I do not particularly like the scheme on several levels.
The conventional hex bolt going through a tubular end on both the mount and the fuselage is torqued, putting the bolt in tension that is above the largest load that would open the joint. This preload prevents the threaded regions from seeing large load variations, which largely precludes fatigue, and is all standard fastener design stuff. LOTS of history...
This design puts two1/4" bolts or pins in double shear on the fuselage end. That may appear strong enough, but they will see all of the cyclic load applied to the mount, so in addition to analyzing for stress, mean load, cyclic load, stress concentrations, and fatigue, you get to analyze the pins or bolts for all that too. Bolts should not see cyclic loads - they work far far better under lots of preload and then friction and joint stiffness preventing fatigue.
At the other end, you appear to be applying a nut to clamp the mount to the flange, and that is good practice, but I still have a great big concern. Usually this is done with a fastener that has its threads rolled in, then heat treated and Cd plated. This produces a bolt of consistent and fairly high strength, excellent fatigue resistance (for a bolt) , and excellent corrosion resistance. None of this can be said for your part. I suspect it will be turned and the thread cut. Maybe it will be heat treated, maybe sprayed with corrosion preventative.
As to materials, few on here might recommend a material, but you are designing this piece, you are responsible for the design, and you will have your neck on the line. Specifying material and heat treat to ensure long term survival of several of these per airplane really requires detailed review of the design space for all fixed and variable loads, cyclic loading, etc, then analysis of the design under this spectrum of loads to select suitable material, heat treat, and preservative in use.
Billski