• Welcome aboard HomebuiltAirplanes.com, your destination for connecting with a thriving community of more than 10,000 active members, all passionate about home-built aviation. Dive into our comprehensive repository of knowledge, exchange technical insights, arrange get-togethers, and trade aircrafts/parts with like-minded enthusiasts. Unearth a wide-ranging collection of general and kit plane aviation subjects, enriched with engaging imagery, in-depth technical manuals, and rare archives.

    For a nominal fee of $99.99/year or $12.99/month, you can immerse yourself in this dynamic community and unparalleled treasure-trove of aviation knowledge.

    Embark on your journey now!

    Click Here to Become a Premium Member and Experience Homebuilt Airplanes to the Fullest!

Is part 103 based on outdated FAA pilot weight?

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

FritzW

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2011
Messages
3,896
Location
Las Cruces, NM
I didn't want to start digging another rabbit hole on the "Part 103 Viability" thread...

I don't think it's a coincidence that the empty weight of an ultralight is *exactly 1.5 times the FAA "Standard Pilot" weight.

If that's true, and I believe it is, as 'hobby level' designers, we have to design safe airplanes for a 5'6" 170lbs, depression era pilot. ...but that airplane has to safely fly a 2018 1st. world adult. (I don't buy the crap about Americans being more over weight than any other 1st. world country. ...that's just "currently stylish" anti-American B.S.).

Just thinking... If the rule was "1.5 X pilot weight" it would open up a whole new world of airplane design. I understand that more than one pilot could/will fly the airplane, and I don't know how the FAA would deal with that (if I understood all that I'd be on SolidWorks instead of the HBA :gig:).

...just thinking



*Yes, I have a calculator also, I'm a pound off ;). ...I suspect: back in 1983 when the FAA was deciding what to do with powered hang gliders... some FAA engineer in the "Part 103 committee" probably said: "if you limit the empty weight to about 1.5 X the pilots weight (255 lbs) they should be okay". The bureaucrats played the 'telephone game' with the words "limit" and "less than" ...and, shazam, we have Part 103.
 
Back
Top