Need advice on ultralight idea

Discussion in 'The light stuff area' started by GeneG, Jul 6, 2019.

Help Support HomeBuiltAirplanes Forum by donating:

  1. Jul 7, 2019 #41

    TFF

    TFF

    TFF

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2010
    Messages:
    11,644
    Likes Received:
    3,273
    Location:
    Memphis, TN
    Pretty much the reason for UL weight is if you crash out of the air, you only make a small crater in someone’s property. More weight, bigger hole. More weight means insurance and being able to defend yourself if sued.

    Doubling the area of the T2 wing needs a big think. That is a major restructuring. Although many elements can be the same, you can’t just stretch it and be ok. T2 wing has to be metal covered. If you go fabric, the whole wing guts are different, just like Rockiedog said. The Hummel UL I have seen fly is probably faster than UL limits, but it does make weight. It has to be using .016 skins but the spar is almost a foot deep to be strong enough. .016 skins look like aluminum foil.
     
  2. Jul 7, 2019 #42

    GeneG

    GeneG

    GeneG

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2019
    Messages:
    74
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Arkansas
    Most likely the spar is that deep because it's 18% rather than for the ultimate strength.
     
  3. Jul 7, 2019 #43

    pictsidhe

    pictsidhe

    pictsidhe

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2014
    Messages:
    6,869
    Likes Received:
    1,849
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Delta versus wye changes the effective number of turns. Your motor will be capabale of the same power and torque whichever way it is wound. The voltage and current can only be traded against each other. If you buy a 100V wye wound motor and want it to run from 57V, swapping the connections to delta will do that. It won't make it more powerful, nor more torquey.


     
  4. Jul 7, 2019 #44

    pictsidhe

    pictsidhe

    pictsidhe

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2014
    Messages:
    6,869
    Likes Received:
    1,849
    Location:
    North Carolina
    If you try to hire an engineer to double the wing area of the teenie while reducing weight to 254lbs he's going to do one of a few things:
    Suck through his teeth for longer than most tradesmen can manage.
    Laugh,
    Rub his hands with glee, this will COST you!
     
  5. Jul 7, 2019 #45

    GeneG

    GeneG

    GeneG

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2019
    Messages:
    74
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Arkansas
    I agree that you don't get something for nothing. Putting more copper into the stator should allow greater overall current through it enabling an increase in available power. The trade off is increased torque for motor weight vs more heating in the windings plus higher energy use. The end goal is to produce as much power for the weight as possible? Wiring for delta and running the motor at the same voltage as you would in wye configuration should certainly produce more overall power per weight no? That is why I am interested in the water cooled version of this motor. The higher applied power is for limited climb out or emergency and not continuous duty.
    If I am wrong, Please correct me.
    Thanks again.
     
  6. Jul 7, 2019 #46

    blane.c

    blane.c

    blane.c

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2015
    Messages:
    3,267
    Likes Received:
    559
    Location:
    capital district NY
  7. Jul 7, 2019 #47

    blane.c

    blane.c

    blane.c

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2015
    Messages:
    3,267
    Likes Received:
    559
    Location:
    capital district NY
  8. Jul 7, 2019 #48

    pictsidhe

    pictsidhe

    pictsidhe

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2014
    Messages:
    6,869
    Likes Received:
    1,849
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Motor manufacturers are well aware of the benefits of stuffing as much copper as they can in motors. If you open a motor up to rewind it, you'll have your work cut out matching the standard amount of copper.
    If you rewire a wye motor delta then run it at the same voltage, you have effectively reduced the number of turns and increased the kV. it will now spin 73% faster, giving 73% more power for the same resistive power loss, while sucking 73% more current. It will have the same torque. Hysteresis losses in the magnetic circuits will increase a lot due to the higher frequency. Maybe it will be fine, maybe it will come apart or cook itself. If you want to push a motor 73% past it's rated power, it's extremely unlikely to like it for very long. If your lucky, you'll just lose a lot of efficiency. Compare the weight savings of the motor to the extra batteries it will need for your flight.
    I'd recommend leaving power ratings to the manufacturer. if you order direct, you can choose the kV to suit your battery pack. The maximum torque and rpm capabilities are dependent on the physical size of the motor, not how it is wound.
    Yes, water cooled motors can be pushed a bit harder for their size, but now you need a radiator, so look at the total weight. Great for boats, though.
    Believe it or not, the guys who design these motors do tend to know what they're doing.
     
