HP-18J Self-Launch Sailplane Project

Discussion in 'Completions' started by Cozyflier, Sep 16, 2015.

Help Support HomeBuiltAirplanes Forum by donating:

  1. Sep 16, 2015 #1

    Cozyflier

    Cozyflier

    Cozyflier

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2010
    Messages:
    45
    Likes Received:
    48
    Location:
    Waukesha, WI.
    After a number of years, the HP-18J sailplane project has been completed. I am currently in the flight testing stage as a true glider utilizing a tow plane to become airborne. Upon completion of the flight testing (10 hours), the turbine testing stage will follow. The sailplane project is a Schreder HP-18 with a number of additions to optimize the performance and use the self-launching turbine engines. The changes are numerous (airfoil modification, center control stick addition, one piece forward hinged canopy, new geometry turtleback and nose, installation of wing fuel cells, a fuselage fuel tank and twin Jet Cat P300 turbines for self-launch and sustainer operations. Attached are a couple of photos of the completed project and its first flight.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Sep 16, 2015 #2

    Victor Bravo

    Victor Bravo

    Victor Bravo

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2014
    Messages:
    6,083
    Likes Received:
    4,862
    Location:
    KWHP, Los Angeles CA, USA
    Wow! WOW! Congratulations!

    Did you do all the Udo Rumpf mods, or did you come up with another airfoil entirely?

    Did you build a flare-launcher tube to light some brush fires, to make some thermals... out there in WI :)

    (just a smart-ass comment from a Mojave Desert sailplane guy... sorry)
     
    autoreply likes this.
  3. Sep 17, 2015 #3

    don january

    don january

    don january

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2015
    Messages:
    2,641
    Likes Received:
    1,067
    Location:
    Midwest
    very nice job
     
  4. Sep 17, 2015 #4

    DanielV

    DanielV

    DanielV

    Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2015
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Haute-Savoie, France
    Excellent. Very cool project and well done
     
  5. Sep 17, 2015 #5

    BJC

    BJC

    BJC

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2013
    Messages:
    9,550
    Likes Received:
    6,322
    Location:
    97FL, Florida, USA
    Contgratulations. I really like the HP series, with the -18 as my favorite.

    IIRC, I saw Dick walk up the wing on his at Rockford or Oshkosh.

    Eagerly awaiting your powered launch reports.


    BJC
     
  6. Sep 17, 2015 #6

    gtae07

    gtae07

    gtae07

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2012
    Messages:
    1,811
    Likes Received:
    1,079
    Location:
    Georgia
    Nice!

    How much trouble and hassle has the FAA given you for having a jet-powered airplane?
     
  7. Sep 17, 2015 #7

    autoreply

    autoreply

    autoreply

    Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2009
    Messages:
    10,732
    Likes Received:
    2,542
    Location:
    Rotterdam, Netherlands
    Awesome, congrats!
     
  8. Sep 17, 2015 #8

    RPM314

    RPM314

    RPM314

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2015
    Messages:
    724
    Likes Received:
    301
    Location:
    NY, USA
    Looks sexy as the dickens. Eagerly awaiting flight reports.
     
  9. Sep 17, 2015 #9

    blane.c

    blane.c

    blane.c

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2015
    Messages:
    3,266
    Likes Received:
    559
    Location:
    capital district NY
    wow! very nice.
     
  10. Sep 21, 2015 #10

    Cozyflier

    Cozyflier

    Cozyflier

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2010
    Messages:
    45
    Likes Received:
    48
    Location:
    Waukesha, WI.
    Most of the changes were Udo Rumpf's with his airfoil modification.
     
  11. Sep 21, 2015 #11

    Cozyflier

    Cozyflier

    Cozyflier

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2010
    Messages:
    45
    Likes Received:
    48
    Location:
    Waukesha, WI.
    None to really speak of. Being an experimental may have helped, but the key is that it is an aircraft and not an airplane. The turbines are not being used as the primary source of propulsion.
     
