-end test pilot and F-4 combat vetreran, a real live Edwards AFB guy with all the bells and whistles. I'm not physically strong enough to lift his resume'. Someone asked him what airplane was the biggest disappointment in his career, and without hesitation he said "the P-51".

    You can't say all replica aircraft don't fly well, I'm sure there are some that do just fine. I spoke to a guy who has one of the "Criquet" brand replicas of the Fieseler Storch (Rotax 912), and he says it flies well, does almost everything the original did, but fits in a normal size hangar.

    But IMHO before anyone should plunk down money or time on anything like this they owe it to themselves (and their family) to do their due diligence and get one or more expert opinions on what they are going to actually wind up with.
     
    Turd Ferguson and pictsidhe like this.
  10. Mar 15, 2019 #110

    Pops

    Pops

    Pops

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2013
    Messages:
    6,929
    Likes Received:
    5,842
    Location:
    USA.
    There are several homebuilts that in MHO do not fly well.
     
  11. Mar 15, 2019 #111

    Riggerrob

    Riggerrob

    Riggerrob

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2014
    Messages:
    1,141
    Likes Received:
    315
    Location:
    Canada
    ...........................................................
    Sounds like it flew just like the original DH-2!

    Many WW1 airplanes stalled at higher than normal speeds often close to their cruising speed. They only had tail skies and no brakes which meant that they needed assistance to make right turns on the ground. Just another task for mechanics who struggled to keep them airworthy! Even at the best of times, engines were less than reliable.
    Many had tiny rudders. Finally, they were tail-heavy so required constant control inputs to fly straight and level. That aft centre of gravity allowed them to fly faster but some were balanced so far aft that they could not recover from stalls or spins. As many young pilots died in lonely crashes as were shot down.
     
    Last edited: Mar 15, 2019
  12. Mar 15, 2019 #112

    larr

    larr

    larr

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2012
    Messages:
    157
    Likes Received:
    44
    Location:
    markham, ontario, canada
    No.
    Boring History Moment
    Hugo Junkers used his windtunnel to determine that a thick section wing did not have a significantly different drag profile to a thin section wing, a fundamental fact in the development of a cantilever wing. During WWI Idflieg was unhappy with Junkers ability to produce the new cantilever aircraft and forced Junkers and Fokker to work together. Essentially, Fokker stole Junkers technology leading to law suits thet outlived them both.
    Fokker was not hiding anything in the thick wing. It was necessary to have a spar that was strong enough.

    Less OT, only replicas of aircraft up to the 1920's can be reproduced accurately. After that they are too heavy and sub scale replicas are never accurate.
    I don't think there is anything out there that is going to meet any kind of exacting requirement.
    Aviation is always about compromise.
     
  13. Mar 15, 2019 #113

    Riggerrob

    Riggerrob

    Riggerrob

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2014
    Messages:
    1,141
    Likes Received:
    315
    Location:
    Canada
    Hmmmm?
    Fokker installed wooden box spars while Junkers built space frames from aluminum tubing.
     
  14. Mar 15, 2019 #114

    cluttonfred

    cluttonfred

    cluttonfred

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Messages:
    6,350
    Likes Received:
    2,220
    Location:
    World traveler
    Oooh, if we’re going for the separate pilot cockpit and passenger cabin types then I vote for a DH.83 Fox Moth. Full size is not too huge and even at 7/8 scale it could be a three seater. It just has so much raw style. The wings even fold!

    6D872AD3-78F3-4C65-9B45-CBAE2A596805.jpg 6D876CAE-96F1-4BFB-B2AA-E3B0B95AD33E.png BA10E85A-D20B-4B14-9F4A-696D252D4E33.png
     
    TarDevil and MadRocketScientist like this.
  15. Mar 15, 2019 #115

    Riggerrob

    Riggerrob

    Riggerrob

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2014
    Messages:
    1,141
    Likes Received:
    315
    Location:
    Canada
    After WW2, deHavilland of Canada converted war-surplus Tiger Moths to 4-seater Fox Moths.
    Meanwhile Thruston (Australia) converted 17 Tiger Moths to 4-Seater Jackaroos with double-wide Perspex canopies. They advertised it as the “cheapest four-seater airplane!’
    Rollason converted the 18th Jackaroo.

