Gm engine weights

Discussion in 'Chevy' started by Streffpilot, Aug 16, 2012.

Help Support HomeBuiltAirplanes Forum by donating:

  1. Jul 8, 2015 #21

    spaschke

    spaschke

    spaschke

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2012
    Messages:
    233
    Likes Received:
    58
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    Thanks ekimneirbo. That sounds like a good way to build one.
    I have a 98 vette engine on my Adventurer 333 project right now. Almost ready for final assembly. iron block, aluminum intake, not sure about the heads. About 333 hp and has a belt psru. This is what the plans called for. I am considering an LS engine to lighten it up. I should have all the hp I need with the present engine, so I am not looking for more. But If I could get an engine at least 100 lbs lighter AND then lose the psru, that would be super. But the psru is not real heavy, so I guess keeping it isn't bad. I would rather have fuel injection also.
    I think a cam designed for the needed rpm range would help a lot.
     
  2. Jul 8, 2015 #22

    ekimneirbo

    ekimneirbo

    ekimneirbo

    Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2014
    Messages:
    1,009
    Likes Received:
    324
    Location:
    Deep South
    I hope your Adventurer project works well for you.:)

    If you decide to pursue the use of an LS engine, you might watch Craigs List and Ebay for someone parting out a 6.0 liter LQ4 or LQ9 engine....or just selling some heads and maybe the used camshaft outright. The reason I say this is because they have excellent ports (like LS6 engines) but have larger combustion chambers. The 241 casting for the LS1 has a 67.3 cc combustion chamber, while the LQ4/LQ9 (317 casting) has a 71.06 cc chamber and will help keep compression down in a stroker engine. Used LS1 blocks can be found cheaply, but they are very limited on oversize. I have read anywhere from .010 max to .030 max. Less than
    perfect placement of the liners in the block can cause thin cylinder walls.....so I would recommend using a new block. As far as camshaft selection goes,the
    consensus seems to be that cylinder filling is what to strive for at lower rpms. I think that while a new $300 aftermarket cam might? help, a $25 stock truck cam may do quite well. I would think the completed engine would be dyno tested to see where the power curve is with a stock cam before investing in a
    aftermarket one. Here are a couple of attachments which will give you some food for thought. Like everything, this is an opinion, but it was written by a
    very knowledgeable person.


    Aircraft Engine Cam 1 001.jpg Aircraft Engine Cam 2 001.jpg Camshaft Tech 1.jpg Cam Specs Lyc 001.jpg

    One more thing, the truck intakes are kinda ugly but
    can be dressed up a little with removal of the unneeded stuff. I haven't looked lately, but I found almost new/low mileage truck manifolds with the fuel rails and injectors but no throttle body for about $150. If you watch ebay and check regularly you can find real deals on these components. You can't even buy injectors for what I gave for the whole shebang. If someone sits down and takes the time to decide what components they want and scans ebay for a time, they can come up with most of the needed components extremely cheaply.....because the parts you need are the discards that high performance engine builders don't want and there isn't much market for them....sooo they are cheap to buy.
     
    Last edited: Jul 8, 2015
    spaschke likes this.
  3. Jul 8, 2015 #23

    ekimneirbo

    ekimneirbo

    ekimneirbo

    Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2014
    Messages:
    1,009
    Likes Received:
    324
    Location:
    Deep South
  4. Jul 9, 2015 #24

    Toobuilder

    Toobuilder

    Toobuilder

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2010
    Messages:
    4,466
    Likes Received:
    3,264
    Location:
    Mojave, Ca
    If you have 98 vette engine, then you have an all aluminum LS-1, which showed up in the Corvette in 97.
     
  5. Jul 9, 2015 #25

    spaschke

    spaschke

    spaschke

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2012
    Messages:
    233
    Likes Received:
    58
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    I'll check again. :) Just bought the project earlier this year. recommended engine was a Chevrolet HO350. Previous owner got the vette engine and had it rebuilt.
    Thanks for the great info.
     
  6. Jul 9, 2015 #26

    ekimneirbo

    ekimneirbo

    ekimneirbo

    Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2014
    Messages:
    1,009
    Likes Received:
    324
    Location:
    Deep South
    GM used the smallblock Chevy from 1955 until about 1991/92 then also continued its use in some trucks for a while. In 92/93 they changed to a reverse coolant flow which sent
    the coolant through the heads first and then on down to the block. This was a nice engine and it was produced in a couple of different displacements. It was used in several GM
    cars (buicks etc). The best version will come from the Corvette/Camaro, displaced 5.7 liters (350 cu in) and was called the LT1. It had aluminum heads,and a cast iron block.
    The intake manifold on it was for fuel injection, sat very low, and was made of aluminum. This was still a smallblock Chevy engine for all intents and purposes.

    In 97/98 GM produced the aluminum block and aluminum head LS1 for the first time. The intake manifold on it will be plastic.

    As time moved on, GM started producing different displacements for use in SUVs and trucks.........these often used various combinations of cast iron blocks,
    aluminum blocks,cast iron heads,and aluminum heads. If you have an LS engine, the back of the block should have a number like 5.7 or 5.0 cast into it.
    Also, the heads will have a 3 digit number cast into them up by the end of the valve cover. That will tell you a lot about what you have.

