Can someone confirm the Viking 130 has electronic ignition subject to "electrons stop, the engine stops" syndrome of recent T-51 fame.
Don't be too quick to blame the engine.
My dear sir...it's a *package*. If it requires electronic ignition, and the electronic ignition is not reliable, then the builder would have been better off to install a traditional certified engine with a traditional pair of magnetos. You can't blame the engineers at Ford, Subaru, or Volkswagen for the loss of power of an auto-engine conversion, but the accessories are all part and parcel of an engine installation.
Whether an accident reflects *specifically* on an auto-engine conversion company does depend on the builder's decisions. But that rides on whether the conversion accessories (ignition system, PSRU, radiators, etc.) are provided in the kit, as well as detailed installation instructions. If the assembly instructions provides these accessories as well as specific detail on wiring, protection, etc. and the builder didn't follow those instructions, that's less finger-pointing at the conversion company. An old saying goes, "It's impossible to make anything fool-proof, because fools are so ingenious."
In my 1998-2020 homebuilt accident database, there 4133 fixed-wing aircraft that had traditional aircraft engines, and 484 accidents with auto-engine conversions. The traditional engines had 25 cases out of the 4133 (0.6%) where magneto or engine controller failure caused the accident. The auto engines had 33 out of the 484... 6.8%, over ten times the rate.
The fact is, the average homebuilder can't implement auto-engine conversion powerplants with the same reliability of traditional engines. And half of homebuilders are below average.
Mind you, engine failures aren't the ONLY cause of homebuilt accidents, even those of auto-engine homebuilts. I estimate that auto-engined homebuilts have an 18% higher accident rate than traditional-engined homebuilts.
Ron Wanttaja