Elytron 2S - the first commercial tiltrotor?

HomeBuiltAirplanes.com

Help Support HomeBuiltAirplanes.com:

Xanadrone

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2011
Messages
195
Location
Bucharest Romania
Elytron 2S: The out-of-the-box tiltrotor concept
...shows a rather interesting concept of tiltrotor VTOL craft (it will be presented at Oshkosh too on the 3th of August), even if it's not totally new.

The boxwing "Prandtl" scheme at least it's not new at all, maybe just the smaller rotating wing (100 degrees span) "in-between", supporting two nacelles/engines with fixed pitch props if I remember it well.

What's your opinion about it? Let alone the recognised difficulty of the transition flight-phases (maybe easier to resolve with the actual hi-tech electronics), I wonder if this concept is viable and maybe less prone to test-crashes, like the V-22 Osprey was.

elytron-6.jpg
 
Last edited:

TFF

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2010
Messages
13,064
Location
Memphis, TN
I doubt it is VTOL with the limited tilt. With any tilt rotor the two problems are going to be keeping both power plants going and having one rotor in a settling with power situation which can happen with a slow hovering crosswind turn. Minor other problems making hp per pound. Ambitious. Agusta 609s have been around for a long time; no one has liked the cost overruns which have been about a million a year per example if someone would buy one; they need to sell 20 before they will release.
 

kenkad

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2011
Messages
53
Location
union grove, al 35175
Looks nice. Seems I have seen that kind of design in a single passenger concept that has dual counter rotating ducted fans. I did contact them and asked how they computed the NP for that joined wing since I could not get any useful information on HBA. I am curious if they will respond.
kenkad
 

Jay Kempf

Curmudgeon in Training (CIT)
Lifetime Supporter
Joined
Apr 13, 2009
Messages
3,944
Location
Warren, VT USA
Elytron 2S: The out-of-the-box tiltrotor concept
...shows a rather interesting concept of tiltrotor VTOL craft (it will be presented at Oshkosh too on the 3th of August), even if it's not totally new.

The boxwing "Prandtl" scheme at least it's not new at all, maybe just the smaller rotating wing (100 degrees span) "in-between", supporting two nacelles/engines with fixed pitch props if I remember it well.

What's your opinion about it? Let alone the recognised difficulty of the transition flight-phases (maybe easier to resolve with the actual hi-tech electronics), I wonder if this concept is viable and maybe less prone to test-crashes, like the V-22 Osprey was.

View attachment 33503
I ain't gonna sit in that cabin looking at those blades right next to my body. Looks like a food processor. It would seem that four rotors would be a better solution but then there is the idea that you need collective rotor heads to control it. I thought this sort of stuff was already ruled out due to control issues and power to weight. Quad copters deal with control with very reactive motors and fancy electronics. If this thin is a turbine how could they possibly control it in hover? Transition with control, etc...?

As concepts go this one seems to have every bad idea in one platform. Just my opinion. I have been looking closely at multirotor VTOL concepts of late due to some UAV things I am working on. Looks like someone did a tiny bit of math about power and disc loading and convinced themselves that this is viable. I think tilt rotors are viable but this seems like it has too many points of single failure designed in. The box wing seems completely out of place and counter to the rest of the design intent.
 

Jon Ferguson

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2011
Messages
827
Location
Harpers Ferry, WV
I ain't gonna sit in that cabin looking at those blades right next to my body. Looks like a food processor. It would seem that four rotors would be a better solution but then there is the idea that you need collective rotor heads to control it. I thought this sort of stuff was already ruled out due to control issues and power to weight. Quad copters deal with control with very reactive motors and fancy electronics. If this thin is a turbine how could they possibly control it in hover? Transition with control, etc...?

As concepts go this one seems to have every bad idea in one platform. Just my opinion. I have been looking closely at multirotor VTOL concepts of late due to some UAV things I am working on. Looks like someone did a tiny bit of math about power and disc loading and convinced themselves that this is viable. I think tilt rotors are viable but this seems like it has too many points of single failure designed in. The box wing seems completely out of place and counter to the rest of the design intent.
First time I saw an A-26 I thought the same thing... Those props look mighty close.
 

autoreply

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2009
Messages
10,751
Location
Rotterdam, Netherlands
Lots of fancy renderings, but whether there is any solid engineering behind it?


Propwash/wing interaction is going to be interesting.

Non-cyclic props work just fine on a small scale, but you run into a brick wall at higher inertias. Not sure where those values would be and a hybrid with light composite props in this range might actually be do-able.

Overall I like the concept.

Now let's see one flying.
 

revkev6

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2010
Messages
425
Location
massachusetts
this plane is similar in concept to the canadair Cl-84.... which was a successful aircraft, just not landing any contracts.

this plane has two glaring issues imo. the article claims their will be no cyclic or collective control of the blades. the cl-84 had collective control that was connected to the throttle. the engines could not react fast enough to maintain precise power in a hover so they changed blade angle to make it faster. the engine governors would then level out the control and reduce the pitch change of the prop.

even though the cl-84 did not have cyclic it did have a tail rotor and a horizontal stabilizer that changed incidence to maintain pitch control in hover and transition.

this plane is just a sketch that will never work correctly IMO.
 

TFF

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2010
Messages
13,064
Location
Memphis, TN
I hope they get more prop to that than the toy ones on there, if the plan to hover.
 

Topaz

Super Moderator
Staff member
Log Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2005
Messages
14,110
Location
Orange County, California
How exactly is this thing controlled during hover and, more importantly, during transition? They say it has "four control surfaces" on the little stub wings, but that's not going to be much control power compared to the moments generated by induced flow and gusts on the (much larger) box-wing.

I don't know enough about this design, really, but if that's their only means of control in powered-lift flight and transition, I think these guys have vastly underestimated the three-axis control power they'll need for this thing during such critical phases of flight.
 

Topaz

Super Moderator
Staff member
Log Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2005
Messages
14,110
Location
Orange County, California
Well, at least they're building hardware. That's further than some of us get :)

But yeah, not very workable IMO.
I would've liked to see them spend a little less on such a "flashy" demonstrator and instead build more of a hover and transition "mule" first. I don't mind the box wing. I don't even necessarily mind the box wing with the stub-wing prop-rotors. But control power during hover and transition seems... iffy at best. If I can see them make a full transition from hover to horizontal flight and back again, then I'll be a believer.
 

Apollo

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2010
Messages
301
Location
Southern California, USA
I would've liked to see them spend a little less on such a "flashy" demonstrator and instead build more of a hover and transition "mule" first. I don't mind the box wing. I don't even necessarily mind the box wing with the stub-wing prop-rotors. But control power during hover and transition seems... iffy at best. If I can see them make a full transition from hover to horizontal flight and back again, then I'll be a believer.
I'd be satisfied with a video of a quarter-scale model showing the transition from hover to flight and then back again. Of course it doesn't exist. Outfits like this want investors' money without any significant proof that their concept is viable. I'm not going to feel sorry for the investors though, who obviously didn't perform any due diligence.
 

BBerson

Light Plane Philosopher
HBA Supporter
Joined
Dec 16, 2007
Messages
13,275
Location
Port Townsend WA
I looked at the full size mockup yesterday. Will attend their forum today(4pm).
The RC model does fly, a bit rough but works.

It is has motorcycle engine with shafts to twin props. Looked like ordinary props.
More info later.
 
Top