• Welcome aboard HomebuiltAirplanes.com, your destination for connecting with a thriving community of more than 10,000 active members, all passionate about home-built aviation. Dive into our comprehensive repository of knowledge, exchange technical insights, arrange get-togethers, and trade aircrafts/parts with like-minded enthusiasts. Unearth a wide-ranging collection of general and kit plane aviation subjects, enriched with engaging imagery, in-depth technical manuals, and rare archives.

    For a nominal fee of $99.99/year or $12.99/month, you can immerse yourself in this dynamic community and unparalleled treasure-trove of aviation knowledge.

    Embark on your journey now!

    Click Here to Become a Premium Member and Experience Homebuilt Airplanes to the Fullest!

Redundant Rib Question

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

proppastie

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2012
Messages
6,424
Location
NJ
Shown is a simplified portion of my new wing design in stick figure configuration (actually a truss stress program graphic) …..many members have been removed for clarity......There are 3 ribs and a small portion of the front and rear spars shown in an isometric configuration. The ribs are in red and the spars in green. The middle rib is redundant and has a very low stress compared to the diagonal ribs. I find it necessary to have the middle rib to reduce the column length of the rear spar in the fore and aft direction. The stress program gives an axial load of 5 lb for the center rib and 650 lb for each diagonal rib.


Question: Does this look reasonable as regards loads?...will a redundant member have a very small load?.....or is this just an artifact of the way we calculate the loads and a higher load value should be assigned to the middle rib
 

Attachments

  • hba redundant.png
    hba redundant.png
    22.9 KB · Views: 1
Back
Top