• Welcome aboard HomebuiltAirplanes.com, your destination for connecting with a thriving community of more than 10,000 active members, all passionate about home-built aviation. Dive into our comprehensive repository of knowledge, exchange technical insights, arrange get-togethers, and trade aircrafts/parts with like-minded enthusiasts. Unearth a wide-ranging collection of general and kit plane aviation subjects, enriched with engaging imagery, in-depth technical manuals, and rare archives.

    For a nominal fee of $99.99/year or $12.99/month, you can immerse yourself in this dynamic community and unparalleled treasure-trove of aviation knowledge.

    Embark on your journey now!

    Click Here to Become a Premium Member and Experience Homebuilt Airplanes to the Fullest!

Part 103 discussion

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

radfordc

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2007
Messages
1,668
When FAR 103 was first written, the limits were based on the then existing ultralights, many (but not all!) of which were converted hang gliders. So, part of the limits were based on existing designs (whether or not based on pilot's lying about their aircraft's weight).

Chuck Slusarczyk who makes the CGS Hawk told me this story. When the FAA was considering Part 103 rules they asked for input from the major UL manufactuers. Lyle Byrum of Quicksilver lobbied hard for the 254 weight restriction. Why...because that's what he thought a Quicksilver could weigh and he wanted other manufactuer's with heavier planes to be at a disadvantage. After the rule was put in place Chuck asked the FAA guy who ran the process what weight the FAA was ready to accept and was told 500 lbs.

Charlie
 
Back
Top