Flight Helmets?

Discussion in 'Rules and Regulations / Flight Safety / Better Pil' started by TXFlyGuy, Jun 16, 2019.

Help Support HomeBuiltAirplanes Forum by donating:

  1. Aug 28, 2019 #141

    BJC

    BJC

    BJC

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2013
    Messages:
    9,490
    Likes Received:
    6,249
    Location:
    97FL, Florida, USA
    Steve:

    If you think that the field of view that a NASCAR driver has is adequate for an airplane pilot, then please do not fly VFR.
    upload_2019-8-28_2-44-42.jpeg

    BJC
     
    Mcmark likes this.
  2. Aug 28, 2019 #142

    Mcmark

    Mcmark

    Mcmark

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2013
    Messages:
    269
    Likes Received:
    126
    Location:
    Owings, MD
    [​IMG]Been chewing my tongue til it's bleeding. We agree to disagree!!!
     
  3. Aug 28, 2019 #143

    RSD

    RSD

    RSD

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2019
    Messages:
    164
    Likes Received:
    31
    I don't think that seats with fixed head restraint wings are practical for aviation.
     
    SVSUSteve likes this.
  4. Aug 28, 2019 #144

    BJC

    BJC

    BJC

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2013
    Messages:
    9,490
    Likes Received:
    6,249
    Location:
    97FL, Florida, USA
    Yes - that was my point.


    BJC
     
  5. Aug 28, 2019 #145

    Wanttaja

    Wanttaja

    Wanttaja

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2013
    Messages:
    1,225
    Likes Received:
    1,392
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    In any case, helmet hair *IS* real. I shot this picture of myself after I got home from flying....my hair doesn't normally part crosswise.

    [​IMG]

    Ron Wanttaja
     
    Topaz likes this.
  6. Aug 28, 2019 #146

    Topaz

    Topaz

    Topaz

    Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2005
    Messages:
    13,623
    Likes Received:
    5,275
    Location:
    Orange County, California
    Clearly there are strong opinions all around. There are always ways to be "more safe", and effective ways at that, although they will extract their own cost in their own ways. It's easy to say, "Safety is our top priority!" but when it becomes the primary target, a lot of utility tends to go out the window. In the end, safety and utility must be balanced, and that balance is going to be different for every application and every individual.

    [​IMG]
    Acknowledging that someone else's chosen balance is different than yours, but equally valid, is the only way to go. Bringing strings of asterisks into the discussion isn't going to solve anything.

    But helmet head is a tragedy, no matter how you look at it. And Ron, I can't stop staring. o_O :D
     
    Last edited: Aug 28, 2019
    Derswede likes this.
  7. Aug 28, 2019 #147

    Aesquire

    Aesquire

    Aesquire

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2014
    Messages:
    2,298
    Likes Received:
    915
    Location:
    Rochester, NY, USA
    I've gotten grief for my your choice attitude on helmets on motorcycles for..... 21st century? Ok, since they were hand laid up fiberglass, and long before Bell ( which folded, but another company bought the brand name ) started it's advertising campaign "It you've got a $10 head, but a $10 helmet".

    https://www.motorstate.com/IfYouveGot.htm

    just like there's lots of stupid reasons not to wear protective gear, like seat belts, there are lots of reasons to make wearing them mandatory.

    "It will save insurance rates". Always been a lie. Sure, it saves the insurance company some money, but I have never seen my rates cut as each law requiring gear passes. And no one else I've met ever bragged their bill went down.

    "It will reduce the burden of the public paying for the health care of the brain damaged" Ok, that's true. It's a slippery slope that can only end in outlawing anything even possibly dangerous, however. I know this sounds horrible, but head injured 18 year old boys are a prime source of transplant organs. If politicians were being practical, a donor card would be a licence to not wear a helmet.

    The best reasons are never heard. "It's much nicer for the first responders not to have to deal with brain tissue all over the scene" ( personal experience ) And my favorite seat belt joke. " It helps the ambulance crew to find the crash victim" because climbing down a cliff to retrieve the guy thrown through his windshield is dangerous, and hauling a stretcher up the cliff is hard work. ( been there )

    Still, you choose your own path. I'll insult your choice. Fair's fair. You get to, too.

    And while I have mocked half helmets on motorcycles, I've personally seen them save lives. They don't do much to protect your face, but for bouncing your skull off pavement, airframes, or canopies, they are light years better than nothing. Pick one that goes low enough in back to cover the Occipital.

