Electric and Counter Rotation

Discussion in 'Electric Propulsion' started by RonL, Apr 2, 2019.

Help Support HomeBuiltAirplanes Forum by donating:

  1. May 24, 2019 #61

    henryk

    henryk

    henryk

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2010
    Messages:
    4,547
    Likes Received:
    417
    Location:
    krakow,poland
    BTW=classic gear (reductor 3:1) have similar weight and volume,
    big reaction momentum.

    CR differential gear have 1/3 of this reaction momentum.
     
  2. May 24, 2019 #62

    blane.c

    blane.c

    blane.c

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2015
    Messages:
    2,888
    Likes Received:
    492
    Location:
    capital district NY
    Logic dictates than when using two propellers counter rotating, that the loss of one propeller is greater than a 50% loss in efficiency. So if the loss of a propeller keeps you flying "ok".
     
  3. May 25, 2019 #63

    henryk

    henryk

    henryk

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2010
    Messages:
    4,547
    Likes Received:
    417
    Location:
    krakow,poland
    F=m*a...=m*(a1+a2)

    (second propeller accelerate air mass too...)

    in case of differential gear the RPM of ich is in inverted proportion
    to the drag momentums.
     
  4. May 25, 2019 #64

    daveklingler

    daveklingler

    daveklingler

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    49
    Likes Received:
    11
    Location:
    Albuquerque
    Like I said, contra-rotating props are kind of the killer app for electric motors. You can get redundant motors for not much extra weight, because motors have gotten so amazingly light anyway. There is no gear reduction.

    The title of the thread is "electric and gear reduction counter rotation". :)
     
    Last edited: May 26, 2019
  5. May 25, 2019 #65

    RonL

    RonL

    RonL

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2007
    Messages:
    430
    Likes Received:
    20
    Location:
    Texas
    I agree with what you said, but I think the latest bit of conversation caused your eyes to play a trick on your mind, the thread title "Electric and Counter Rotation" :)
     
  6. May 25, 2019 #66

    wsimpso1

    wsimpso1

    wsimpso1

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2003
    Messages:
    5,627
    Likes Received:
    2,866
    Location:
    Saline Michigan
    If you read me just a little less narrowly, you get the same conclusion. The second prop, whether gear driven in the opposite direction or by splitting power into two motors, still requires extra "stuff" to run that a single prop does not. In electrics that is unavoidably some extra weight from duplication of many elements, bearings between the shafts, etc. And running more blades, even with areas reduced, is unavoidably some extra blade drag from more root and tip interfaces, blade wake interactions, etc. The added weight must be carried (induced drag on the airframe increases) and the efficiency gains are less than we would hope. The efficiency has to result in more power expressed in moving air than the complexity and weight costs you or there is no point in the exercise.

    The reason we already know about this, is these same things have been gone through on a number of other similar manner. Single vs multiple piston engines driving props, single vs multiple turbine engines driving props, single vs multiple jets, counter rotating props on piston and then on turbine powered airplanes, single vs multiple turbine engines on helocopters, etc. The arguments that motors are small and light so multiplicity has less impact have been made with jets and turboprops (fixed wing) and turboshafts (helos).

    In engine driven systems, it has only rarely been thought to be worth the trouble and weight. In electrics it may be a little more broadly applicable, but the same issues of duplicated systems do come to the fore and eat into the benefits...

    The one real beauty in coaxial props with multiple motors for electrics is in redundancy. Carefully designed, we can prevent many single point failures from causing complete power loss at any one prop (or rotor), and that has considerable value in Failure Mode Management. Even then, you may have to build in quite a bit of excess power - the good engine is nominally making one-half the nominal power of the system, and it is trying to express that power while moving air through a prop and motor that are likely windmilling and can be sucking up significant power. In addition, the powered prop is likely being dragged down (max rpm-wise) some by the interactions with the unpowered prop, which can further reduce the expressed power. Say you are now down to 30% real power expressed as moving air when one is dead - are you able to fly level or are you just carrying the airplane to a different location for the forced landing? Adding in enough reserve power on one eats into your glide range and overall efficiency too.

    The problems of a gas engine running two props instead of one show up when you go with one electric motor or two to do the same thing. The magnitudes may be a little different, but the problems end up being very similar...

