P85 - A New Aircraft

Discussion in 'Chevy' started by Jeffd, Jul 24, 2013.

Help Support HomeBuiltAirplanes Forum by donating:

  1. Jul 24, 2013 #1

    Jeffd

    Jeffd

    Jeffd

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2011
    Messages:
    114
    Likes Received:
    102
    Location:
    Overland Park, Kansas USA
    This one is just weeks away from being on the gear - fuselage ready for the wing install - wing currently being primed while on sawhorses so it can be flipped over easily. The P85 is a derivation of the well tested Radial Rocket airframe, using a small block Chevy firewall forward package. Airframe changes are of course the more streamlined cowl, as well as a different rudder shape and swept wingtips. Focus with this plane is on relatively economical firewall forward cost in the 350-400 HP category. Engine of choice for this first ship is based on a 400 cid Dart SHP block, with a mild build (cowl is sized for a big block Chevy as well). A fixed pitch prop and simple re-drive contribute to the overall economy theme, although I am sure some may opt for a constant speed installation. My personal interest though is in simplicity and economy in this performance class. Even with the fixed pitch prop, the associated power/wing loading should provide great performance. Looking for a top speed of 270+mph with this ship, although the proof is always in the flying, so I am looking forward to seeing how this one peforms. P85 3 View  with logo jpeg.jpg
     
    MARCVINI, bmcj, Topaz and 2 others like this.
  2. Jul 24, 2013 #2

    Topaz

    Topaz

    Topaz

    Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2005
    Messages:
    13,732
    Likes Received:
    5,411
    Location:
    Orange County, California
    Nice! Looks like a beast, and I mean that entirely as a compliment.
     
  3. Jul 25, 2013 #3

    Rienk

    Rienk

    Rienk

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2008
    Messages:
    1,364
    Likes Received:
    190
    Location:
    Santa Maria, CA (SMX)
    Nice looking plane. I look forward to photos (even before completion).
     
  4. Jul 25, 2013 #4

    Aircar

    Aircar

    Aircar

    Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2010
    Messages:
    3,567
    Likes Received:
    367
    Location:
    Melbourne Australia
    In some vague way the lines remind me of the Nuffield Heston racer, very nice. --I'll look for a link.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napier-Heston_Racer (the Napier refers to the Napier Sabre engine (A "H 16" I think ) Beautiful airplane yes ?
     
  5. Jul 25, 2013 #5

    Aircar

    Aircar

    Aircar

    Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2010
    Messages:
    3,567
    Likes Received:
    367
    Location:
    Melbourne Australia
  6. Jul 25, 2013 #6

    TFF

    TFF

    TFF

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2010
    Messages:
    11,639
    Likes Received:
    3,269
    Location:
    Memphis, TN
  7. Jul 25, 2013 #7

    Toobuilder

    Toobuilder

    Toobuilder

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2010
    Messages:
    4,447
    Likes Received:
    3,246
    Location:
    Mojave, Ca
    Neat! FWF pictures would sure be nice...
     
  8. Jul 25, 2013 #8

    autoreply

    autoreply

    autoreply

    Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2009
    Messages:
    10,732
    Likes Received:
    2,542
    Location:
    Rotterdam, Netherlands
    HBA's rules and regulations are pretty clear about arousing pictures...
     
  9. Jul 26, 2013 #9

    Jeffd

    Jeffd

    Jeffd

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2011
    Messages:
    114
    Likes Received:
    102
    Location:
    Overland Park, Kansas USA
    Thanks to all for the nice words. I'll post firewall forward photos as soon as progress allows. Right now we have a mock-up small block Chevy engine fixtured in front of the firewall in prep for engine mount fab (Thanks Rob!). I came of age as a "muscle car" kid in the early '70's and have always wanted to combine that interest with the 3 dimensional arena of high performance flight - in a simple, relatively affordable package.

    Jeff
     
    raymondbird likes this.
  10. Jul 26, 2013 #10

    Jay Kempf

    Jay Kempf

    Jay Kempf

    Well-Known Member Lifetime Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2009
    Messages:
    3,672
    Likes Received:
    937
    Location:
    Warren, VT USA
    You folks are responsible for the Radial Rocket offering. Are there any parts or technology shared between the two designs?
     
  11. Jul 28, 2013 #11

    Jeffd

    Jeffd

    Jeffd

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2011
    Messages:
    114
    Likes Received:
    102
    Location:
    Overland Park, Kansas USA
    My original post fairly well summed it up. Lots of Radial Rocket tech in this new plane, and this is a good thing! This airframe is well engineered and very tough. We recently submitted a 250 page engineering report to the Swiss authorities in support of a new customer there. The swiss engineer tasked with reviewing the report was complimentary. The company test pilot and chief floor sweeper (me) insists on solid engineering.:)
     
  12. Aug 28, 2013 #12

    RJW

    RJW

    RJW

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Messages:
    695
    Likes Received:
    195
    Location:
    Wisconsin and Kansas
    This is an excellent variation on a beautiful and proven theme. It is nothing less than spectacular. My heart is certainly in it.;)


    Rob
     
  13. Aug 28, 2013 #13

    Aviator168

    Aviator168

    Aviator168

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2012
    Messages:
    2,205
    Likes Received:
    249
    Location:
    Brookville, NY. USA
    Very nice. Two place?
     
