Ranger Autogyro

HomeBuiltAirplanes.com

Help Support HomeBuiltAirplanes.com:

erkki67

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2010
Messages
1,882
Location
Romont / Fribourg / Switzerland
43C2F137-A3EB-4BFE-8CF9-00DBF3EDF3A5.jpeg

Im wondering if this fuselage shape could be transformed into a tractor autogyro?

The Pitbull was a great looking bird, but disappeared unfortunately, but this critter could give an interesting base for a new gyro, no?1
 

rtfm

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2008
Messages
3,195
Location
Brisbane, Australia
I'm sure it would. One would need to engineer the mast geometry and mounts, check the tail proximity to the rotors, balance and so on. But I believe the basic fuse would be about good to go. Engine, seating, undercarriage would all be ready as is I believe...
 

Victor Bravo

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2014
Messages
7,035
Location
KWHP, Los Angeles CA, USA
this critter could give an interesting base for a new gyro, no?1
It certainly looks like it could work. The guy who was selling the Raven Redrive PSRU for the Geo metro engine (Jared or Jerod??) was working on a small tractor gyro about this size.

A four sided narrow pyramid made from steel tube would bolt on to the fuselage section in Erkki's original Ranger fuselage section post. The two forward tubes would mount to the top of the instrument panel area, and the rear tubes wold mount to the top of the seat back, and the apex of the pyramid (rotor hub) would be above the pilot's belly button (pilot CG). Instead of one fin/rudder you would use two small square rudders at the tips of the stabilizer (for rotor clearance). The stabilizer might have to be strengthened a little for these extra loads.

Gyros are far far higher drag than an equivalent airplane, so I am guessing you would want to have a Rotax 503 engine at a minimum, or the McCullough 72HP engine de-rated down to 60.
 

Hot Wings

Grumpy Cynic
HBA Supporter
Log Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2009
Messages
6,901
Location
Rocky Mountains
A four sided narrow pyramid made from steel tube << >>. The two forward tubes would mount to the top of the instrument panel area, and the rear tubes wold mount to the top of the seat back, << >>
Gyros are far far higher drag than an equivalent airplane, so I am guessing you would want to have a Rotax 503 engine at a minimum,
<< >>.
This could work, but then I've always been attracted to tractor gyros. A stiff pyramid will likely require a "slider" rotor head. There are a few part 103 gyros that manage to fly acceptably with 503ish Hp.
 

erkki67

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2010
Messages
1,882
Location
Romont / Fribourg / Switzerland
C7272BE4-60C9-4544-9748-AF862DE30E20.jpeg Hey, and what about the Verner and a Rotor on the Ranger, this is even more crazy!

But it would have a gorgeous look.

If it’s for the the power a single disk Wankel could be used, light in weight, and nowadays fuel and oil consumption is within an acceptable level.
http://www.geiger-motor.de/motoren/

The bare weight of the engine is 42lbs for 50hp.

A running Wankel may weight the double with water oil, coolers , PSRU and and....
 

akwrencher

Well-Known Member
HBA Supporter
Joined
Oct 16, 2012
Messages
1,164
Location
Gustavus, AK
I was checking out the little wings last winter emailed them and plans are available. Seem like a neet design. If I ever get into gyros I would likely start there.
 

erkki67

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2010
Messages
1,882
Location
Romont / Fribourg / Switzerland
In terms of space saving, the gyro is not beatable.

A Voodoo Ranger, would be unbeatable for the design, sturdiness, costs...

What are the Rotors available in the US, off the shelf?

In France, there is AVERSO, producing a certain range of rotorheads and blades.
 

Jstorrshall

Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2013
Messages
20
Location
Melfa, VA USA
Do not try to fly a gyro of your own design unless you are (or hire) a top-notch mechanical engineer specializing in vibrational analysis, That rotor has a huge ensemble of modes and couples to a lot of stuff you don’t normally think of.
 

rotax618

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2005
Messages
800
Location
Evans Head Australia
It doesn’t take long for the naysayers to come out - destroyers of dreams-
There is virtually no evidence that any of the gyro accidents have been caused by “vibration induced failures”. A factory built rotor system (head and blades) are about as safe as a fixed wing, provided that the mast design is not radical then I’m sure someone could safely convert a Ranger type fuselarge to a gyro.
 

Hot Wings

Grumpy Cynic
HBA Supporter
Log Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2009
Messages
6,901
Location
Rocky Mountains
That rotor has a huge ensemble of modes and couples to a lot of stuff you don’t normally think of.
All true, but not requiring a "top-notch engineer". There are plenty of amateurs that have proven it is possible to construct and fly a safe gyroplane.
There are some dead ones too.
It just depends on how willing the designer is to put in the time to do the study needed. It's no different than trying to build a fixed wing from scratch. There is just as much data available to the engineer a safe gyroplane as there is fixed wing - it's just a little harder to find and a little harder to sort the old wives tails from the facts.

It I’m sure someone could safely convert a Ranger type fuselarge to a gyro.
IMHO it wouldn't be all that hard either. The person doing does need to understand the why of autogyros. Physics is physics. Doesn't matter if it spins, flaps or glides in a straight line.
 
2
Top