• Welcome aboard HomebuiltAirplanes.com, your destination for connecting with a thriving community of more than 10,000 active members, all passionate about home-built aviation. Dive into our comprehensive repository of knowledge, exchange technical insights, arrange get-togethers, and trade aircrafts/parts with like-minded enthusiasts. Unearth a wide-ranging collection of general and kit plane aviation subjects, enriched with engaging imagery, in-depth technical manuals, and rare archives.

    For a nominal fee of $99.99/year or $12.99/month, you can immerse yourself in this dynamic community and unparalleled treasure-trove of aviation knowledge.

    Embark on your journey now!

    Click Here to Become a Premium Member and Experience Homebuilt Airplanes to the Fullest!

Fuel sock instead of finger strainer

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

12notes

Well-Known Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2014
Messages
1,286
Location
Louisville, KY
I've been looking at the finger strainers I got from Aircraft Spruce, and I'm pretty disappointed with them. The hole size looks to be somewhere between 1/32"-1/16", which would pass through particles large enough to kill a fuel pump or carburetor. I'll have fuel filters for that, but why aren't fuel socks used? Something like this:
https://www.racetronix.biz/product.asp?ic=ffs-260g

It filters down to 30 microns, it has a bigger surface area to collect fuel, and they are pretty much bulletproof in cars, they usually only get changed if the in-tank fuel pump dies.

I understand I'd need a internal pipe from the external fuel line connection to the sock. Is there some reason these aren't used in aircraft, or that the finger strainers are the norm?
 
Back
Top