Crosby CR-4

Homebuilt Aircraft & Kit Plane Forum

Help Support Homebuilt Aircraft & Kit Plane Forum:

Magisterol

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2021
Messages
123
Hello. Anybody by any chance has a drawing of the CR-4 wing construction? I have seen some pics and looks like the wing is made out of 3 sections: one central and two outer panels. but the central panel skin should have a kink on the centre line as the whole wing is tapered. I am curious how the main spar is built with that kink in it and how are the skin panels attached on the median line.
 

Tiger Tim

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2013
Messages
4,034
Location
Thunder Bay
From photos it looks like the underside skins are joined with a strip a couple inches wide, I assume the same on top.

Are you building a CR-4? I have a big file going on Crosby’s racers on an old, dead laptop that I should resurrect. At one time I wanted to build one but changed my mind watching takeoff videos of other similarly loaded single seaters.

Also, is that Russ’ old Mustang II in your avatar pic?
 

Magisterol

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2021
Messages
123
From photos it looks like the underside skins are joined with a strip a couple inches wide, I assume the same on top.

Are you building a CR-4? I have a big file going on Crosby’s racers on an old, dead laptop that I should resurrect. At one time I wanted to build one but changed my mind watching takeoff videos of other similarly loaded single seaters.

Also, is that Russ’ old Mustang II in your avatar pic?
It is Russ’ airplane. I bought it last year, few month before he passed away. I like it, but he didn’t fly it much before I bought it, so a bit of expenses to bring it back “on line”.... I am not building a Cr-4. I am trying to build something else with a tapered wing and I don’t know how to make the past in the middle: put a kink in it or join it there. The simple solution would be like a Midget Mustang, but with a larger rectangular central panel and two tapered side panels....
 
Last edited:

Victor Bravo

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2014
Messages
9,839
Location
KWHP, Los Angeles CA, USA
There's many folks here who know a lot more than me about this kind of stuff... but the amount of taper and wingtip chord on that Crosby racer looks really unpleasant. I'd be sh****ng myself going around a low altitude pylon turn in that. I'll bet my a$$ that they didn't put any washout in that wing either.
 

Magisterol

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2021
Messages
123
There's many folks here who know a lot more than me about this kind of stuff... but the amount of taper and wingtip chord on that Crosby racer looks really unpleasant. I'd be sh****ng myself going around a low altitude pylon turn in that. I'll bet my a$$ that they didn't put any washout in that wing either.
From what I heard he was a very good pilot. I guess he build the airplane for his own skills. I don’t think it was intended for “safety” or to be easy to fly. Most likely it was intended to fly as fast as possible on a specific power. I guess those were the days of true race pilots. It would be nice to be able to talk to some of those pilots and asked them to fly the newer homebuilt airplanes and compare.
 

TFF

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2010
Messages
15,839
Location
Memphis, TN
From the pictures I think this plane has a mix. You can see some big fittings in front of the face of the spar, and the strip is structural. That joint looks like it was lifted off a military plane. I’m sure it was to truck it to races and put together.

If a wing panel has to come off, I would design it with normal fittings and have a similar filler strip but flush. If you are expecting it to fold, it’s probably best to leave the seam and make it as close as possible.

I’m not quite sure what you mean by kink. A joggle or are you calling the joining panel a kink?
 

Magisterol

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2021
Messages
123
From the pictures I think this plane has a mix. You can see some big fittings in front of the face of the spar, and the strip is structural. That joint looks like it was lifted off a military plane. I’m sure it was to truck it to races and put together.

If a wing panel has to come off, I would design it with normal fittings and have a similar filler strip but flush. If you are expecting it to fold, it’s probably best to leave the seam and make it as close as possible.

I’m not quite sure what you mean by kink. A joggle or are you calling the joining panel a kink?
For me a kink is a sharp bent. I was talking about the top and bottom of the wing where they meets in the centre of the airplane. If there is no joint in that spot, then it must be a sharp bent. That is why I was looking for plans. If there is a joint in the middle of the wing, inside the fuselage, it means that the wing is made from 4 parts: two panels that joint in the middle, forming the centre panel, and the two outside panels.
 

Tiger Tim

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2013
Messages
4,034
Location
Thunder Bay
The main spar is probably continuous through the centre section and I bet the top spar cap just runs straight across while the bottom is a very, very shallow V.
 

TFF

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2010
Messages
15,839
Location
Memphis, TN
It’s 4 pieces. The bottom of the wing you can see the filler strip down the center. and the book end spots that have to be brackets. All the pictures I see head on, the wing has dihedral to the middle.
 

Magisterol

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2021
Messages
123
It’s 4 pieces. The bottom of the wing you can see the filler strip down the center. and the book end spots that have to be brackets. All the pictures I see head on, the wing has dihedral to the middle.
That is whaa I thought too. It is made out of four panels. The middle two are ”more permanently “ attached togheter, while the outer two can be removed with 2 pins on each side (top and bottom)... Wasn’t sure, but I guess it makes sense now. Thanks.
 

jvliet

Active Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2019
Messages
32
The CR-4 was originally built with a one-piece wing and was trucked from California to Cleveland for the 1938 races fully assembled and canted up at an angle on a flatbed truck. After returning to CA and before its next trip to Cleveland for the 1939 races, the wing outer panels were cut off, then reattached at Cleveland using aluminum strips about 4 inches wide. In photos at Cleveland '39 these strips are seen unpainted.
 

Magisterol

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2021
Messages
123
The CR-4 was originally built with a one-piece wing and was trucked from California to Cleveland for the 1938 races fully assembled and canted up at an angle on a flatbed truck. After returning to CA and before its next trip to Cleveland for the 1939 races, the wing outer panels were cut off, then reattached at Cleveland using aluminum strips about 4 inches wide. In photos at Cleveland '39 these strips are seen unpainted.
Well, it could have been built as a one piece, but being made of metal, unless it was poured hot, it had to be assembled at the middle. That is why I was looking for plans. See how the two parts were joint together.
 

plncraze

Well-Known Member
HBA Supporter
Joined
May 11, 2006
Messages
2,128
Do a search for books on the older racers. Sometimes they will have good pictures.
 

jvliet

Active Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2019
Messages
32
Well, it could have been built as a one piece, but being made of metal, unless it was poured hot, it had to be assembled at the middle. That is why I was looking for plans. See how the two parts were joint together.
I have some construction photos and will take a look to see if any of them clearly show the spar center section joint. I expect it will be riveted doubler plates on top and bottom spar caps
 

CRG

Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2019
Messages
14
Is the wing not flat across the upper surface? With dihedral given by the tapering thickness.

The stated 600lb higher weight of the CR-4 over the SK-4 seems high, I wouldn't have thought the aircraft large enough to have an extra 600 pounds in it.
 

Magisterol

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2021
Messages
123
I have some construction photos and will take a look to see if any of them clearly show the spar center section joint. I expect it will be riveted doubler plates on top and bottom spar caps
That is what I was looking in the photos, magnifying them as much as possible, but the become very pixelated.
 

Magisterol

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2021
Messages
123
Is the wing not flat across the upper surface? With dihedral given by the tapering thickness.

The stated 600lb higher weight of the CR-4 over the SK-4 seems high, I wouldn't have thought the aircraft large enough to have an extra 600 pounds in it.
i think you might be right. Looks flat at the top inside the fuselage. Maybe it is only the bottom spar cap that is made of 2 parts. That might be a solution.
 
Top