Decalage angle

Discussion in 'Aircraft Design / Aerodynamics / New Technology' started by Eugene, May 29, 2017.

Help Support HomeBuiltAirplanes Forum by donating:

  1. Aug 15, 2019 #1301

    proppastie

    proppastie

    proppastie

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2012
    Messages:
    3,883
    Likes Received:
    1,132
    Location:
    NJ
    you have no way to measure or see the drag of the engine......so you do not know
     
  2. Aug 15, 2019 #1302

    Eugene

    Eugene

    Eugene

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    May 26, 2017
    Messages:
    744
    Likes Received:
    135
    Location:
    Merrill, Wisconsin, USA
    I agree and it will be done someday. Moving muffler down didn't make any difference at all. Make me think that I am against something bigger.
     
  3. Aug 15, 2019 #1303

    ragflyer

    ragflyer

    ragflyer

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2007
    Messages:
    233
    Likes Received:
    48
  4. Aug 15, 2019 #1304

    Eugene

    Eugene

    Eugene

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    May 26, 2017
    Messages:
    744
    Likes Received:
    135
    Location:
    Merrill, Wisconsin, USA
    Yes, I remember this one!

    This is what I am doing = cleaning back side of my fuselage first. After that I do positive wing swept 1°- 3°to move CG forward. Then engine cowling will wrap around the wings.
     
  5. Aug 15, 2019 #1305

    Tornado Flyer

    Tornado Flyer

    Tornado Flyer

    Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2015
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Beech Bluff, TN USA
    I'm with Peter on this. If you do not enjoy flying it move to a different plane. Pushers are less efficient than tractors anyway. If you do enjoy it leave it along and fly it. Kind of like a wife, except you are not married to a plane and made no oath to stick with it.
     
  6. Aug 16, 2019 #1306

    Eugene

    Eugene

    Eugene

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    May 26, 2017
    Messages:
    744
    Likes Received:
    135
    Location:
    Merrill, Wisconsin, USA
    Yes, unfortunately I hear this all the time!!!:(

    And not only from my mother-in-law, but from active EAA members!

    Someone at Oshkosh was telling me that I would fit right in to 1976 crowd back then. That was time when so many different people were trying different things and getting different results. They were experimenting, trying different things, not afraid taking the risks. They would kill for all modern tools we have today with computers, internet,softwere.

    Most of us assembling 51% kit together knowing that many thousands of them flying already. And this is our comfort zone today? How many new homebuilts we see every year at AirVenture? What ever happened to this country? Were did experimental aviation moved too? Is there different Oshkosh somewhere? Were should I go and who should I talk too? So I don't sound stupid or crazy!!!

    And for what? For trying to improve flying characteristics of my aircraft? Why do I get this all the time - "...just sell and get different one"???

    Lucky me there is crazy Russians that I still can talk too. They don't see me as crazy, ............I wonder why? They think that is very hard to improve already good design. But if your aircraft is so bad to begin with = there should be all kinds of room for improvement! And if you are willing to try? Why not?!

    Recommendation is to make my new rear afterbody longer to get it past propeller.

    69296530_2320965134691673_4685260289971585024_n.jpeg
     
  7. Aug 16, 2019 #1307

    akwrencher

    akwrencher

    akwrencher

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2012
    Messages:
    1,116
    Likes Received:
    401
    Location:
    Gustavus, AK
    Tornado Flyer is perfectly right, IF, your only goal is to have a nice flying airplane to fly. If your enjoyment of your hobby includes experimenting and trying new things, and seeking to improve, and learning, then you are on the right path already. Different strokes for different folks, as they say.
    I have a similar affliction. Constantly want to improve things so they work better and more efficiently, the way they should! :)

    It's your hobby, do it the way you want. I'm looking forward to learning what the solution ends up being.
     
    poormansairforce and Eugene like this.
  8. Aug 16, 2019 #1308

    plncraze

    plncraze

    plncraze

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    1,621
    Likes Received:
    345
    60 years ago Peter Garrison started like this. Ask a few questions and play around with problem. Keep going Eugene. This is cool and you accomplish alot.
     
    Eugene likes this.
  9. Aug 16, 2019 #1309

    Eugene

    Eugene

    Eugene

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    May 26, 2017
    Messages:
    744
    Likes Received:
    135
    Location:
    Merrill, Wisconsin, USA
    8127C9C1-5A80-4FB4-9BC7-E06A81B9B0E8.jpeg 32D194B8-9DF5-4114-AE81-F37BE5C09C07.jpeg

    I did get a chance to fly this airplane a few days ago. I believe this one was just purchased for only $35,000. Definitely 21st century with all carbon fiber construction. Hands-down much better and much more capable machine. You can get it , put in your hanger and don’t do anything at all for a very long time. It is SLSA.

    So, what is there for me to do? Absolutely nothing. Convert to ELSA? And then what? Sitting on the couch and wondering where was most drag coming from on my Skyboy? Was engine cowling really that important? Who is right? And who was wrong?
     
    akwrencher likes this.
  10. Aug 17, 2019 #1310

    Eugene

    Eugene

    Eugene

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    May 26, 2017
    Messages:
    744
    Likes Received:
    135
    Location:
    Merrill, Wisconsin, USA
    fullsizeoutput_17a4.jpeg fullsizeoutput_17a5.jpeg

    Ok, here is another question:

    Let's say that something sticking out sideways in to the air stream on your aircraft. And you want to build some kind of fearing over it to improve drag. Cross section of this new fearing should look like airfoil, preferably symmetrical. This airfoil does have chord line and you should install this fearing on airplane with chord line parallel to longitudinal axis of your airplane.

