Ford/Mazda Duratec 23/25 Semi Direct Drive, is this feasible?

Discussion in 'Ford' started by Jonathan_Schmidt, Mar 21, 2013.

Help Support HomeBuiltAirplanes Forum by donating:

  1. Mar 21, 2013 #1

    Jonathan_Schmidt

    Jonathan_Schmidt

    Jonathan_Schmidt

    New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2013
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Norco, CA USA
    Greetings,

    I've been reading your responses and posts and find this site wonderfully useful for dreaming. I have, sadly, a dream that keeps sticking around. I'm working on a Bucker Jungmann replica. I've got plans from multiple vendors, and have been performing CAD, structural analysis and modeling of the aircraft. It seems buildable. I need a reliable engine of about 90HP. When I look at the power curves of the Duratec 23 in my Ford Ranger, it seems to line up, if I accept the weight penalties. So here's the topic for discussion. If I use a prop designed for a Jabiru that spins as fast as 3300 RPM, and I use the engine directly, and derate it down to 100 HP, I'm well within the Power/RPM curves. If I attack the propellar to the draveshaft, but support the shaft with a axial load bearing, I don't think I'm applying too much beyond what the engine is designed to do. The engine is heavyish, but still within the weight the aircraft can weight and balance for. I'll admit I'm attracted to the engine's cost. $3,500 NIB isn't too bad. I'm also attracted to the cowling, the plane will look like an HE51 when complete. I also look forward to the testing, I'm an operational test and evaluation engineer, afterall. I've anticipated the machining that needs to be done, and I'm fairly good on my old Vert Mill. So what did I miss, it can't be that easy.
     
  2. May 14, 2013 #2

    wizzardworks

    wizzardworks

    wizzardworks

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2011
    Messages:
    273
    Likes Received:
    41
    Location:
    murfreesboro NC USA
    Jonathan, Along with axial loads there are large gyroscopic loads and thrust loads to account for. These three loads must be supported external to the engine and on a shaft with a diameter that is likely larger than the rear crankshaft bearing diameter of a 2.3 liter engine.
    wizzardworks
     
  3. May 14, 2013 #3

    PTAirco

    PTAirco

    PTAirco

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2003
    Messages:
    3,477
    Likes Received:
    1,000
    Location:
    Corona CA

Share This Page



arrow_white