  12. Sep 22, 2015 #12

    gtae07

    gtae07

    gtae07

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2012
    Messages:
    1,811
    Likes Received:
    1,079
    Location:
    Georgia
    So they aren't requiring an LOA and yearly approved maintenance program and all that crap? That's good to know. Everything I've read on the subject says the FAA has stupid requirements for anything with a jet engine, no matter what size it is or what performance it has.
     
  13. May 2, 2016 #13

    Cozyflier

    Cozyflier

    Cozyflier

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2010
    Messages:
    45
    Likes Received:
    48
    Location:
    Waukesha, WI.
    The testing of the twin turbines is now complete, below are a couple of notes regarding my last flight test:

    The weather and wind was favorable for the one remaining flight test last Friday. After assembly and one turbine test run the HP-18J was pulled out to the runway for the last remaining flight test - the self-launch exercise.

    Wind speed and direction was 5 to 10 mph almost right down the runway. I strapped in and powered up the aircraft, extended the turbines and proceeded with the start sequence. Once both turbines were started and stabilized at idle (33,000 RPM) the thumbs up was conveyed to the wing runner. Full power was applied (105,000 RPM) and the takeoff roll was started.

    Once the aircraft speed exceeded the wing runners pace the left wing dropped and the roller blade wheel at the end of the wing did its job. Within a short time the ailerons took effect and I was once again level and accelerating towards takeoff speed. The airspeed was climbing rapidly and the tail was next to lift followed shortly by the sailplane takeoff. I stayed in ground effect for a couple of seconds then started my climb.

    By the time I crossed the end of the runway I had gained 400'. I continued the climb at 60 to 70 KTS until reaching my goal altitude of 3000' AGL. Upon reaching altitude the engines were shut down, cooled and retracted. I soared for 30 minutes, did some more spin exercises to spend my excess altitude and did one re-lite to verify the restart success for the previous weeks testing. Both turbines started successfully and were shut down after a couple of minutes. I returned to the airport for landing and was greeted by my support crew once I rolled onto the taxiway.

    My Oudie flight computer provided all of the finite statistics from the flight. The runway takeoff run was between 850 to 900'. The time to climb to 3000' from a standing start was 4 minutes and 45 seconds. The climb rate from the standing start averaged 631' / minute. Total fuel burn for the takeoff, climb and one restart was 3.5 gallons. Remaining fuel in the header fuel cell was 3.5 gallons.

    Anticipated flight sequence. Self-launch and climb to 3k, shut down the turbines and retract. Utilize one engine for sustained flight if needed at reduced throttle. This should provide a 25 to 30 minute duration run with the remaining 3.5 gallons of fuel.

    Note: The flight test performance results came within 10% of what my preliminary calculations provided. This was quite satisfying and shows that the math can really work for predicting performance results.

    Lots of fun but I am glad it is over,

    Hoping for video and photos from the flight crew later this week,

    Regards,
    Chris
     
    Aerowerx, casperbd, Glider and 2 others like this.
  14. May 2, 2016 #14

    Victor Bravo

    Victor Bravo

    Victor Bravo

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2014
    Messages:
    6,083
    Likes Received:
    4,862
    Location:
    KWHP, Los Angeles CA, USA
    Congratulations !

    Is this the kind of fuel consumption you had predicted? 3 gallons seems pretty high for a 3000 foot climb. I know you were only aiming for a self-launch, not a powerplane, but it still seems kinda high.

    Spectacular technical achievement !
     
  15. May 3, 2016 #15

    Cozyflier

    Cozyflier

    Cozyflier

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2010
    Messages:
    45
    Likes Received:
    48
    Location:
    Waukesha, WI.
    It seems to be about right if not a little better then expected. My goal was to be able to climb to 3K and have enough fuel remaining for a couple of re-lights.
     

Share This Page

arrow_white