Is steam or air really viable?

Discussion in 'Aircraft Design / Aerodynamics / New Technology' started by Aerowerx, Jul 17, 2019.

Help Support HomeBuiltAirplanes Forum by donating:

  1. Jul 20, 2019 #41

    Sockmonkey

    Sockmonkey

    Sockmonkey

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2014
    Messages:
    1,650
    Likes Received:
    430
    Location:
    Flint, Mi, USA
    This talk activated the inventy bits of my brain.
    Consider a simple propulsion unit for a boat.
    One moving part. Runs on any fuel.
    Water in, heat to steam, blow out the back for thrust.
    Essentially a jet engine using water.
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Jul 21, 2019
  2. Jul 21, 2019 #42

    poormansairforce

    poormansairforce

    poormansairforce

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2017
    Messages:
    572
    Likes Received:
    122
    Location:
    Just an Ohioan
    And would be completely worthless for motive force!

    Since we have invested so much energy creating a compressed gas out of a liquid we may as well increase the heat energy of that gas so we can get as much work as possible from it before we have to do it all over again. This increases the efficiency of the system. So it can be seen that the term superheat virtually always means high temps.

    Unsuitable oils as well as incorrect delivery and dosage will lead problems such as carbon deposits, etc much quicker than saturated systems which have the issue of washing out the oil.

    I remember reading a modeling thread of a man that built a superheated system for his tethered hydroplane and he said the pipe coming out of the boiler to the engine glowed dull red so he had to disassemble the engine every couple of runs to clean and oil it. Now thats some serious heat!
     
    Last edited: Jul 21, 2019
  3. Jul 21, 2019 #43

    Doggzilla

    Doggzilla

    Doggzilla

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2013
    Messages:
    1,765
    Likes Received:
    351
    Location:
    Everywhere USA
    Steam can be done. There are new supercritical steam turbines that vastly reduce turbine size.

    Basically it’s steam at high pressure that behaves like a liquid. Instead of expanding it out to low pressure with multiple blades the waste steam is returned to be reused like a heat exchanger.

    Let’s say the steam is 700psi. The steam is about times as dense as a 50:1 modern jet turbine. Very thick. The thick high pressure steam is expanded until it hits maybe 500psi, then slightly cooled. At this high pressure the steam condensed to liquid at around 500 degrees as well.

    That liquid can then be pumped back into the high pressure boiler using about 1/15th the energy output, where the temp is increased again. So there is next to no loss and the only energy required is raising the temp back up between cycles.

    This basically just shrinks the size down where you can use a single stage turbine like a liquid.

    And those are just examples of pressures, in reality they are far higher. But you get the theory.
     
    Sockmonkey likes this.
  4. Jul 21, 2019 #44

    BJC

    BJC

    BJC

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2013
    Messages:
    9,323
    Likes Received:
    6,096
    Location:
    97FL, Florida, USA
    I would appreciate a reference; the supercritical steam cycle equipment that I operated, tested and maintained have been decommissioned, so they definitely can not be considered as new.

    Thanks,


    BJC
     
  5. Jul 21, 2019 #45

    proppastie

    proppastie

    proppastie

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2012
    Messages:
    3,659
    Likes Received:
    1,059
    Location:
    NJ
    Now I am confused (easily done) I thought you said Saturated until 705 F then superheated.....
     
  6. Jul 21, 2019 #46

    BJC

    BJC

    BJC

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2013
    Messages:
    9,323
    Likes Received:
    6,096
    Location:
    97FL, Florida, USA
    Note that I said that saturated steam is possible up to 705 F. It takes knowing the pressure and temperature to determine the steam condition.

    Recall that at standard conditions, H2O is liquid water. Add energy (heat) to it, and it’s temperature rises. At the boiling point, 212 F, it starts to change state from water to steam. When some of the molecules have become energetic enough to be steam, but not all molecules have, the fluid is a mixture of water and steam. Increasing the heat input rate increases the speed of changing the water to steam, but does not increase the temperature. When all of the molecules have become energetic enough to be steam, the fluid is called saturated steam. Additional heat will raise the energy level and the temperature. Steam that is hotter than the saturation temperature is called superheated steam.


    BJC
     
    proppastie likes this.
  7. Jul 21, 2019 #47

    pictsidhe

    pictsidhe

    pictsidhe

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2014
    Messages:
    6,429
    Likes Received:
    1,670
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Only heavy if you build them like steam locomotives.

    I did the numbers some years back. The trick to a lightweight boiler is to minimise wall thickness. The pressure that a tube of gien wall can take is inversely proportional to it's diameter. So for a lightweight boiler, use small diameter tubing in a flash boiler. You'll find that if you use 3/16 cupronickel brake line, you can build a surprisingly light boiler. Cupronickel is used in industrial boilers, it just so happens that we can buy cheap coils of it. Throw much more money into smaller or higher strength tubing, you can go even lighter. I was looking at something I could afford...
     
  8. Jul 21, 2019 #48

    proppastie

    proppastie

    proppastie

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2012
    Messages:
    3,659
    Likes Received:
    1,059
    Location:
    NJ
    So do you think a flash tube boiler 100% loss engine would be lighter than an eternal heat generated super heated water tank (read plug in the tank heater on the ground until up to temperature/pressure)
     
  9. Jul 21, 2019 #49

    Doggzilla

    Doggzilla

    Doggzilla

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2013
    Messages:
    1,765
    Likes Received:
    351
    Location:
    Everywhere USA
    Oh this explains a lot, you have not been reading past the first few lines before jumping to conclusions.

    If you had, you would have seen the part about the difference being in the condenser and not the pressure. Not having a vacuum condenser and instead returning steam while it’s still at extreme temperatures to keep fluid density high.

    Literally the exact opposite of existing supercritical steam systems.
     
  10. Jul 21, 2019 #50

    Doggzilla

    Doggzilla

    Doggzilla

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2013
    Messages:
    1,765
    Likes Received:
    351
    Location:
    Everywhere USA
    Even those aren’t too bad. Most of the weight is the heat exchanger pipes, as they did not have efficient heat exchangers like today. The boiler on a 6000hp locomotive is about the size of a man.
     
  11. Jul 21, 2019 #51

    mcrae0104

    mcrae0104

    mcrae0104

    Armchair Mafia Conspirator HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2009
    Messages:
    2,938
    Likes Received:
    1,941
    Location:
    BDU, BJC
    Pass the popcorn please. But only if it's popped with supercritical steam.
     
  12. Jul 21, 2019 #52

    BJC

    BJC

    BJC

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2013
    Messages:
    9,323
    Likes Received:
    6,096
    Location:
    97FL, Florida, USA
    No jumping to conclusions, just asking for reference. You wrote
    Since I have experience with the first generation of utility scale supercritical cycles, I would like to get current on the “new supercritical steam turbines that vastly reduce turbine size.” Why not provide an answer rather than a glib comment?


    BJC
     
  13. Jul 21, 2019 #53

    pictsidhe

    pictsidhe

    pictsidhe

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2014
    Messages:
    6,429
    Likes Received:
    1,670
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Yes. You want to minimise the volume of high pressure whatever. The flash boiler system would be a lot more complciated than a big old tank, though.
     
  14. Jul 21, 2019 #54

    pictsidhe

    pictsidhe

    pictsidhe

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2014
    Messages:
    6,429
    Likes Received:
    1,670
    Location:
    North Carolina
    I have an old copy of a huge Babcock and Wicox steam book. It's my best steam turbine reference.
    The fact that it is written for nuclear power plant engineers does not influence the physics involved.
     
    RonL likes this.
  15. Jul 21, 2019 #55

    FritzW

    FritzW

    FritzW

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    3,441
    Likes Received:
    3,050
    Location:
    Las Cruces, NM
    What about chemically generated pressure?

    I've played with running Air Hog(ish) compressed air toys on dry ice or Alka-Seltzer ...it kinda works. And that was before we knew about Mintos and diet Coke.

    There's bound to be something that would generate enough gas pressure/flow at room temperature.
     
  16. Jul 21, 2019 #56

    pictsidhe

    pictsidhe

    pictsidhe

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2014
    Messages:
    6,429
    Likes Received:
    1,670
    Location:
    North Carolina
    You're out of luck there. When the kernels pop, the released steam will be saturated.
     
  17. Jul 21, 2019 #57

    pictsidhe

    pictsidhe

    pictsidhe

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2014
    Messages:
    6,429
    Likes Received:
    1,670
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Google 'rocket propellants'
     
  18. Jul 21, 2019 #58

    BJC

    BJC

    BJC

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2013
    Messages:
    9,323
    Likes Received:
    6,096
    Location:
    97FL, Florida, USA
    I like the B&W Steam much better than Combustion Engineering but I have used both extensively.


    BJC
     
    Pops likes this.
  19. Jul 21, 2019 #59

    poormansairforce

    poormansairforce

    poormansairforce

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2017
    Messages:
    572
    Likes Received:
    122
    Location:
    Just an Ohioan
    The steam engineers of old would have given anything to get away from steam and just fill the gas tank and go flying....you know....the way we can.:D
     
  20. Jul 21, 2019 #60

    proppastie

    proppastie

    proppastie

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2012
    Messages:
    3,659
    Likes Received:
    1,059
    Location:
    NJ
    propane cylinder under the brake line flash tube?
     

Share This Page

arrow_white