  14. Aug 29, 2013 #14

    Jeffd

    Jeffd

    Jeffd

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2011
    Messages:
    114
    Likes Received:
    102
    Location:
    Overland Park, Kansas USA

    Yes, two seats in tandem. A true two-seater with seating room for tall folks and plenty of bag storage in forward and aft bag compartments. I am about 5' 11" and sit on a 5" thick seat cushion - still leaves plenty of head room for me, even with a helmet.
     
  15. Jan 5, 2014 #15

    Jeffd

    Jeffd

    Jeffd

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2011
    Messages:
    114
    Likes Received:
    102
    Location:
    Overland Park, Kansas USA
    Here is the engine re-drive package for the P85, The drive is manufactured by Ballistic Drives. Single mesh gear drive, 1.8:1 reduction ratio.

    We plan 5000 max crank rpm to keep the max prop rpm at approx. 2775 rpm. The engine is a stroked 402 cid LS2 block with LS3 heads and intake. Lots of upgrades to the rotating package for this application. Dyno results showed that it more than exceeded our goal of 425 hp at the prop. 10:1 CR and a mild cam. Tons of torque from 3500-5000 pm.

    Weight: 414 lbs dry, as shown in the photo with alternator, water pump, starter, flywheel and headers. Re-drive is a additional 65 lbs.

    Note that the intake manifold has been swapped end for end, orienting the throttle body forward.

    Jeff Ackland
     

    Attached Files:

  16. Jan 5, 2014 #16

    Richard6

    Richard6

    Richard6

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    660
    Likes Received:
    74
    Location:
    Plymouth, MN USA
    Jeff,

    Looks great. Have a question. I don't believe that the LS2 came with a distributor sticking out the top. How did you get that to work?

    Richard
     
  17. Jan 5, 2014 #17

    Toobuilder

    Toobuilder

    Toobuilder

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2010
    Messages:
    4,447
    Likes Received:
    3,246
    Location:
    Mojave, Ca
    Indeed. What was the reasoning to go with a distributor? Seems like a step backwards in weight, complexity and cost.

    The fact that you ended up at less than 500 pounds for more than 425 HP is a very favorable power/weight. Certainly better than other typical aircraft piston power plants.

    Is this a C/S prop, or fixed?
     
  18. Jan 5, 2014 #18

    RJW

    RJW

    RJW

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Messages:
    695
    Likes Received:
    195
    Location:
    Wisconsin and Kansas
    Beautiful motor. That’s how I would’ve done it.

    I just had a coil pack from a 6-cylinder in my hands—pretty heavy. Four packs or eight coils add up. Electronic distributors never break and supply plenty of accurate spark in a low-rpm aero application. It’s what I’d use.

    Rob
     
  19. Jan 5, 2014 #19

    autoreply

    autoreply

    autoreply

    Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2009
    Messages:
    10,732
    Likes Received:
    2,542
    Location:
    Rotterdam, Netherlands
    Is there a specific reason for that reduction ratio? I'd think lower rpm=better for such high HP?
     
  20. Jan 5, 2014 #20

    Jeffd

    Jeffd

    Jeffd

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2011
    Messages:
    114
    Likes Received:
    102
    Location:
    Overland Park, Kansas USA

    The distributor mod is a readily available kit made by Wegner Automotive. Dual pickups in it to allow use of two MSD ignition systems. I think that most of the folks running the distributor also use a carb so as to eliminate use of an ECM. Personal preference in the decision to use the distributor on this one. May or may not use it on the next engine depending upon various factors - we'll see.

    Yes, very happy with the power/weight ratio, even after adding projected weight of cooling system components.

    Going fixed pitch with this one - the idea is to minimize firewall forward cost while maximizing performance for the cost. Think Spitfire I/Hurricane I with the fixed pitch props. They performed well. P85 wing loading at gross (approx 25 lbs/sq ft) and power loading (approx 5.8 lbs/hp) is very similar to these ships. Of course the Spit and Hurricane were quickly fitted with CS props - in combat a very small performance gain could mean the difference between victory and defeat. But we are not fighting a war with the P85 - just looking for that "fighter feel" with simplicity and relatively low cost in a high performance kit aircraft.

    Jeff Ackland
     
    Autodidact likes this.

Share This Page

arrow_white