Making an "obsolete" fighter into an unlimited racer !

Discussion in 'Aircraft Design / Aerodynamics / New Technology' started by Speedboat100, Feb 2, 2020.

Help Support HomeBuiltAirplanes Forum by donating:

  1. Feb 2, 2020 #1

    Speedboat100

    Speedboat100

    Speedboat100

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2018
    Messages:
    861
    Likes Received:
    86
    Location:
    Europe
    f2a-humu2.jpg

    Do you see there is any sense in this ?

    Having new wing and fuselage retought etc ?

    Tripling the horsepower....and other refinements.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Feb 2, 2020 #2

    TerryM76

    TerryM76

    TerryM76

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2012
    Messages:
    539
    Likes Received:
    200
    Location:
    Tempe, AZ
    A Brewester Buffalo!!!??????
     
  3. Feb 2, 2020 #3

    Speedboat100

    Speedboat100

    Speedboat100

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2018
    Messages:
    861
    Likes Received:
    86
    Location:
    Europe

    Yes we finns even made a copy of it called HUMU ( hype )...after we started run out of originals.

    I'm trying to make a R-2800 version of it.

    F2A.HMX77.jpg
     
    Last edited: Feb 3, 2020
  4. Feb 2, 2020 #4

    Kyle Boatright

    Kyle Boatright

    Kyle Boatright

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2012
    Messages:
    867
    Likes Received:
    497
    Location:
    Marietta, GA
    The R-2800 version is called a Bearcat. ;-)
     
    Voidhawk9 and BJC like this.
  5. Feb 2, 2020 #5

    Speedboat100

    Speedboat100

    Speedboat100

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2018
    Messages:
    861
    Likes Received:
    86
    Location:
    Europe

    You could say that.

    I try to make the wing into F8F direction....perhaps with slightly thinner foil.

    I may end up having just R/C model of it.

    1024px-Grumman_F8F-2_Bearcat_BuAer_drawings_1949.png
     
  6. Feb 2, 2020 #6

    Speedboat100

    Speedboat100

    Speedboat100

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2018
    Messages:
    861
    Likes Received:
    86
    Location:
    Europe
    I find Brewster F2A sorta complicated.

    But I think it has potential.

    Brewster-F2A-Buffalo-Cutaway.jpg
     
  7. Feb 2, 2020 #7

    Speedboat100

    Speedboat100

    Speedboat100

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2018
    Messages:
    861
    Likes Received:
    86
    Location:
    Europe
  8. Feb 2, 2020 #8

    Speedboat100

    Speedboat100

    Speedboat100

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2018
    Messages:
    861
    Likes Received:
    86
    Location:
    Europe
  9. Feb 2, 2020 #9

    lr27

    lr27

    lr27

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2007
    Messages:
    3,581
    Likes Received:
    542
    Later versions of the Buffalo were heavier too.
     
  10. Feb 3, 2020 #10

    Victor Bravo

    Victor Bravo

    Victor Bravo

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2014
    Messages:
    6,599
    Likes Received:
    5,380
    Location:
    KWHP, Los Angeles CA, USA
    The days of upgrading and hot-rodding old warbirds are dead and gone. To have a competitive racer today requires a clean sheeet.
     
  11. Feb 3, 2020 #11

    Voidhawk9

    Voidhawk9

    Voidhawk9

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2012
    Messages:
    287
    Likes Received:
    169
    Location:
    Timaru, NZ
    Forget Unlimited. Too limited, ironically.
    Sport class hasn't even come close to exploiting the full potential of the rules.
     
    Tantrum1 likes this.
  12. Feb 3, 2020 #12

    TFF

    TFF

    TFF

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2010
    Messages:
    12,063
    Likes Received:
    3,478
    Location:
    Memphis, TN
    You are showing off more money than you let on if you can build a Buffalo with a 2800 from scratch.
     
  13. Feb 3, 2020 #13

    lr27

    lr27

    lr27

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2007
    Messages:
    3,581
    Likes Received:
    542
    My guess is that in a few years, the sport class will be just as fast as unlimited.
     
  14. Feb 3, 2020 #14

    Speedboat100

    Speedboat100

    Speedboat100

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2018
    Messages:
    861
    Likes Received:
    86
    Location:
    Europe

    The R-2800 was invented introduced 1938.

    I bet the designs to utilize it for speed were tested 1940-1945.
     
    Last edited: Feb 3, 2020
  15. Feb 3, 2020 #15

    Speedboat100

    Speedboat100

    Speedboat100

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2018
    Messages:
    861
    Likes Received:
    86
    Location:
    Europe

    Maybe I am a gambler too.


