• Welcome aboard HomebuiltAirplanes.com, your destination for connecting with a thriving community of more than 10,000 active members, all passionate about home-built aviation. Dive into our comprehensive repository of knowledge, exchange technical insights, arrange get-togethers, and trade aircrafts/parts with like-minded enthusiasts. Unearth a wide-ranging collection of general and kit plane aviation subjects, enriched with engaging imagery, in-depth technical manuals, and rare archives.

    For a nominal fee of $99.99/year or $12.99/month, you can immerse yourself in this dynamic community and unparalleled treasure-trove of aviation knowledge.

    Embark on your journey now!

    Click Here to Become a Premium Member and Experience Homebuilt Airplanes to the Fullest!

Ercoupe-like cantilever wing in wood

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

cluttonfred

Well-Known Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2010
Messages
10,724
Location
World traveler
I have mentioned before my appreciation for Fred Weick's Ercoupe design, especially the wing construction, but I also prefer working with wood. A few wooden Ercoupes were actually designed and built during WWII in an attempt to use non-strategic material but nothing came of it. They were reportedly a little heavier but much quieter than the metal and fabric originals. The pen and ink drawing below is actually the wooden version with the distinctive reinforcing ribs on either side of the cockpit.
ercoupe wing cutaway.jpgwooden ercoupe details.jpgercoup wing upside down.jpg
I am most interested in adapting the Ercoupe-style Warren-truss two-spar wing to a simple, fabric-covered cantilever monoplane, my stab at a 21st century VP-2. The idea would be to go with a square-cut, constant-chord wing and full-span ailerons to reduce the parts count to just four ribs (end ribs, diagonals, nose ribs, aileron ribs). I could also see doing the wing in three sections (straight center section without ailerons, outer sections with ailerons and dihedral) to reduce workshop size requirements. Overall it seems like a very straightforward way to go, eliminating compression struts or ribs and drag/anti-drag bracing, but I'd love some feedback on the pros and cons.

Cheers,

Matthew
 
Back
Top