I do have a little “secret sauce” but I find it very difficult to sell or even give away.
It may be that this builder or buyer used his “secret sauce” but wants to keep the secret private.
"I have a set of scales right here we can use!"
You can become a Supporting Member which comes with a decal or just click here to donate.
I do have a little “secret sauce” but I find it very difficult to sell or even give away.
It may be that this builder or buyer used his “secret sauce” but wants to keep the secret private.
I do have a little “secret sauce” but I find it very difficult to sell or even give away.
It may be that this builder or buyer used his “secret sauce” but wants to keep the secret private.
I wonder whatever happened to the goomer that flew his “fat” UL autogyro to Wash DC, landed it on the mall, and tried to deliver letters to all the members of Congress for some cause. He didn’t get too far, but the big question was, ”what would they charge him with?”I've really never seen an effective U/L that actually made weight. Most all are flying "fat". If one is flying an accepted 103 design and it is built and flown accordingly, it has been my experience that the authorities can have some (limited) understanding. Last I checked the fine for overweight and/or improper operation is $1000 no appeal ! I know of only one case where this was levied, and in my opinion the guy deserved it.
I saw a recent video by Dennis Brooks yesterday, (he's built a few Ultra Cruisers, and an H5) where he was weighing his latest UC build. Wings off, with oil in it he was getting 201. His commentary was he needed to deduct the oil weight, and he'd weighed the wings at 45 pounds, so he came out around 243? Anyway, he'd changed to light wheels, had done something with the landing gear, and was very careful on the build. He was speculating that he might be able to put a canopy on it, which is usually not possible to make weight. I've had several UC builders tell me it's very possible to make weight, you just have to build light, and not put any frills on it. Check out his you tube channel to see the series on this build.I've really never seen an effective U/L that actually made weight. Most all are flying "fat". If one is flying an accepted 103 design and it is built and flown accordingly, it has been my experience that the authorities can have some (limited) understanding. Last I checked the fine for overweight and/or improper operation is $1000 no appeal ! I know of only one case where this was levied, and in my opinion the guy deserved it.
The FAA cited him for flying an unregistered aircraft, it weighed more than 254# and had a fuel capacity of 10 gallons. Also threw in some airspace violations but he had no airman certificates. Ultimately he paid a $100 fine and did 120 days in jail for other charges, the gov. did not want a public trial so they let him off with a slap on the wrist and I think the FAA citations were dropped. Doug Hughes was the man of the hour.I wonder whatever happened to the goomer that flew his “fat” UL autogyro to Wash DC, landed it on the mall, and tried to deliver letters to all the members of Congress for some cause. He didn’t get too far, but the big question was, ”what would they charge him with?”
I've been watching Dennis's videos since the get go. A master builder ! I think we all miss Spike a lot. I've seen the video you mentioned and watched the build videos on that U/C. The kit that I recieved is built to maximum lightness, any compromise in its structure would compromise safety. We all live and operate in different areas of the country and must build accordingly. 2 ply wheelbarrow tires & wheels would be a disaster around here. The Hummel plans make it clear that a canopy will put you overweight, the landing gear as well, has only one U/L option the others on the plan will put you over as well. Is lubricating oil an engine part ? A U/C built to 254 # is indeed possible But in doing so one must accept real limitations in its operation.I saw a recent video by Dennis Brooks yesterday, (he's built a few Ultra Cruisers, and an H5) where he was weighing his latest UC build. Wings off, with oil in it he was getting 201. His commentary was he needed to deduct the oil weight, and he'd weighed the wings at 45 pounds, so he came out around 243? Anyway, he'd changed to light wheels, had done something with the landing gear, and was very careful on the build. He was speculating that he might be able to put a canopy on it, which is usually not possible to make weight. I've had several UC builders tell me it's very possible to make weight, you just have to build light, and not put any frills on it. Check out his you tube channel to see the series on this build.
I think Terry told Dennis that the empty weight is dry weight, so no oil in the sump. Not sure if that's accurate or not. How's your build going?I've been watching Dennis's videos since the get go. A master builder ! I think we all miss Spike a lot. I've seen the video you mentioned and watched the build videos on that U/C. The kit that I recieved is built to maximum lightness, any compromise in its structure would compromise safety. We all live and operate in different areas of the country and must build accordingly. 2 ply wheelbarrow tires & wheels would be a disaster around here. The Hummel plans make it clear that a canopy will put you overweight, the landing gear as well, has only one U/L option the others on the plan will put you over as well. Is lubricating oil an engine part ? A U/C built to 254 # is indeed possible But in doing so one must accept real limitations in its operation.
That's clever using the chute allowance like that. Is the Honcho all metal?My Honcho ultralight weighed 255 pounds with 440 including starter, battery, welded aluminum gas tank, altimeter, airspeed, CHT, disc brakes.
Sometimes I carried a throw chute only to be legal. I believe the wings weighed 32 pounds and one of the best in the industry.
You can do that. Some include oil weight in the EW for convenience, but we’re still taught to calculate engine oil weight in Private Pilot groundschool.I think Terry told Dennis that the empty weight is dry weight, so no oil in the sump. Not sure if that's accurate or not. How's your build going?
The correct answer is "undrainable oil"I think Terry told Dennis that the empty weight is dry weight, so no oil in the sump. Not sure if that's accurate or not.
My Honcho ultralight weighed 255 pounds with 440 including starter, battery, welded aluminum gas tank, altimeter, airspeed, CHT, disc brakes.
Sometimes I carried a throw chute only to be legal. I believe the wings weighed 32 pounds and one of the best in the industry.
Curious how part 23 stuff gets applied to "ultralight vehicles". If it's not an airplane, which rules do or don't apply?The correct answer is "undrainable oil"
Technically, it should be filled to capacity then drained, the residual oil that does not drain out is part of the empty weight.
When Part 23 airplanes showed up, 23.29 required full operating fluids to be part of the empty weight (except fuel).
Auxiliary fluids like water or methanol for enhanced engine performance, potable water, or lavatory precharge are not included in empty weight.
I think Terry told Dennis that the empty weight is dry weight, so no oil in the sump. Not sure if that's accurate or not. How's your build going?
Curious how part 23 stuff gets applied to "ultralight vehicles". If it's not an airplane, which rules do or don't apply?
The build is steady as she goes. Stuffing the 503 into the Hummel motor box from the bottom up has proven to be interesting but it looks like it will work out OK. Fun with Cleco's !I think Terry told Dennis that the empty weight is dry weight, so no oil in the sump. Not sure if that's accurate or not. How's your build going?
Enter your email address to join:
Register today and take advantage of membership benefits.
Enter your email address to join: