Lilium - Point to point small air transport reinvigorated?

Homebuilt Aircraft & Kit Plane Forum

Help Support Homebuilt Aircraft & Kit Plane Forum:

henryk

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2010
Messages
6,196
Location
krakow,poland
Last edited by a moderator:

anvegger

Well-Known Member
HBA Supporter
Joined
Jul 6, 2015
Messages
535
Location
LACONIA NH USA
The domain name was purchased back in August 2017 for $4,100 and the site was registered privately right after that. I agree that most of the videos and photos look like montage sometimes with crucial mismatches like that : Where is the trike's wheels? No address no references to the manufacturing or design objectives. very strange organization came from nowhere
 

bmcj

Well-Known Member
HBA Supporter
Joined
Apr 10, 2007
Messages
13,873
Location
Fresno, California
And Boeing announced a $2 million prize yesterday. For personal flight device or something.
what kind of in ovation are they hoping for? The way I see it, hovering dynamics is a known science, batteries and electric motors are what they are, and GPS navigation and automation is pretty standard. Everyone is working from the same bag of tricks. The only real variable is collision avoidance.

Innovation is. Or going to come from designing an air taxi... everyone will have similarly comparable vehicles. True innovation will come from advances in batteries and motors (mostly batteries). In other words, component advances. Battery/motor research is where that 2 million dollars should be targeted.
 

BBerson

Light Plane Philosopher
HBA Supporter
Joined
Dec 16, 2007
Messages
15,236
Location
Port Townsend WA
I just scanned the proposal quickly, so can't comment. The issue I think is safety standards. No standards exist for personal VTOL fail safe backup as far as I know.
The regulators will require something.
 

Topaz

Super Moderator
Staff member
Log Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2005
Messages
14,751
Location
Orange County, California
... The issue I think is safety standards. No standards exist for personal VTOL fail safe backup as far as I know.
The regulators will require something.
Which is going to be the death of the whole thing. We don't have "fail safe" backups on any kind of flying machine now. What's the "fail safe backup" on a Boeing 777, for heaven's sake? I agree that the regulators are going to demand this sort of nonsense, because that's the sort of bureaucracy-heavy world we live in today, but it's just more weight and complexity layered onto a class of vehicles that are already heavy and complicated. The only "reasonable" safety technology is redundancy in the lift system. Anything else - including BRS for this purpose - has a "dead zone" near the ground where a failure will produce a serious crash. Redundancy in the lift system means a lot of extra weight and a big extra drain on the batteries; and batteries are already the weak point in these machines.

I agree with BMCJ - Boeing's money is far better spent on battery technology than re-inventing the powered-lift vehicle. Between the work done in the 1950's and the modern work done with "drones" and their automated flight controls, the airframe and lift-system part have already matured. We're just waiting on "good enough" energy storage. Of course, $2 Million is chump change in aerospace development today, which means this "initiative" from Boeing is more of a PR move than a serious exercise in developing "personal" VTOL technology.
 

bmcj

Well-Known Member
HBA Supporter
Joined
Apr 10, 2007
Messages
13,873
Location
Fresno, California
what kind of in ovation are they hoping for? The way I see it, hovering dynamics is a known science, batteries and electric motors are what they are, and GPS navigation and automation is pretty standard. Everyone is working from the same bag of tricks. The only real variable is collision avoidance.

Innovation is. Or going to come from designing an air taxi... everyone will have similarly comparable vehicles. True innovation will come from advances in batteries and motors (mostly batteries). In other words, component advances. Battery/motor research is where that 2 million dollars should be targeted.
Oops! Forgive the small-screen typing errors, but I think you can figure out what I meant despite the autocorrect errors.
 

BBerson

Light Plane Philosopher
HBA Supporter
Joined
Dec 16, 2007
Messages
15,236
Location
Port Townsend WA
Yeah, took me a while to figure what "ovation" they were going for...:)

Almost no one has seriously trusted their life to this yet. So numerous methods of getting killed have yet to be explored.
And almost certainly they will have autonomous collision avoidance. The standard for that hasn't been accepted yet either.

And the standard for electric aircraft doesn't exist yet. EA-B is open, but can't run an air taxi on EA-B.
 

anvegger

Well-Known Member
HBA Supporter
Joined
Jul 6, 2015
Messages
535
Location
LACONIA NH USA
A bit of an update information from yesterday's AVWEB.COM:

A two-seat autonomous aircraft with 16 electric rotors flew for the first time in May, and carried passengers on board for several flights in early September, the company recently announced. The “PassengerDrone” aircraft, built in Switzerland, looks similar to a Volocopter, but with its rotors placed along two straight booms instead of Volocopter’s circular rotor array.
p1brhqi0821ejqmkhbi71jl4d0j6.jpg
 

anvegger

Well-Known Member
HBA Supporter
Joined
Jul 6, 2015
Messages
535
Location
LACONIA NH USA
And today we have some news from Dubai - A cross between a drone and a motorcycle, the Hoversurf can seat a police officer or be controlled remotely Dubai Police are taking crime-fighting into the future as they unveiled their latest innovations on the first day of Gitex Technology Week on Sunday. The Hoversurf, a cross between a drone and motorcycle, can seat a police officer or be controlled remotely. Four large propellers flank its corners allowing it to fly at a height of 5 metres if mounted and 6km without a rider.It can fly for up to 25 minutes when battery charged and almost an hour when traditionally fuelled. The Hoversurf "bike" can also carry an additional 300kg and flies at a speed of 70kmh.

na09-gitex-4.jpg
 

tspear

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
987
Location
Outside Boston
And today we have some news from Dubai - A cross between a drone and a motorcycle, the Hoversurf can seat a police officer or be controlled remotely Dubai Police are taking crime-fighting into the future as they unveiled their latest innovations on the first day of Gitex Technology Week on Sunday. The Hoversurf, a cross between a drone and motorcycle, can seat a police officer or be controlled remotely. Four large propellers flank its corners allowing it to fly at a height of 5 metres if mounted and 6km without a rider.It can fly for up to 25 minutes when battery charged and almost an hour when traditionally fuelled. The Hoversurf "bike" can also carry an additional 300kg and flies at a speed of 70kmh.

View attachment 66360
That looks like it will take out someones likes, likely the pilot flying the thing.

Tim
 

Tiger Tim

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2013
Messages
3,929
Location
Thunder Bay
That looks like it will take out someones likes, likely the pilot flying the thing.

Tim
It looks like a movie prop. I would think it needs more motors for redundancy, I believe the magic number is six as a minimum though you could keep the same configuration as in the pic if you went with eight, just arrange them to push/pull at each corner.
 

anvegger

Well-Known Member
HBA Supporter
Joined
Jul 6, 2015
Messages
535
Location
LACONIA NH USA
Last edited:
Top