    ....or I make vocational schools make it for free.
     
    Last edited: Feb 3, 2020
  16. Feb 3, 2020 #16

    Voidhawk9

    Voidhawk9

    Voidhawk9

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2012
    Messages:
    287
    Likes Received:
    169
    Location:
    Timaru, NZ
    The fastest sport class racers were faster than many of the unlimited this last year (2019).
     
    Last edited: Feb 3, 2020
  17. Feb 3, 2020 #17

    Speedboat100

    Speedboat100

    Speedboat100

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2018
    Messages:
    861
    Likes Received:
    86
    Location:
    Europe
    How many of you has extra R-2800s lying around in your hangers ?
     
  18. Feb 3, 2020 #18

    Speedboat100

    Speedboat100

    Speedboat100

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2018
    Messages:
    861
    Likes Received:
    86
    Location:
    Europe

    But cars can be made to look racy too.

    model-t.jpg
     
  19. Feb 3, 2020 #19

    Victor Bravo

    Victor Bravo

    Victor Bravo

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2014
    Messages:
    6,599
    Likes Received:
    5,380
    Location:
    KWHP, Los Angeles CA, USA
    That is irrelevant. The R-2800 engine is still a perfectly good choice for an unlimited racer today, just as it was after WW2.

    The problem with your idea is that the Brewster Buffalo is by far not the correct design for a racer. It was not a particularly fast aircraft at any time since it was first flown, and this has not changed in the last 80 years. Considering how few Buffalo's were built, and how few survive today, it would be a poor decision on every level, from historic preservation to racing competition.

    The R-2800, mounted on another aircraft that is farl ess historically significant or rare (The Yak-11 trainer) has created a very usuable and competitive unlimited racer.

    Making a purpose built racing airframe, using modern materials and engineering, and modern aerodynamic analysis methods, could easily yield a 500 MPH racer.
     
    Battler Britton and Speedboat100 like this.
  20. Feb 4, 2020 #20

    rhbelter

    rhbelter

    rhbelter

    Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Carmel CA
    2020-Feb 4th


    Ahoy, HomeBuiltAirplanes,


    Dark-of-the-night thoughts ::::


    Reno Racers: Very high level development, but innovation ????


    Sheeessh !!! And youse-guys want to build just another almost-the-same ‘critter’ as everyone else is flying ???? !!!!


    It comes to my mind that the only significant innovative ‘things’ which I have seen there are vapor phase cooling, and (years ago), the clean-sheet Pond Racer.


    At Reno, I was talking with an Aerothermodynamicist, (my thesis field) whose name, I no longer recall, but his was on more than half of the landing gear doors present.


    My question was about vapor phase cooling endurance, and he noted that at low power, it was pretty good, with the P51 – so rigged -- having flown from Portland to Van Nuys.


    The Pond Racer sounded like an immense window fan. He remarked that they were going to need to automate a lot more things, because the pilot workload with cooling doors and spray nozzles and all else was overwhelming. Unfortunately, no longer needed.


    Sports Racers:



    The Reno Go-Fast Sports Racer Rules: … ‘Aircraft are to be powered by an internal combustion engine or engines totaling no more than 1000 cu in.’

    I’ve neither seen, nor heard any talk about a pair of 495 cu/in seriously hot engines installed in an appropriate --- say a tandem engine / tilt-wing / extension shaft airplane.

    Of course, the extension shaft is no casual thing. A comprehensive dynamic analysis is in order, along with appropriately measured results. The development of such may well be made easier by using a clutch to de-couple the shaft during start, and up to some certain rpm.

    BTW, a seriously dangerous soul is one with a shop full of high tech tools who can craft a PSRU, but is ‘unlettered’ in his ability to technically analyze the dynamics of his ‘creation’, nor is he capable of measuring the result.

    Tandem engines were figured out by Bugatti 80 years ago. Too bad that the beautiful replica airplane did not have a proper dynamic shaft analysis / measurement. What I read about the loss was ‘clutch failure’. I’ll bet that a lot of unplanned for torsional dynamics were very involved with that clutch failure.

    The wetted surface of such an airplane could be about the same as a single engine critter, and with twice the HP, I suggest that a well-done airplane like that would absolutely rule the Sport Racers, and scare the crap out of the unlimited guys.

    WHY is such an airplane not seen??? I cannot be the only guy to have had such ideas.

    I believe that there is plenty of $$$ in the hands of the Reno Racers to do such. ??????

    Enjoy /s/ Bob
     

Share This Page

Group Builder
arrow_white