    If the engine has a carburetor, then it is probably a version of the original smallblock chevy, although carburetors can be mounted on LS engines by using
    a different intake manifold and something to power the ignition. If you are unsure what you have, download a couple of pictures of the engine and I'll try
    to help you determine what you have.

    LT1.jpg 6.0 Casting.jpg images.jpg
     
    Last edited: Jul 9, 2015
  7. Jul 10, 2015 #27

    Bin31

    Bin31

    Bin31

    Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2015
    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    France
    Do you consider inverting the engine in the direct drive option ?
     
  8. Jul 10, 2015 #28

    ekimneirbo

    ekimneirbo

    ekimneirbo

    Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2014
    Messages:
    1,009
    Likes Received:
    324
    Location:
    Deep South
    Yes, I would probably invert a V8 if I installed it in a high wing airplane.
    The reason is to raise the thrust line closer to the wings and lessen the pendulum effect when power is applied or reduced. If installing a V8 in a low wing aircraft, I would
    mount it conventionally as the thrust line is near the wing that way.

    If you choose to invert an engine, I would look at some of the modifications made by Steve Wittman on his Olds V8. Several things were done to insure oil reached components
    like the timing chain. The heavy LS oil pan could be removed and replaced with a light weight plate or pan that has a lower profile. GM uses a stamped metal pan on LS short
    blocks that might work if you can find one. This means you would have to locate an oil reservoir somewhere else. One thing to consider is some kind of clip, bracket, or
    rev kit that would prevent a lifter from falling out of its hole. If one fell out, you would lose most if not all of your oil pressure.

    There are several benefits to inverting an engine. For one thing, the heads are the low point in the cooling system,so there should be no air pockets trapped in them that
    would cause the exhaust valve to run hot, and you can probably get away with reasonably high compression ratios. With the LS engine you have no "distributor" per se,
    so you don't have to worry about oil leakage or saturated points. It might be preferrable to use the early 97-98 heads that have perimeter bolts on the valve covers,
    although I think the center bolt heads probably would be fine.
     
  9. Aug 15, 2015 #29

    TXFlyGuy

    TXFlyGuy

    TXFlyGuy

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2012
    Messages:
    1,507
    Likes Received:
    437
    Location:
    Republic of Texas
    I just ordered the LS3 crate engine. It will be installed in our T-51D Mustang. The Titan factory is already flying an LC9 5.3 Litre 327. I have flown this engine...unbelievable power!

    The PSRU is a 1.9 to 1 ratio. Max T/O rpm will be 4,500. The prop will turn 2,370 rpm. The engine will make 350 hp at this speed.
     
  10. Aug 15, 2015 #30

    BoeveP51

    BoeveP51

    BoeveP51

    Well-Known Member Lifetime Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2008
    Messages:
    97
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Spring Hill, FL - formerly W. Ossipee, NH
    Are you going to use the PSRU from Titan ?
     
  11. Aug 15, 2015 #31

    TXFlyGuy

    TXFlyGuy

    TXFlyGuy

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2012
    Messages:
    1,507
    Likes Received:
    437
    Location:
    Republic of Texas
    The gearbox is an Autoflight / Titan PSRU. From New Zealand.
     
  12. Sep 5, 2015 #32

    Goatherder

    Goatherder

    Goatherder

    Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2013
    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    16
    Location:
    Olympia WA / Itajai, Brasil
    I built an aluminum 4.3 V6. As pictured engine (with a gawd-awful heavy road-race oil pan) weighs 275lbs. With 1.53 gearbox weighs 350. Hp should be around 300. I think I can make an aluminum pan and knock a few pounds off. Here's a picture of it mounted on a test stand. Turns a 66x74 Catto pusher prop about 2500 rpm. Will power a jumbo-sized Long-EZ


    attachment_php_attachmentid_7101_d_1387726536.jpg
     
    Last edited: Sep 6, 2015
    BobbyZ, mcrae0104, stol and 1 other person like this.
  13. Sep 5, 2015 #33

    rv6ejguy

    rv6ejguy

    rv6ejguy

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2012
    Messages:
    3,749
    Likes Received:
    2,791
    Location:
    Calgary, Alberta, Canada
    What gearbox is that?
     
  14. Sep 6, 2015 #34

    Goatherder

    Goatherder

    Goatherder

    Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2013
    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    16
    Location:
    Olympia WA / Itajai, Brasil
    Last edited: Sep 6, 2015
  15. Sep 6, 2015 #35

    stol

    stol

    stol

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2008
    Messages:
    497
    Likes Received:
    145
    Location:
    Jackson Hole Wyoming

    I am impressed....
     
  16. Sep 6, 2015 #36

    Goatherder

    Goatherder

    Goatherder

    Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2013
    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    16
    Location:
    Olympia WA / Itajai, Brasil
    Also, if you go on YouTube and search for "Marc's v-6 4", posted by mfryer100...you can see us blowin' leaves. Plug in your speakers...the sound is good.
     

Share This Page



arrow_white