    Bicycle helmets are one use items. With a lifespan as the foam ages. But they mass nearly nothing, are cheap, can ventilated the head well, and again, are far better than nothing.

    The downside is helmet hair, stupid people making fun of you, and it may be destroyed already on a second impact. Consider Elliot Seguin's crash, where a bicycle helmet might not have been enough to do the job.

    https://fearoflanding.com/accidents/accident-reports/experimental-jet-crashes-in-mojave/

    Ultimately it's your choice. Advice is freely offered. Helmets have saved my life, so I admit both bias, and hard earned experience.
     
  8. Aug 28, 2019 #148

    wsimpso1

    wsimpso1

    wsimpso1

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2003
    Messages:
    5,781
    Likes Received:
    3,007
    Location:
    Saline Michigan
    In fairness, the viewing out if a race car is pretty much in the horizontal plane of the drivers eyes. Head on a swivel is important in airplanes, but is not sufficient. We need to see down and back at a 45 on both sides for the traffic pattern, we need to see up and forward in steep turns, lazy eights, wingovers, and box canyon turnarounds, and we need to see straight up to pick up the horizon twice in each loop. A lot of airplanes have skylights or bubble canopies for a reason.

    Since most of us fly with three point harness and without helmets, what say we work toward getting everybody's torso securely connected to the seat and wearing a helmet before we get too far into how much like a NASCAR racer we should go with our little airplanes...

    Billski
     
    Topaz likes this.
  9. Aug 29, 2019 #149

    PTAirco

    PTAirco

    PTAirco

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2003
    Messages:
    3,475
    Likes Received:
    994
    Location:
    Corona CA
    I think most of us have the Bingelis' books and they are full of useful stuff. But it is fair to point out potentially dangerous practices.
     
  10. Aug 29, 2019 #150

    litespeed

    litespeed

    litespeed

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2008
    Messages:
    1,412
    Likes Received:
    262
    Location:
    Sydney
    For starters,

    Most race cars do not have a seat like that.
    You are not driving a race car

    The general principles apply only, any other comparison is been used as a excuse not to wear a helmet.

    If I can get a comfortable helmet to ride with including the need to look behind me, sideways etc to look for traffic- you can also for a aircraft.

    I have never had a vision issue with a quality open face, mine includes a flip down screen and even a flip down sun visor. Looks a lot like a flight helmet and has the same vision ability.

    Stop making excuses.

    Helmet hair, really if your reason is looks or been subject to comments from people who would rather be dead than mess their hair- you should get yourself a spine.

    Also, trust me your hair will look real bad with your brains and blood all over it.

    [​IMG]
     
  11. Aug 29, 2019 #151

    SheepdogRD

    SheepdogRD

    SheepdogRD

    Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2010
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Winston, GA, USA
    What helmet do you wear?
     
  12. Aug 30, 2019 #152

    Topaz

    Topaz

    Topaz

    Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2005
    Messages:
    13,623
    Likes Received:
    5,275
    Location:
    Orange County, California
    In fact, in terms of this discussion, we're not talking about driving a car at all, and yet any and all of the reasoning given here for airplane use applies equally to a road car. And yet how many of you drive to work - using a car - with a helmet on?

    I don't think anyone is. Nor is anyone explicitly arguing that nobody should wear helmets. What you're missing is that this is truly an individual choice, an individual balancing of risk versus benefit. If you choose to wear a helmet when flying, hey, more power to you. If I choose not to, that's my choice. Don't take the choices made by other people so personally. They're not saying you're wrong. They just haven't made the same choice you have.
     
    SVSUSteve and Mcmark like this.
  13. Aug 30, 2019 #153

    Aesquire

    Aesquire

    Aesquire

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2014
    Messages:
    2,298
    Likes Received:
    915
    Location:
    Rochester, NY, USA
    To clear up a few misconceptions.
    Motorcycle helmets only here, not industrial or other.
    In the U.S. there are 2 basic "levels" of helmet certification. DOT & Snell.

    Everything legal for street use must be one or the other. They differ in impact resistance, ( penetration ) and energy absorption.

    There are European standards, ECE & BSI...

    Some U.S. Racing organizations require Snell, and some also accept ECE.

    In the past, Snell standards required a "harder" helmet than DOT, which passed more impact energy to the head, but better protected against multiple impact penetration. But recently that gap has narrowed, as Snell changed to reduce energy transfer.

    This is an over simplified version of a very complex subject. Bikers have argued endlessly about which is better. My pragmatic opinion is buy what is required by the rules of your organization. If there are no rules you need to comply with, buy what fits you best. Anybody's standard, not cheap untested junk.

    The minor technical differences are unimportant compared to fit.

    https://www.motorcyclelegalfoundation.com/the-safest-motorcycle-helmet-you-can-buy/#bsi

    https://silodrome.com/snell-vs-dot-vs-ece-r22-05-helmet-standards-throwdown/

    https://ultimatemotorcycling.com/20...ds-2019-changes-fim-frhphe-ece2205-dot-snell/

    I have used DOT & BSI Helmets.

    And.... In the everything you know is wrong category, while there once upon a time was a difference between "plastic" & "fiberglass" helmets, if they both pass the standards, performance is acceptable, if not identical. Again, fit is more important.

    What do I use? I have a HJC modular with flip up chin bar. It's a decade old and overdue for replacement. It's a fairly inexpensive helmet, ( $229 retail ) DOT.

    And a Suomy Spec 1-R, full face. BSI. Expensive, feather light. ($695 retail )

    Both models are discontinued. Both have adequate peripheral vision. The Suomy has great ventilation, not adjustable, and is loud. That only matters in an open cockpit.
     
    SVSUSteve likes this.
  14. Sep 5, 2019 #154

    SVSUSteve

    SVSUSteve

    SVSUSteve

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2007
    Messages:
    3,871
    Likes Received:
    924
    Location:
    Indianapolis, IN
    I was referring to the HANS device not the "wings" on the newer seats which (even in my safety first mindset) are complete overkill.

    It's a matter of picking out what works for a new application and figuring out how to fit it in a way that does cause problems. There are ways to make a HANS device work in an aircraft without interfering with other functions. The cause of most neck injuries (and lot of the basilar skull trauma) is the result of the head and the torso decelerating at different rates. If you have something to tie those two together, you'd probably eliminate 75% of cervical fractures. If you kept the chin from bouncing off the chest, you'd cut the rate of basilar skull fractures (one of the most common fatal injuries) and aortic trauma (another leading cause of death; which is often caused (at least in part) by compression of the anterior chest wall next to the sternum) in half.

    You would not even have to hook the HANS to the seat. The shoulder harnesses (let's be honest....anyone going for this would have four or five point restraints) would restrain the torso but still allow the range of motion necessary to reach stuff, etc.

    You and I both know that I don't like VFR flying anymore and that "see and avoid" is a complete joke under most real world circumstances for your average person without flawless eyesight (which I don't have). There's a reason why even the FAA is going to "sense, see, and avoid".

    Then again, you also know I don't trust other pilots to follow the rules when they don't think anyone is watching. I'm looking forward to the ADS-B mandate because then at least there's a chance of knowing about the guy who refuses to make radio calls and comes barreling in on a straight-in final*.

    *-Before anyone says it, yes, these guys are often coming off of an IFR flight. LOL
     
  15. Sep 5, 2019 #155

    SVSUSteve

    SVSUSteve

    SVSUSteve

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2007
    Messages:
    3,871
    Likes Received:
    924
    Location:
    Indianapolis, IN
    Even I am not arguing for them being mandatory. I don't want them to be mandatory because that will just make the "fighting the man" "don't tread on me" BS come out in spades. We have enough problem with that as it is.

    Actually, I think helmets are pretty much something that only needs to be worn during landing and takeoff unless you're doing something that adds risk (aerobatics, cropdusting, scud running, riding with Jack Roush, etc).
     
    Topaz likes this.
  16. Sep 5, 2019 #156

    SVSUSteve

    SVSUSteve

    SVSUSteve

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2007
    Messages:
    3,871
    Likes Received:
    924
    Location:
    Indianapolis, IN
    Thanks Captain Obvious. LOL

    No offense meant RSD. You just walked into that one.
     
  17. Sep 5, 2019 #157

    SVSUSteve

    SVSUSteve

    SVSUSteve

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2007
    Messages:
    3,871
    Likes Received:
    924
    Location:
    Indianapolis, IN
    Once again, Billski delivers.

    I actually am trying to include as much plexiglass in my designs as I can manage. It gives me better visibility and it weighs less than "regular" structure.

    I'd just like to get everyone installing and using at least a three point restraint (preferably a 5-point; as a side point, I think a 5-point harness is more comfortable). I've lost count of how many people I have seen with their seat's torso restraint behind them after crashes. It is depressing as **** when the only fatal injury is from them bouncing their face off the panel.
     
    wsimpso1 likes this.

Share This Page

arrow_white