  9. Jul 7, 2019 #49

    GeneG

    GeneG

    GeneG

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2019
    Messages:
    74
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Arkansas
  10. Jul 7, 2019 #50

    GeneG

    GeneG

    GeneG

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2019
    Messages:
    74
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Arkansas
    Thanks for the lesson. I didn't really want to get into rewinding anyway.
     
  11. Jul 7, 2019 #51

    Rockiedog2

    Rockiedog2

    Rockiedog2

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2012
    Messages:
    2,285
    Likes Received:
    1,607
    Or maybe the opposite...18% so the wing will carry the load
     
  12. Jul 7, 2019 #52

    GeneG

    GeneG

    GeneG

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2019
    Messages:
    74
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Arkansas
    18% so the wing will lift 450 pounds at 28 knots not because the spar can't do more.
     
  13. Jul 7, 2019 #53

    pictsidhe

    pictsidhe

    pictsidhe

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2014
    Messages:
    6,869
    Likes Received:
    1,849
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Reduce it to 12%, the spar caps will need to be 50% heavier to have the same safety margin. It will aerodynamically lift just as much weight, but it will either be a lot heavier or more highly stressed.
     
  14. Jul 10, 2019 #54

    GeneG

    GeneG

    GeneG

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2019
    Messages:
    74
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Arkansas
    I haven't been able to locate this decision. I have only found differing views.
    Can you please direct me to the faa documentation for this?
    Thank you
     
  15. Jul 10, 2019 #55

    pictsidhe

    pictsidhe

    pictsidhe

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2014
    Messages:
    6,869
    Likes Received:
    1,849
    Location:
    North Carolina
    From the horse's mouth.
     
    mcrae0104 likes this.
  16. Jul 10, 2019 #56

    jedi

    jedi

    jedi

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2009
    Messages:
    1,780
    Likes Received:
    402
    Location:
    Sahuarita Arizona, Renton Washington, USA
    https://aviation.stackexchange.com/...count-as-fuel-in-a-battery-powered-ultralight

    Max Ultralight weight is 254 pounds including the batteries. This has put a huge damper on battery powered Ultralights but has not killed the beast. You can still get the seaplane float allowance if that would help. The additional weight and power requirements of the water operations would likely eat any advantage from the weight and the stall speed requirement still stands as a negative against the increased weight.

    You could build a big control line model and run it in a circle which is what most ULs do anyway. Might make a good amusement ride. The lines make it a kite (FAR 101) and avoids the 254 UL weight limit and stall speed but impose other limitations.
     
  17. Jul 10, 2019 #57

    GeneG

    GeneG

    GeneG

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2019
    Messages:
    74
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Arkansas

    Thanks for the link. Seems still hearsav and not written in stone.
    Then they wonder why aviation is dying.
     
  18. Jul 10, 2019 #58

    BJC

    BJC

    BJC

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2013
    Messages:
    9,561
    Likes Received:
    6,331
    Location:
    97FL, Florida, USA
    Doesn’t have to be written in stone. But you can believe that the opinion there is what the FAA will consider the law if they decide to go after a potential violator.

    Part 103 is, in essence, the FAA’a way of saying, “If you build and operate an airplane that meets this criteria, we won’t bother regulating it or you.” That is a good deal. There are lots of reasons that sport aviation is declining, but not considering batteries to be consumable fuel isn’t one.


    BJC
     
    Tiger Tim and pictsidhe like this.
  19. Jul 10, 2019 #59

    GeneG

    GeneG

    GeneG

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2019
    Messages:
    74
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Arkansas
    It still seems hearsay if not enshrined into official notice.
    Then they wonder why aviation is dying.

    Sorry, cross post.
     
  20. Jul 10, 2019 #60

    pictsidhe

    pictsidhe

    pictsidhe

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2014
    Messages:
    6,869
    Likes Received:
    1,849
    Location:
    North Carolina
    It's the FAA's interpretation of their own rules following a query, hardly hearsay.
     

Share This Page



arrow_white