    Billski
     
    proppastie likes this.
  7. May 25, 2019 #67

    blane.c

    blane.c

    blane.c

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2015
    Messages:
    2,888
    Likes Received:
    492
    Location:
    capital district NY
    ENGINES FACING EACH OTHER.PNG Just find a convenient place to locate, no extra gearing needed.
     
  8. May 25, 2019 #68

    henryk

    henryk

    henryk

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2010
    Messages:
    4,547
    Likes Received:
    417
    Location:
    krakow,poland
    =one motor,NO gear, two propellers=reactionless drive,
    very energy efficiant ... "CR FLIGHT" !
     
  9. May 25, 2019 #69

    proppastie

    proppastie

    proppastie

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2012
    Messages:
    3,511
    Likes Received:
    1,006
    Location:
    NJ
    link?
     
  10. May 26, 2019 #70

    RonL

    RonL

    RonL

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2007
    Messages:
    430
    Likes Received:
    20
    Location:
    Texas
    Last edited: May 26, 2019
  11. May 26, 2019 #71

    BBerson

    BBerson

    BBerson

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    11,419
    Likes Received:
    2,095
    Location:
    Port Townsend WA
    Coaxial props are less efficient than a well designed single prop. The only reason to use a coaxial is limited ground clearance or something.
    Coaxials were used for some helicopters for torque cancelation, but the nagatives are more than the positives so they are rare.
    Briefly, a prop accelerates a tube of air. Trying to add more momentum with a second prop to that high speed air is less efficient. Better to put the second prop in unaccelerated air.
     
  12. May 26, 2019 #72

    RonL

    RonL

    RonL

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2007
    Messages:
    430
    Likes Received:
    20
    Location:
    Texas
    Let's look at that on the workbench:cool:

    upload_2019-5-25_18-42-38.png

    They don't show the readings on those meter boxes, but I think they might indicate some interesting results.
     
    Last edited: May 26, 2019
  13. May 26, 2019 #73

    pictsidhe

    pictsidhe

    pictsidhe

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2014
    Messages:
    5,890
    Likes Received:
    1,500
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Contra props can run efficiently at higher advance ratios than singles. Though it isn't a common need at our speeds...
     
  14. May 26, 2019 #74

    proppastie

    proppastie

    proppastie

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2012
    Messages:
    3,511
    Likes Received:
    1,006
    Location:
    NJ
  15. May 26, 2019 #75

    daveklingler

    daveklingler

    daveklingler

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    49
    Likes Received:
    11
    Location:
    Albuquerque
    Oh, heck, I meant to type "electric and counter rotation". Sigh.

    There. I fixed it.
     
  16. May 26, 2019 #76

    henryk

    henryk

    henryk

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2010
    Messages:
    4,547
    Likes Received:
    417
    Location:
    krakow,poland
    -are they say,whot distance is optimal ?

    (my english is not anoth to understand speech!)
     
  17. May 26, 2019 #77

    henryk

    henryk

    henryk

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2010
    Messages:
    4,547
    Likes Received:
    417
    Location:
    krakow,poland
    =auer model (1.3 m diametr) give us 14 kG thrust force from 1 kW
    battery power (24 V *40 A )...not bad ?

    K=14/1,36 *sqr(14/1.33)=33 (no motor & controller efficiancy !)
     
  18. May 26, 2019 #78

    RonL

    RonL

    RonL

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2007
    Messages:
    430
    Likes Received:
    20
    Location:
    Texas
    They did not say much, but I think they were talking about finding the most perfect spacing between the props. But what came to my mind is the possibility of having in-flight, computer sensed adjustments, that include spacing between the props and speed of each prop in relation to each other.
    A way to maintain the most ideal airflow through the props, even as weather conditions change, air density and wind gust, being two.
     
    henryk likes this.
  19. May 26, 2019 #79

    henryk

    henryk

    henryk

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2010
    Messages:
    4,547
    Likes Received:
    417
    Location:
    krakow,poland
    20190422_181841.jpg
    -CR system with differential gear is ADAPTIVE one=

    RPM of propellers is in invert proportion to the actual drag momentum ...

    (sorry for my primitive english=homemade!)

    BTW=most coaxial gears have constant (+1) / (- 1) proportion and neads second reductor... (n/1).

    ="auer" is differential inverter and integrally circa 3:1 reductor,summary 3kg mass!
     
    Last edited: May 27, 2019

Share This Page

arrow_white