    So, my plan is to make some kind frame using steel tubing and fill empty space with foam. This structure will have trailing edge and some kind of chord line. You can see it in red on my top picture. It will be made from one tube bend in to U-shape with both ends attached to landing gear. I will suspend it from tail boom with green spacer to make this frame to be parallel to longitudinal axis.

    The question is were is longitudinal axis on this airplane??? For no money in the world I couldn't get this information out of my designer. For weight and balance calculation his answer was: - "on wheels, on level ground".That was giving me original angles in green. My angles are different today and you can see them in red.

    If I see it correctly, every time you reduce drag or increase engine power = wing AOA is changing, so is position for longitudinal axis. So, I need to know today at what AOA my future low drag Skyboy will be flying at, so I can install my new afterbody creation at correct angle!!! Measuring to to the bottom the wing at 5200 rpm = 75% power I have 4° AOA. Or about 6°AOA to the chord line on 4412 airfoil.

    Wow! Don't think I am that smart!
     
    Last edited: Aug 17, 2019
  11. Aug 17, 2019 #1311

    plncraze

    plncraze

    plncraze

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    1,621
    Likes Received:
    345
    Maybe you mean angle of incidence or angle of attack? And on a symmetrical airfoil it's zero lift line is at no angle of attack.
     
  12. Aug 17, 2019 #1312

    Eugene

    Eugene

    Eugene

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    May 26, 2017
    Messages:
    744
    Likes Received:
    135
    Location:
    Merrill, Wisconsin, USA
    Sorry for confusion . Lets try different approach.

    Russians call it horizontal building line or axis. This imaginary line will be level in cruise at 75% power level flight. For weight and balance you supposed to bring aircraft in to this position were horizontal building line is level.

    During level flight this line vill be level, but wing AOA to the chord line anywhere from 6° to 0°depending on your design. Horizontal tail will be 1-6°negative.

    Problem is, that I don't know were this line is, on my airplane
     
  13. Aug 17, 2019 #1313

    plncraze

    plncraze

    plncraze

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    1,621
    Likes Received:
    345
    This might not be helpful but can you use a laser level or a bubble level in flight and compare it to the c of g leveling points to get an idea of where your fuselage is now in flight?
     
  14. Aug 17, 2019 #1314

    Eugene

    Eugene

    Eugene

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    May 26, 2017
    Messages:
    744
    Likes Received:
    135
    Location:
    Merrill, Wisconsin, USA
    I know exactly were my fuselage at 75% power in cruise! I am flying with level taped to passenger window for some time now. And at this position my wing has 4° AOA if you hold digital level to the bottom of 4412 airfoil.

    Question is were will it all be after I clean up my airplane?

    All I really need to know is what is my target AOA should be?
     
  15. Aug 18, 2019 #1315

    Eugene

    Eugene

    Eugene

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    May 26, 2017
    Messages:
    744
    Likes Received:
    135
    Location:
    Merrill, Wisconsin, USA
    Screen Shot 2019-08-17 at 20.50.57.png Screen Shot 2019-08-17 at 21.23.45.png
     
  16. Aug 18, 2019 #1316

    Eugene

    Eugene

    Eugene

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    May 26, 2017
    Messages:
    744
    Likes Received:
    135
    Location:
    Merrill, Wisconsin, USA
    Picture from SEAMAX instruction manual

    Screen Shot 2019-08-17 at 21.13.48.png
     
  17. Aug 18, 2019 #1317

    ragflyer

    ragflyer

    ragflyer

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2007
    Messages:
    233
    Likes Received:
    48
    Eugene, It is the wing incidence to fuselage you change as your cruise speed changes not the angle of the streamlining you are building.

    AOA is proportional to cl and cl is proportional to square of speed. So if you double the speed you would need about 4 times less angle , i.e. 4 degrees wing AOA becomes 1 degree AOA. This is an extreme case- remember to improve speed by 10% you need to decrease drag by 33% due to cube relationship.

    Now for small changes in speed you can keep the math simple and approximate as follows: for every % change in speed you expect double the % in angle change. For example, if you expect to get 10% improvement in speed then your angle will change by 20%, i.e wing AOA change from 4 degrees to 3.2 degrees.Streamlined shapes will not change drag dramatically with these small changes in angles, particularly given the cow like drag currently.
     
    Eugene likes this.
  18. Aug 18, 2019 #1318

    poormansairforce

    poormansairforce

    poormansairforce

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2017
    Messages:
    670
    Likes Received:
    160
    Location:
    Just an Ohioan
    I know you want the best result but this is a classic case of over thinking a problem.
     
    Tornado Flyer likes this.
  19. Aug 18, 2019 #1319

    Eugene

    Eugene

    Eugene

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    May 26, 2017
    Messages:
    744
    Likes Received:
    135
    Location:
    Merrill, Wisconsin, USA


    Thank you! Thank you! Thank you!

    That was all I needed!

    My airplane at 75% power during level flight has same position in the air as on level ground with about 4°AOA. If sometime 10 years from now I will get 10% speed increase of 10 MPH position of my aircraft in cruise will change less than 1°.

    So if I want to install missiles under my wings today and build brackets to support them. I will just install them level. Same brackets will work for me in the future and will be no need to change angle of incidence.

    Screen Shot 2019-08-18 at 08.48.35.png
     
  20. Aug 18, 2019 #1320

    Eugene

    Eugene

    Eugene

    Well-Known Member HBA Supporter

    Joined:
    May 26, 2017
    Messages:
    744
    Likes Received:
    135
    Location:
    Merrill, Wisconsin, USA

    Yes, I hear this from my wife all the time. And I don't know any way to change that, so life can get quick and easy, relaxing and simple. So, I stop thinking about things like angle of incidence.

    My ex-wife was trying to change that for 20 years unsuccessfully. Then she gave up and found herself "easy going guy".
     
    poormansairforce likes this.

Share This Page



arrow_white