    Considering how many different Tiger Moth replica plans are available, you would only need to widen the fuselage. Mind you, I doubt if a sub-scale replica could carry 4 or 5 people. Three people is more realistic.
     
    Last edited: Mar 16, 2019
    Tiger Tim and cluttonfred like this.
  16. Mar 15, 2019 #116

    Dana

    Dana

    Dana

    Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2007
    Messages:
    8,513
    Likes Received:
    2,925
    Location:
    CT, USA
    For a really obscure WWI plane, perhaps a Macchi M.5 flying boat...

    [​IMG]


    Or perhaps a Packard-LePere LUSAC II, a US built fighter that was too late to see service:

    [​IMG]
     
  17. Mar 15, 2019 #117

    Aesquire

    Aesquire

    Aesquire

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2014
    Messages:
    2,295
    Likes Received:
    912
    Location:
    Rochester, NY, USA
    Re: Fokker vs. Junkers.

    Fokker's greatest strength was frankly the ability to steal & have his crew improve. He was a great salesman, good pilot, and had a decent sense as to what flies well.

    Junkers developed the thick airfoil. Fokker had a "legal" partnership with Junkers, arranged by the High Command.... And yeah, the lawsuits outlasted the principals.

    Fokker's first cantilever "theft" was having designed wood wings for the famed Triplane. No wires , and the prototype didn't even have outboard interplane struts, as Riggerrob points out. They were added because the pilots were frightened by the wings ( safely ) flexing.

    Yes, it was a concept "stolen" from Junkers. What really annoyed Junkers was that Fokker wasn't making Junkers airplanes, instead he was translating the thick wing shapes in wood, instead of using metal, to make copies that Junkers wanted Fokker to pay royalties on.....

    Fokker did several prototypes with cantilever wings before the D.VII. None were purchased in large quantities. The D.VI https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fokker_D.VI saw some use.

    What is seldom mentioned is that Fokker, being Dutch, wasn't given priority to get the more powerful Mercedes-Benz and BMW inline 6 cylinder engines. Instead he was limited to the German copy of the French rotaries, for most of the war. That's often a hundred horsepower deficit.
     
  18. Mar 15, 2019 #118

    Aesquire

    Aesquire

    Aesquire

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2014
    Messages:
    2,295
    Likes Received:
    912
    Location:
    Rochester, NY, USA
    Re: bad flying machines.

    https://www.amazon.com/Corky-Meyers-Flight-Journal-Corwin/dp/1580072038

    Although WW2 era, this is an excellent book, not on being a test pilot ( although the advice there is priceless ) but on comparing the different planes, from the perspective of a Grumman pro test pilot. With a great sense of humor.

    Several iconic planes do not get high praise. Deathtrap isn't too strong a word, considering training fatalities in the Air Corps.

    One item not commonly discussed in the magazines is the P-47 handbook was very clear, that you should not do a split S under 15,000 feet AGL. The Thunderbolt picked up so much speed in the dive you could not pull out before impact from lower than about 3 miles.

    Consider that when we argue techniques for the "impossible turn". :)


    Also consider that nearly as many died in training in a Sopwith Camel as were shot down. The Sopwith Pup, otoh, was a much easier plane to fly.

    How about these, for inspiration?
    http://www.air-racing-history.com/aircraft/Howard DGA-4 DGA-5.htm
     
  19. Mar 15, 2019 #119

    blane.c

    blane.c

    blane.c

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2015
    Messages:
    3,063
    Likes Received:
    538
    Location:
    capital district NY
    Those "Rotary Engines" were total loss oil, castor oil. Everything behind the propeller blast was coated in oil, I wonder if it had anything to do the development of tracer bullets.
     
  20. Mar 15, 2019 #120

    radfordc

    radfordc

    radfordc

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2008
    Messages:
    1,188
    Likes Received:
    457
    So, you're saying that a P-47 doing a loop has to top out at 15000 ft in order to recover. Now where did I put that BS flag?
     

Share This Page

arrow_white